First of all, let me explain first. I may write this series of refutations of " English Church History ". Because to find out the places that seriously do not conform to historical facts in the "History of the English Church", other historical materials are often needed to verify it.
This creates a very embarrassing situation. To criticize the history of the English church, we must find the Byzantine historical materials or even Middle East historical materials, early Arab historical materials. Because I don't want to turn the study of history into a verbal war or even a farce.
In addition, it also means that I have never said that Western history is completely false. I am just proving that certain forces or countries have artificially uplifted the so-called historical achievements of the West for their own purposes. And what I want to do is to find out the so-called history of these artificially elevated people and present the truth to everyone.
is OK, continue now.
In the second chapter of "History of the English Church", Mr. Bide clearly records that in 55 BC, Emperor Caesar wanted to expedition to British with only eighty ships, and lost most of the ships after his defeat. But after only one winter, six hundred ships had been built to attack again.
A simple example can be seen that although Mr. Bied grew up in the island country of Britain, he did not understand ships at all! Let's not discuss whether the Rome had the ability to build six hundred ships in one winter. In fact, it can be seen from the first expedition that there were only eighty ships in Caesar that shipbuilding is definitely not easy for Ancient Roman ! If it were easy, there wouldn't be only eighty boats on the first expedition.
Since it is not easy to build a ship, How did the Romans build six hundred ships in one winter? Bless by God? Oh, it wasn't right, Rome at that time did not believe in God.
Moreover, Mr. Bied would not be so ignorant that he thought that the wood could be cut down and built a ship, right? Use such wood to build a ship? Does Mr. Bied think that the Romans died too few?
A common sense is that if the wood is cut, it will take a long time of air drying and shaping before it can be used to build a ship. Mr. Bied doesn't even understand this? Or do the Romans don’t understand?
In short, Mr. Bid only records that winter when the Romans suddenly built six hundred ships. I don’t know how it was built. It is exactly the same as the ancient Egyptians suddenly built a pyramid.
The funny thing is that Mr. Bied's description of the details of the war is just as good as the expressions of soldiers, but it is just a note of Roman man-made ships.
And in Chapter 3, Mr. Bied clearly records that the Romans occupied most parts of Britain
However, the current data believe that the Romans occupied half of Britain at most, that is, England
The funniest thing is that these two conclusions were actually based on the same historical materials!
The above two examples may be just minor errors and it is difficult to make people excited. Then, let’s get a dose of hot stuff!
In Chapter 4, King Lucius of Britain actually wrote a letter to the Roman emperor, hoping to become a Christian!
Sorry? You are not wrong? In the early days of Christianity entering Rome, it was a heretic theory that was suppressed and persecuted. OK
Although some rich people joined later, one is the minority, and two is the rich, not the officials! You, a local leader of the Roman Empire, actually told the emperor that you want to join a cult? Don't want to get stuck? Even later compilers couldn't stand the nonsense records like
. They added notes below to believe that this "Lucius" was not the King of Britain at all, but Lucius, the lord of Belshadows of Mesopotamia .
Bersha birtha was actually distorted into Britain, Western scholars are really rigorous! Moreover, Belsha is just a small town and is actually called King of Britain! Upgrade directly! Mesopotamia was moved directly to Britain! admire!
In fact, it can be seen from this that if Mr. Bied had really existed and had written such a book, it would be just a hearsay and made up based on other people's rumors.Such a book was actually used to make history?
(To be continued)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-