According to Taiwanese media reports, Taoyuan Mayor Zheng Wencan said on a political commentary program last night that the DPP Taoyuan Mayor candidate Zheng Yunpeng and former "legislator" Zheng Baoqing polls were more than 10%, emphasizing that the recruitment must have undergone rigorous and objective polls. Zheng Baoqing refuted this and said that Zheng Wencan was lying.

Zheng Baoqing Photo source Taiwan media
The Democratic Progressive Party announced on the 12th that Taoyuan mayor candidate replaced former Hsinchu Mayor Lin Zhijian, and "Legislator" Zheng Yunpeng ran for the election. Zheng Wencan said on a political commentary program yesterday that Zheng Yunpeng's polls were ahead and the recruitment was rigorous and objective, and 8 people passed the "Selecting and Comparison Meeting".
Zheng Baoqing said that the polls for the DPP Taoyuan mayor nomination are completely untrue, and Zheng Wencan lied! He said that he met Zheng Wencan on the 21st. Zheng Wencan said that he would respond to Taiwan's leader Tsai Ing-wen and Democratic Progressive Party Secretary-General Lin Xiyao and then use polls to decide the candidates, but the method was not open, fair and fair as Zheng Baoqing advocated at all. So Zheng Wencan said on the 23rd that he wanted to meet with former chairman Xu Xinliang and Zheng Baoqing and the other three, but he did not agree.
Zheng Baoqing also said that former Secretary-General Su Jiaquan conveyed Tsai Ing-wen's agreement on the 22nd that he was willing to conduct special polls between Zheng Baoqing and Zheng Yunpeng. The winners qualify and can replace Zheng Yunpeng. However, there was no open, fair and fair poll basis, so he politely declined to meet.
Su Jiaquan once again conveyed on the 23rd that Tsai Ing-wen hopes to meet on the 24th. But Zheng Baoqing felt that it was not open or fair, but that he just continued to use confiscation of democracy and negotiations in secret rooms to decide candidates, which violated Zheng Baoqing's beliefs and persistence along the way, so he had to refuse.
Zheng Baoqing said that if the original nomination process was open and fair, why did Tsai Ing-wen and Zheng Wencan still conduct polls? If polls cannot be open, fair and just, then who can believe it? What credibility is there? He also said that if the polls are made up, the winner can qualify and replace Zheng Yunpeng. Isn’t that clearly lie again? (Editor: Fang Yanyan)