, India had 6 applications for permanent membership. Coincidentally, a major country rejected it every time.
And every time he rejected his application, the country was different. Wuchang rejected it, which seemed to have become a tacit understanding.
When the application was submitted for the first time, Russia opposed; the second application was opposed by France; the third time, the United Kingdom opposed; the fourth time, the United States opposed; the fifth time, China opposed; the sixth time, the United States opposed again.
But even so, India is still happy to apply for the five permanent members.
Recently, India’s First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Shringela stated at a press conference that US President Biden believes that India should become a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
news comes out. There is joy in India again, shouting that India has won and is about to join the permanent membership, and the president of the United States has supported India.
Can hold back and don't laugh, this time we will come to understand in depth, this India, which is often open and messed up in national governance, do you know how hard it has worked in order to become permanent?
Even though Americans always encourage India to join the permanent permanent residence, the biggest obstacle to India's permanent permanent membership is the US. What is the US afraid of?
And every time an application is rejected, the whole world is watching Indian jokes. Does the Prime Minister of India really understand? Or is it intentional?
Finally, let’s talk about India, if India really wants to become permanent, what should he do?
Legally speaking, why does India still have a chance to join the permanent residence? And the opportunity is quite big, and even Wuchang has reached a consensus as early as 2010.
In 1945, at the end of World War II, several major powers in the anti-fascist allies re-established the world order in San Francisco. The " UN Charter " was passed and the United Nations was established.
The Charter stipulates the principle of "great powers unanimous": that is, when the UN Security Council votes on non-procedural issues, as long as a major power disagrees, the resolution cannot be passed.
And the five decisive countries are China,Britain, the United States, France, and the Soviet Union.
And where is India at this time? Why did you fight for it?
In fact, India at this time was still a British colony, and it became independent only two years later (1947). Therefore, every time I think about this, India is still a little bit "sorrowful".
However, it is more Indians who think too much. A nation that can't even drive away the colonists and complains about their untimely birth and wants to participate in the formulation of the international order. That is really a delusion!
So, India lost the seat of permanent member of the Security Council at the starting line from the very beginning.
So, what is this council? What are permanent members? Why make India think about it?
In this way, there are more than one hundred and ninety sovereign countries in the world, and they all have the right to vote in the United Nations.
However, this voting right refers to the voting right for general affairs, such as environmental protection, poverty alleviation and other general matters. All countries can vote for one vote.
And if it involves the discussion of war and major security or economic sanctions, then the United Nations will have to organize a small group and hold a small meeting, but it cannot allow all countries to vote.
This will be one of the six main organs of the United Nations and the only United Nations agency authorized to take military actions.
As long as the resolution passed at this meeting is decided, more than one hundred other countries in the world, even if they are not present at the meeting, will have to abide by it.
This conference body is the Security Council, the full name of the United Nations Security Council.
And who will open this council? This is what the United Nations stipulates.
First of all, the five major nations of the United Nations can participate in every meeting because they have paid a considerable price and made important contributions in the anti-fascist war.
China needless to say, China has paid huge casualties, 35 million military and civilian casualties, and contained millions of Japanese fascist troops on the road.
Then the three countries, the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union, fought against Nazi Germany.
France is finally here,France is special. At the beginning of World War II, he was surrendered by Nazi Germany. In the end, he was able to become a permanent member, mainly because it was pulled by the British as a balance of power, allowing the French to pick up a bargain.
These are the five permanent members who have the most important veto power over the Security Council.
The Security Council has permanent members, and naturally there are non-permanent members.
In order to prevent the five major powers from colluding to manipulate the UN, the United Nations also introduced non-permanent members to allow them to participate in the war economic sanctions meeting.
However, non-permanent members only have a two-year term of office. More importantly, non-permanent members do not have a veto power.
There were 6 non-permanent members at the beginning, and later, as the number of independent sovereign countries in the world increased, it only expanded to 10.
A major resolution of the Security Council needs to be approved by 15 members and 9 or more members, and no one in the five permanent members voted against it.
This can reflect the extraordinary status of permanent members. Because of this, India is willing to apply for permanent membership.
The first time India launched an impact on the position of Wuchang was in 1994, when it first aimed its muzzle at Russia, which had just experienced and the disintegration of the Soviet Union .
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia did not immediately inherit all the power of the Soviet Union. Therefore, from 1991 to 1993, there was a vacancy in the position of the Wuchang.
In 1994, after passing the "Zero Point Agreement", Russia must inherit all the debts of the Soviet Union, but in exchange, Russia can also have all the rights of the Soviet Union overseas, including the permanent seat of the United Nations.
In 1994, ethnic conflicts in various parts of Russia continued to riot, and the Chechen War of Independence was also detonated.
At this time, Russia has foreign troubles inside, there are wars to fight inside, and there are a lot of debts to be settled outside.
But even so, Russia has finally overcome all kinds of difficulties and restored its five permanent seats.
So, India is also fascinated and confident that Russia can do it, and so can I.
Therefore, India applied to the UN for permanent membership in 1994.
It has three reasons for applying, basically the slot is full.
First, India is the world’s largest democracy, with a long civilization and a worldview with a global perspective;
Second, India is one of the world’s major economies and will play a role in the development of the international economic and financial order An increasingly important role;
Third, India’s long-term participation in UN peacekeeping operations reflects the political will of the Indian government to actively contribute to peacekeeping operations.
However, India’s first application was rejected by Russia, which had just returned to the United Nations.
It is normal to say that India was vetoed. It is only natural that Russia can regain its position as a permanent member of the Council. How old is India?
The permanent members of the council are all countries that have been carrying guns, desperately, paying a huge price, and have been in the fire for several times.
A country unified by British colonists, a slave who dreams of non-violence and does not cooperate, and wants to be a regular master is simply wishful thinking.
was rejected by Russia, and India's hatred was written down.
So 3 years later (1997), India smashed Russia.
This is how it happened. During the Cold War, in order to win over India, the Soviet Union lent India about 14 billion rubles for decades, and there was also a lot of material assistance.
At that time, 1 US dollar was about 1 ruble. However, in 1997, Russia's shock therapy caused a severe economic crisis. The ruble exchange rate plummeted and dropped directly to 3000 rubles per dollar.
The ruble became a piece of waste paper, and Russia almost collapsed again.
Taking this opportunity, India wants to repay Russia’s loans from the former Soviet Union, and insists on repaying them in rubles. Subsequently, the 14 billion rubles after the depreciation were collected, and about 3 million US dollars were returned to Russia, which is simply taking advantage of the fire.
, of course, directly planted it, and Russia smashed the seeds of India in various subsequent transactions.
After repaying the foreign debt in 1997,The following year (98), India produced an atomic bomb again. Originally, I wanted to use the atomic bomb to hit the five permanent positions again. As a result, Pakistan also produced an atomic bomb. India had no choice but to give up, and the Wuchang dream was broken.
In 2000, Japan, Germany, India, and Brazil formed the four-nation alliance and applied for the five permanent positions together.
India and Brazil are still reluctant to apply, what is going on in Japan and Germany? We must know that the establishment of the United Nations is based on the elimination of Japanese and German fascism.
Today, India has applied 6 times in total, and every time it applies, there are big countries supporting him.
In 2003, Putin expressed support for India's entry into the permanent office because of the purchase of a lot of arms from Russia.
In 2004, because of the purchase of arms from the United States, Bush Jr. publicly supported it, but later expressed opposition.
In 2008, Britain and France came to New Delhi, India together, and also said that India should become a permanent member.
2008 is a special year, because in this year, India also successfully joined the G20, the G20 summit, so they took advantage of the hot iron, once again applied for permanent membership, and subsequently rejected by France.
In 2010, Obama also said during his visit to India that he supported India as a permanent member of the Security Council.
But soon the US Secretary of State Hillary 's statement was revealed by WikiLeaks. They mocked India as the "self-appointed first candidate for a permanent member of the Security Council."
However, India is still full of confidence and believes that it has received the support of the four regulars, which is one place short of it.
So the "India Today" magazine came to visit our prime minister and asked whether they would support them to become a permanent member of the council.
What they asked, regarding the reform of international institutions such as the United Nations,Will China support India in playing a more important role, including becoming a permanent member of the UN Security Council?
Our prime minister's answer is also very high level, so he said:
"China attaches great importance to India's status as a major developing country in international affairs, and supports India's desire to play a greater role in the United Nations, including the Security Council." Simply put You have my moral support.
Although India often does things at the border, we do not veto the country where India has the most frequent entrants. The United States has the most vetoes. How is this going?
Let’s talk about how American scholars define India as a country. It is said that India is an ambitious but influential teenager.
"Although India has shown excellent business acumen and extraordinary creativity in the process of economic development, India today is just an international teenager, a country with great ambitions but lack of influence."
India also knows that it lacks Influence, so you have to spend a lot of money to engage in relations with the outside world. Do you know how hard India is?
As early as 2003, India established the India, Brazil, and South Africa Trilateral Dialogue Forum (IBSA). One of the important topics in it was to win permanent seats.
In addition, since its independence, India has been one of the countries with the largest number of UN peacekeepers.
India does not deny that one of the purposes of active participation is to become permanent members.
As of 2013, there are 7,840 Indian soldiers and police deployed in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Côte d’Ivoire , Liberia, Africa and other countries such as Sudan and South Sudan.
In the joint statement of the Indo-African Forum Summit held in 2011, India and the African Union both expressed their respective demands for “entry into the permanent membership” and announced that they would work together to do their utmost to promote the reform of the Security Council at the UN General Assembly.
In 2010, India was elected as a non-permanent member of the Security Council with high votes.
years of hard work,India has finally become a member, but it is only a short seat without veto power.
In response, India’s ambassador to the United Nations Puri expressed the hope that India will have a “permanent” seat on the Security Council in two years' time.
During the 2012 UN General Assembly, his foreign minister issued a statement, determined to inject greater political impetus into the reform of the UN Security Council.
advocates that the UN General Assembly should vote on the expansion of the Security Council, not just relying on internal resolutions of the Security Council, and not just relying on the five permanent members to decide.
So, at this time, India has already dared to openly challenge the Five Commons.
In the report on global governance 2025, India said so. Indians believe that existing international organizations are very unsound in responding to challenges and complain that global governance is facing a "leadership crisis."
India recognizes that in order to better protect its national interests, it must first change from a rule accepter to a rule maker;
India believes that the existing framework of the United Nations has greatly restricted him, especially the existence of the five permanent members. Especially the presence of the United States.
This can be seen from India’s voting records in the UN General Assembly and the Security Council. India has actually kept a distance from the United States, and even confronted the United States tit-for-tat on many issues.
In the eyes of the United States, India, which has an independent diplomatic tradition, has a distrustful attitude towards American policies. Moreover, India is "swaying" and sometimes extremely destructive—not enough success, more than failure.
Under these circumstances, the United States believes that India’s diligence for a seat on the Security Council is very questionable.
It is still difficult to determine whether an India with veto power will pose a threat to US interests.
So, out of India's 6 applications for permanent membership, the United States rejected it twice, the largest number.
Although the major countries are rejecting India's permanent membership, the hardness is not completely hopeless.
Because the five permanent members are really considering whether they can expand the number of permanent members.
only, after the expansion, the number of veto powers,There are still only 5, this is the bottom line, and it has become a consensus.
On June 22, 2010, the UN Security Council held an intergovernmental consultation meeting on reform, during which the "five permanent members" unanimously stated that "changes to the status quo are not allowed." This is very clear in the official statement of the US government.
The translation is that the permanent seats can be expanded, but there are only 5 veto powers. Even if India gets the seats, it still does not have the veto power. The principle of
is also very simple. If the veto power is flooded, its influence will be "diluted" and the United Nations will not be able to play its due role. And no one in the "Five Constants" wants their own interests to suffer.
And if India is still unwilling to be a permanent member of this castrated version, it can only wait for the next global reshuffle.
The last time the global pattern was adjusted was due to World War II. Then, the probability of the global pattern adjustment caused by the war is very low.
In the future adjustment of the global pattern, the greater probability will be the adjustment of the economic pattern, which is a kind of economic war that is taking place.
As the economy becomes larger and more influential, you can control the world's right to speak wherever you are.
From this perspective, India is still doing a good job in the economy. First, it solves the food and clothing of ordinary people. Otherwise, the hungry belly leaves every day clamoring for the status of a big country, not too much. Face.
Do you think India still has a chance to obtain a permanent seat with a veto power? Please leave a message in the comment area below. (End)
.
