Actually, this title is very helpless. When did the United States stop robbery?
According to Taiwanese media, as the global "chip shortage" has not eased, the U.S. Department of Commerce held another semiconductor summit last week, requiring participating TSMC , Samsung and other wafer foundries to hand over what are considered commercial Confidential inventory, orders, sales records and other data. The reason is to improve chip "supply chain transparency."
Korean media commented that this may weaken the bargaining power and competitiveness of large manufacturers. When asked about , what should I do if the manufacturer does not cooperate? U.S. Commerce Secretary Raimondo threatened: "Our toolbox has many ways to allow companies to hand over data. Although we don't want to get to that point, we will definitely take action if necessary."
Korean media revealed , the U.S. government is considering using the " Defense Production Act " as a legal basis to force relevant companies to submit data. Have you seen ? American law is a tool used by the American government to rob other people's wealth. Is the United States’ wishful thinking to “leak” the trade secrets of Samsung and TSMC to Intel and other American companies? The United States previously induced TSMC to set up factories in the United States, and this time it forced it to hand over key data involving core commercial secrets. Taiwanese media believe that the United States will force TSMC to transfer technology to American companies such as Intel to maintain its leadership in the IT field. status.
How are these behaviors in the United States different from bandits? But there is no need to be surprised. This is a method commonly used by the United States. This is how the United States has become strong step by step. The question now for is, why are these companies "willing" to be robbed again and again? Do you feel uncomfortable without being slaughtered by the United States? In particular, TSMC has stepped forward to "respond" to and Trump's call. Are there many "political considerations" in this? Are you actively cooperating with the "DPP authorities" to flatter the United States, or are you being forced by the "DPP authorities" to do so? Now that we have got into the trap, we are like a sheep entering a tiger's mouth, so why don't we let others slaughter us?
It has always been "justifiable" for the United States to engage in this kind of robbery. In the American dictionary, it is called "fierce competition" when it robs you, which is very legitimate. You take advantage of , that is, you "disobey the rules" and you are the one who "provokes conflicts". Therefore, our public opinion method of "exposing its ugly behavior" is basically ineffective.
This reminds Chinese companies to be extra cautious when doing business with the United States. The country must introduce corresponding laws and regulations to protect its own companies. In terms of , China has been forced by the United States to introduce some regulations, but it can continue to be improved. I hope that in the future we will not be forced to do this, but will take the initiative to study US law and how the US government uses the law to engage in plunder, and use this as a basis to proactively introduce countervailing laws and regulations.
In the Meng Wanzhou case, because the state took action, we won in the end, but the Chinese citizen Meng Wanzhou was detained for 1,028 days, which itself is a big price. It is also the intimidation of the Chinese people by the hegemonic United States and its follower Canada. A threat to the people of any country in the world. It's time for to think about how to make the US government afraid to do whatever it wants. This is not only a matter for China, but also for Japan, France, Russia, and all countries in the world except the United States. Logically speaking, the United States is already very powerful, and it will not suffer any loss in fair competition according to international law. But the U.S. government represents the interests of big capital interest groups, and robbery is its nature.
Only if everyone works together to restrict it, can the world have a place for justice. In this sense, building a community with a shared future for mankind is the sunshine road to curb hegemonic behavior and jungle law !
Note: The author of this article is Mou Lin, a core member of "Qin'an Strategic Think Tank". It is an original work for this platform. Reprinting with the source indicated is welcome. Reprinting is an important way to gather the power of the Internet.
