reported that under the framework of the joint meeting on scientific research integrity construction attended by 21 departments, the Ministry of Science and Technology, together with multiple departments, established a joint working mechanism, formed a high-level review expert group, and carried out serious investigation and handling. The investigation and processing results are reported as follows ↓↓
Academician Cao Xuetao of Nankai University
No fraud, plagiarism or plagiarism of papers was found to have misuse of pictures
For the Internet questioning Academician Cao Xuetao's 63 papers, no fraud, plagiarism or plagiarism were found to have misuse of pictures, reflecting that the laboratory management was not rigorous.
After review by the joint working mechanism, it was decided to cancel Academician Cao Xuetao's qualification to apply for the national science and technology plan project for one year, cancel the qualification to review experts as scientific and technological activities supported by financial funds for one year, and cancel the qualification to recruit graduate students for one year. He was instructed to respond to questions and conduct errata on the questioned papers, make a profound inspection of existing problems, and report criticism in the corresponding academic department of the Academy of Engineering.
Professor Li Hongliang of Wuhan University
No fraud was found, and there was no misuse of pictures in the paper.
The Internet questioned Professor Li Hongliang's 21 papers. After investigation, no fraud was found, but it was found that many papers had misuse of pictures, which reflected that the experimental data was not rigorous.
After review by the joint working mechanism, it was decided to cancel Professor Li Hongliang's qualification to apply for the national science and technology plan project for 2 years, cancel the qualification to evaluate the science and technology activities as a financial funding expert, and cancel the qualification to recruit graduate students for 2 years, and instruct him to make a profound inspection of the existing problems.
Researcher Geng Meiyu, Shanghai Institute of Drugs, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
No fraud was found, and a small number of images were misused
A questioned the five papers of Geng Meiyu on the Internet. After investigation, no fraud was found, but it was found that a small number of images were misused in the paper.
After review by the joint working mechanism, it was decided to criticize and educate him and remind him of scientific research integrity.
Academician Pei Gang of the Chinese Academy of Sciences did not find any fraud in the dissertation of Academician Pei Gang
A paper questioned by the Internet for one of the papers, but no fraud was found after investigation.
Professor Rao Yi’s paper was not found for fraud
The Internet questioned Professor Rao Yi’s two papers used by the Natural Science Foundation project, but no fraud was found for investigation.
▌Source of this article: CCTV News (ID: CCTV News)
CCTV reporter/Wu Wei Lei Biao
Source: CCTV News
