Source: Strait Shinkansen
Kaohsiung The dangerous building fire in the "city in the city" caused 46 deaths and 41 injuries. Such a major casualties caused donations from all walks of life on the island to pour into Kaohsiung. Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chimai publicly thanked the blue and green political "big names" for their personal visits and donations at a press conference on the 18th, and pointed out that "the same island and the same life and the same woe are shared."
Those who say that the Blue Camp "has been happy" are "happy"
slap in the face or not? !
If Han Kuo-yu is still the mayor of Kaohsiung, I guess after the dangerous building fire that killed 46 people, the "angry" artillery fire of the green camp will first blow Han Kuo-yu into ruins, and together they are nailed to the shame rack forever, the political party to which he belongs, the Kuomintang. In the future, the green camp people will talk about this disaster from time to time, which will make the blue camp ashamed, just like 2.28.
But this time, the Kaohsiung Fire was in full swing, as the Kuomintang Chairman Zhu Lilun said, it happened a year and a half after Chen Chimai took charge of Kaohsiung. Looking back to the past 20 years, what has the DPP and the Kaohsiung Municipal Government done? The public safety issues of dangerous buildings in the "city in the city" did not appear today, fire protection facilities were not lacking today, and "all more" problems did not happen today... Isn't the laissez-faire and long-term inaction of the green camp officials not accomplice or helper of this disaster?
Chen Qimai was asked by the media on the morning of the 17th, "whether 46 lives have to step down", and said that he "had a heartache like a knife cutting it and did not avoid responsibility" and did not say whether he should take responsibility. Although Chen Chimai has to assume corresponding political responsibilities, he should give priority to the view of the dangerous buildings in Kaohsiung City from the perspective of public safety.
After the Kaohsiung fire, Tsai Ing-wen asked for a comprehensive review of the system issues such as building management, fire inspection, and "all more" dangerous old buildings on the island, and establish a necessary community management system; Su Zhenchang, the head of the Taiwan administrative agency, also said that the Taiwan internal affairs department should work with county and municipal governments to accelerate the inventory of old buildings on the island. If there are any public security risks and concerns, relevant protection actions should be activated. After
, the outside world questioned that the establishment of a management committee for the dangerous building that caused the fire was one of the causes of the disaster. The internal affairs department of Taiwan also said that it would "improve the law and establish it forcibly", as if it was confirmed that the fire was caused because of the lack of the management committee. However, a resident of the building said that he would pay NT$500 per month for NT$4 management fee. The resident said angrily, "So many people have died, and they still have to lie until now." He suspected that there was a conspiracy behind lying.
Regarding the dispute over whether there is a management committee, the Kuomintang’s national representative Li Guimin angrily bombarded the DPP, "Don’t think about bringing the wind or turning the blame", and putting the blame on the details of "whether there is a management committee or promoting the forced establishment of legislation", she said -
Everyone knows that the problem is not whether there is a management committee, but whether the county and city authorities have to test the public safety of old buildings in accordance with regulations. The incompetent DPP authorities only know how to use regulations as an excuse for administrative inaction, allowing all kinds of violations of public safety to occur continuously, and even turn a blind eye to the dangerous situation of residents.
The result of inaction has resulted in more than 40 lives being killed in the fire. Don’t try to put the blame on the residents of the building!
Tai Biru, a member of the Taiwan People's Party, also posted on Facebook today that she talked to her fellow villagers in Kaohsiung on weekends, and the most common topic was the various phenomena that were burned by the evil fire in Kaohsiung's "city in the city". An older fellow told her that the building where the accident had been prosperous, but somehow it began to gradually become a "ghost building" in people's mouth. Cai Biru questioned -
Over the past few years, have the county and municipal governments faced the dangerous old building "city in the city"? What is really sad is that our ignorance of weakness has become a habit.
Green Camp Private Agent Luo Meiling When questioning Taiwan’s legislative body today, it pointed out that the oldest average house age among the “6 capitals” is Taipei City, with more than 70% of the buildings having more than 30 years of house age.
Can these "old houses" problems in the future, can these real problems of "old houses" be solved by simply revising the regulations and forcibly establishing the management committee? Unfortunately, problems happened. All civil servants came out and said, "I have no responsibility" to pass the test? The DPP authorities should face a series of public security loopholes burned out by the Kaohsiung "City in the City" incident!
