The special envoy of the US President visits China, meet with Wang Yi on video! To the United States to show China's "red line"!
U.S. President’s special envoy for climate change Kerry arrived in Tianjin smoothly on September 1. However, he has just concluded his visit to Japan before. Due to various considerations such as epidemic prevention and control, my country’s State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi met him by video. This time, China and the United States will discuss and exchange views on issues such as the climate crisis. In addition, Wang Yi pointed out during the meeting that for safety reasons, all personnel who had actual contact with the US this time will be placed under quarantine and observation for another two weeks. I have to say that my country is really cautious and careful in terms of epidemic control.
However, the purpose of Kerry’s visit to China should be far more than that simple, otherwise the United States can propose to communicate in the form of a video interview, so why bother to go to China specially. Therefore, China also sent a clear signal to the United States this time, that is, China is willing and welcomes the United States to discuss matters with it. This is also the hope that the United States can understand and achieve true "mutual respect" instead of being a "double-faced person" every time it wants to get benefits.
Judging from the current situation, China and the United States do have differences on certain issues, but it does not mean that mutually beneficial cooperation cannot continue. Rather, they should promote further dialogue and work hard to get Sino-US relations back on track. Kerry's real intention in this visit to China is to obtain concessions from China in the economic field, so as to benefit the United States. Because of the "carbon emission targets" set by the US, it actually hopes that China will use this as a standard to adjust its industry. But in fact, the per capita carbon emissions of the United States are not low, and it should make corresponding adjustments. However, this may serve as a breakthrough for Sino-US cooperation, and perhaps China and the United States can expand cooperation on a larger scale.
For the requirements of the United States,Wang Yi clearly stated China's attitude and position, especially reiterating China's "red line." That is, the "two bottom lines" and "three lists" proposed by Sherman during her visit to China on July 26. We hope that the United States will take it seriously and seriously. If Sino-US relations are to be truly eased and improved, the United States must make changes. In particular, the U.S. can no longer continue to commit atrocious acts that harm China’s interests and infringe upon China’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the U.S. can’t intensify its efforts to obstruct China’s development, otherwise it will add more new debts. Development is also extremely unfavorable.
In fact, the current change in the US attitude and policy is very important. Since we want to talk to China, we must show due sincerity. Otherwise, why should China talk to the United States? The United States also wanted to start a dialogue with China based on its strength and status, but it is a pity that the Chinese simply do not eat this set! Coupled with the repeated violations of China's core interests by the Biden administration, it is absolutely impossible for China to let it go easily. Otherwise, wouldn't everyone dare to jump on China's bottom line? Don't use China's restraint and etiquette as excuses for constant provocation. China will not tolerate these presumptuous behaviors!
And on September 1, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Wang Wenbin also responded to the China-US talks at a regular press conference. Wang Wenbin said that China and the United States should maintain communication in areas of mutual respect in technology and in areas of common interest, and also adopt effective measures to manage and control differences between China and the United States, and push Sino-US relations back to the track of stable development.
.
