The four state referendum, I believe the result is certain, otherwise it would be unnecessary. The inducement of each war is multifaceted, NATO's eastward expansion , tension in relations, strategic needs, Western incitement...... Various reasons led to the Russian-Ukrainian war. When the smoke of the war has not yet dissipated, the four states have voted for the referendum. Is this the primary goal of Russia in this battle? Stop NATO's eastward expansion is just a pretext?
protests against
motivation and achieve the primary goal.
When the world is still paying attention to Russia's next strategic trends, Russian local attacks, etc., the four states began referendums, and the world seemed to have come back to its senses. Oh, it turns out that this is Russia's ultimate goal. If this is the case, the Russian battle was dragged on, the structure was chaotic, and the attack and defense were over, because these were all fake shots, and others did not want to defeat them at all, let alone swallow them all, but just wanted to bite off a piece of meat. The previous attacks are just to lay the groundwork for this purpose. After the referendum of the four states, the negotiation conditions proposed at the time are no longer important, and even the war can be ended at any time because the primary goal has been achieved.
strategic channel
strategy, open the Black Sea channel.
It is not difficult to find from the map that these four states are connected together and lead directly to the Black Sea. If it returns to Russia, Russia will have a "highway" directly to the Black Sea, allowing the Russian Black Sea fleet, which was originally restrained, to completely get rid of the constraints and then have control over the entire Black Sea region. In this way, NATO's eastward expansion will not be enough to pose too much threat to Russia. Instead, it will strengthen Russia's voice in the Black Sea region, and can also suppress NATO countries from the Black Sea direction and build a new strategic buffer zone.
Direct to Black Sea
