Source: China Jingwei.com
Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen. (File photo) Image source: Taiwan's "China Times News Network"
According to Taiwan's "China Times News Network", Lin Huanqiang, a scholar in the United States who continues to track the "essay scandal" of Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen, yesterday (June 22nd) Announced a big news on Facebook , pointing out that LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science ) was recently slapped in the face by the British Administrative Tribunal. It was found that LSE provided false information to the Taiwanese legal department and asked LSE to respond again within 28 days. Reporter Richardson's past requests.
Lin Huanqiang said that in the past, when responding to the investigation inquiry of the ICO (the Office of the British Information Special Officer), the highest authority of the LSE denied having Tsai Ing-wen’s so-called "list of doctoral oral examination committee members" and "oral examination report", accidentally leaking the LSE legal director Mr. Hain has been questioned in the past for colluding with false documents across the sea, and the British Administrative Tribunal of First Instance certified the so-called "Hain's collusion incident" in its judgment issued on June 20 this year!
Lin Huanqiang pointed out that in the British first instance Under the investigation of Administrative Court Judge McKenna, he found that LSE held 278 pages of files related to "Student Tsai Ing-wen". One of the letters claimed to be one of Tsai Ing-wen's oral examination committee members, but did not mention other oral examination committee members. , and has not been confirmed by the official notice of University of London; the information provided by Mr. Hayne in the email on December 16, 2020 may be inaccurate; and Richardson has submitted that Mr. Hayne emailed to the British ICO on December 16, 2020, However, the British ICO did not consult the LSE about this, and it is obviously still unable to confirm the source of the email.
Lin Huanqiang said that the above three points of investigation showed that LSE legal director Mr. Hain made a false report out of thin air and illegally reported two LSE teachers (Mr. Michael Elliott and Professor Leonard Leigh) to impersonate Tsai Ing-wen’s fictitious doctoral oral examination committee members.
In addition, Lin Huanqiang exposed two judgments made by Judge McKenna based on the investigation. The first is that the Administrative Tribunal found that the ruling notice (IC-109451-SIM2) issued by the British ICO on November 26 last year was wrong; The second is that LSE must respond to Richardson's request to disclose the "doctoral oral examination committee" and "oral examination report" within 28 days.
