On December 4, Beijing time, Argentina eliminated Australia 2:1. Although Messi and his team won the game, the king of football Messi was also a god who came down to earth and scored the first goal of the game, making great contributions to the team breaking the deadlock.
But in this context, we still need to review another major scandal and controversy in the World Cup. This controversy still comes from Messi's opponent, Australia. Argentina won, but even if it won, it does not mean they should be bullied, and it does not mean they should be targeted by the referee, but this is the case in this game. In fact, the real score is not 2-1, which should be 3-1, because Argentina should have received a penalty kick, but the referee did not make a judgment.
If the referee and VAR do not have double-standard penalty, Messi may have scored a goal by relying on penalty kicks, so he may have scored twice in this game. If this is true, Messi will take off completely. When did this round happen? He played for 5 minutes at the beginning of the game. At 5 minutes, Gomez, who was in Argentina, wanted to complete an cross to . Australian players came to defend, but when defending, his hand was misplaced.
At that time, Gomez's cross was blocked directly by an Australian player with his hands. This was an obvious handball action, and since this person reached out to block it in the penalty area, a penalty should be awarded. Gomez made a cross, and he directly reached out to the racket and destroyed the ball. If this is not a handball, what is a handball? This is an obvious handball action, and the greater controversy at this time is that VAR did not even perform even a look back, which is too unreasonable.
This World Cup is called the highest technological content, spending 230 billion yuan. In this case, VAR has gradually become the mainstream theme of the game. Sometimes the referees are their puppets, and VAR can overturn the referee's judgment. In the game of Croatia , referee Anthony Taylor first blew a penalty kick. VAR said that this was not an offside penalty kick, and after he came back, the penalty kick was cancelled. This situation could be done, which means that VAR has actually replaced the referee, and the dignity of the referee has also been challenged and questioned.
So the question is, at the beginning of the game, why didn’t Australian handball not award a penalty for that ball? Why don't you watch it? This is what makes people completely incomprehensible. This is a very obvious handball action. So what is the function of VAR? Should you watch selectively or help you manipulate the game? Why do some action referees not say that they want to watch replay? VAR must watch and prompt the referee how to judge. Why do you not watch replay? Just talking about this action, isn’t it worth a replay?
After replaying, it is likely to be a penalty kick. If you don’t give the penalty kick you should give, you shouldn’t give it blindly. This is the real situation now. And why VAR doesn’t play back? The referee on the spot also needs to give a response to this controversial ball. If there is one or two replays, you can see what the problem is. This is an obvious handball action. Argentina cannot take this unjust loss and cannot be targeted. After all, if you play Australia in the knockout stage, you can still win, but if you encounter an opponent with similar strength and are targeted like this, you may lose.
