"The Legend of Condor Heroes" There is a wonderful description of Xiaolongnu fighting against Hao Datong in Quanzhen School:
" (Little Dragonnu) raised his left hand lightly, and a white ribbon suddenly threw out and rushed straight to Hao Datong's face. This time it was silent, without any signs in advance. Under the candlelight, a golden ball was tied to the end of the ribbon. Hao Datong saw that she made a quick move and his weapons were extremely strange. He didn't know how to resist it for a while. He was old and steadily. Although he believed that his martial arts skills were much better than the other party, he refused to take the move rashly. He immediately went to the left to avoid it.
"...
" Hao Datong straightened his body, his face had already However, the color changed. The Qundao was either his disciple or his nephew. He had always been extremely impressed by his martial arts. Although he had not been injured, he was extremely embarrassed. All of them were shocked. The four Taoists each held long swords and stabbed Xiaolongnu. Xiaolongnu said, 'Yes, it should have been used long ago!' Waving his hands together, two white silk belts meandered out like water snakes, two sounds of ginger, and then two sounds of ginger. The 'spirit' holes on the wrists of the four Taoists were hit by the golden ball, and the four long swords were thrown underground. This time, the first sound was to win people, and all the linger changed color, and no one dared to attack again. "
From the description, Xiaolongnu should be a trick of using the meteor hammer.
Dear viewers may be whispering: What are you doing? Writing Newton, , Hawking , what are you talking about? Are there no connection between the wind and horses?
In fact, I just want to draw out gravity by writing a meteor hammer! The meteor hammer best interprets the principle of the solar system's operation.
Let’s take Xiaolongnu as an explanation: Xiaolongnu’s silk ribbon is tied to the front of Xiaolongnu’s silk ribbon. When she swings the silk ribbon, the small golden ball will move around her. At this time, the gravity of her hand and the centrifugal force of the small golden ball are balanced, so the small golden ball will neither fall nor fly out; if she wants the small golden ball to fly out, she must reduce her control over the silk ribbon. The less control she has on the silk ribbon, the farther the small golden ball will fly out.
The most brilliant martial artists or acrobats probably cannot move multiple meteor hammers or water meteors at the same time, right? Not to mention using thousands of meteor hammers or water meteors at the same time. Are there such a clever person in nature? Of course, he is the Sun.
Thousand-handed Tathagata Zhao Banshan , a famous Tai Chi master and a hidden weapon expert, just to describe him as quick-handed.
The sun is like a giant in a giant country. He tied eight children with invisible ropes (Pluto was expelled from the nine planets, so call him a chimpanzee), and countless kittens, puppies, fleas... etc., playing the tricks of meteor hammers and water meteors, and being able to retract and release them freely (pull them to the perihelion point when collecting; put them to the arihelion point when collecting).
Julyn is the largest among the eight children; Uranus is the worst. He refuses to walk properly and wants to lie on orbit and roll around. The most well-behaved should be the earth. He knows that his body should lean inward when doing circular movements. Therefore, his earth axis has an angle with the orbit (ecliptic) - he did not expect that when he tilts like this, the earth will have all year round and the year, and it has nurtured life, which also provides these lives (animals and plants) with endless residence, and makes himself the most beautiful planet in the universe.
Originally, because the sun is round, the gravitational field should also be spherical, right? Take the earth as an example. No matter whether it is the Antarctic or the Arctic or any point in the Eastern and Western Hemispheres, people or objects will not fall out, indicating that this place is affected by the gravity of the earth. As the sun, the same should be true. But why are the eight planets and other asteroids only in the lateral direction of the sun's rotation? Are there no planets moving up and down? According to my guess, in the early stages of the formation of the solar system, there might be other celestial bodies above and below it, but because there is no centrifugal force and only gravity, they are all sucked in by the sun, and they are integrated with the sun due to the high temperature of nuclear fusion.
, and the eight major planets and other asteroids have reached a balance between the centrifugal force brought by the high-speed rotation of the sun and the gravity of the sun, thus maintaining the current operating rules of the solar system.
So, in the macro world, gravity can still stand the test. We can think of the solar system as a circular "cake" with the sun as the center and the outermost gravitational circle as the boundary, which should basically be flat and round. This "cake" wanders in the vast universe under the guidance of the parents' sun - along the established route, orbiting the core of the Milky Way galaxy, the Sun led such a family to move forward at a speed of 250 kilometers per second (that is, 900,000 kilometers per hour). It took them 2.500 million years to complete a circle along this long journey (it can be considered to be back to their hometown).
remembered the poem by Petofi : "I wander in the vast world, I run on the thorny road..." "Song of Nanjing": "How long and desolate the road of life is, the steps of life are drifting in a secluded foreign land..." Is it insignificant that we humans are wandering and wandering with the melancholy and lament of wandering and wandering, and the sighs of the whole family's day and night, and courageous move forward without hesitation?
Similarly, the Galaxy system forms a larger "cake" and revolves around the larger extragalactic galaxy .
This forms a paradox - since the universe is boundless, then the universe should have no center; however, according to the gravity and the planets in front revolve around the sun - the sun revolves around the silver core - the Milky Way revolves around the extra-river galaxy... Finally, will all galaxies revolve around the center of the universe?
Even so, these movements are still in the horizontal direction. We can regard it as an extremely high floor, but it is just one floor after all. Will there be countless floors up and down? Are there galaxies on those floors? What force do those galaxies do to operate?
above are some inferences made by me based on Newton's universal gravity.
, let’s take a look at Hawking. Of course, Hawking is not the founder of the Big Bang, but he is famous, so let’s take him as a representative figure!
Of course, I just have a little doubt on the Big Bang of .
Hawking said: Looking from Hubble to all directions, all galaxies are moving away from us. Therefore, he believes that this is an important basis for the Big Bang.
Some people say: The universe originated from an singularity explosion 13.82 billion years ago (some people say it is 13.7 billion years). Someone also drew a model picture of the Big Bang - like a horizontal clock with a slightly larger hole and also indicated the expansion of each period.
So, since it is an explosion or expanding in all directions, I would like to ask: Ahead, we said that the planets orbit around the sun; the solar system orbits around the silver nucleus; the Milky Way orbits around the extra-river galaxy... These are all horizontal, and only one floor - although it is ridiculously high. There should be many other galaxies that go far away from all directions that are not on this floor, but on countless floors up and down. How do they operate? Is it only running horizontally? Are there any galaxies that operate vertically? If so, who are they controlled by gravity and centrifugal forces?
How many people have provided jobs for the Big Bang? With this theory, many people talked and wrote books to establish their own theories. Some people also say that the observable diameter of the universe has reached 93 billion light years (meaning that the observable radius is 46.5 billion light years). So, what instrument is used to observe this observable radius? What did you see at 5 light-years from the earth? If you see well-documented galaxies or nebula from there, it proves that the universe was not born 13.82 billion years ago. Because you want to see galaxies 46.5 billion light-years away from the Earth, their light will reach the Earth 46.5 billion years.At that time, the universe had not been born yet, so who emitted it? Ghost?
Some people say that the speed of the universe has expanded beyond the speed of light, so the boundaries of the universe have now exceeded 13.82 billion light years. This is a bit unreasonable. Because any object exceeds the speed of light is invisible to our existing instruments. (Of course, I don’t think it doesn’t necessarily exist if it doesn’t see it) Perhaps the universe is even wider than our current observable diameter of 93 billion light years? Because the explanation about the universe in the "Modern Chinese Dictionary" is: the universe represents space - boundless; the universe represents time - no beginning or end.
Perhaps the universe was really not born 13.82 billion years ago, and the big explosion could not produce so many regular gravitational movements. Even according to Einstein's general theory of relativity in , in order to make a coin reach the speed of light, infinite thrust is required. What's more, the mass of matter in the universe is far more than one coin. The singularity wants to push these matter out at the speed of light. How powerful is that?
Besides, if the universe was produced by the Singularity Big Bang, then the universe should be formed with the Singularity as the center, and its expansion speed should be basically the same. From the earth, the speed of galaxies moving from all directions should be different: galaxies moving in the same direction as the earth should not be faster than galaxies moving in the opposite direction (with the singularity as the starting point). The Hubble telescope should be able to distinguish the difference in these two speeds - if there is no obvious speed difference in galaxies far away from the earth from all directions, then the Big Bang is still unconvincing.
