text丨Shanhan
Edit丨Shanhan
Ape Economy and Sovereignty Transfer
937 , Basil O'Connor urgently wrote to White House . "The attached copy of the Paul de Kroof telegram might sound interesting to you, but it's not funny at all," he joked about .
De Kroof Telegram the day before :
About lifting restrictions on experiments on monkey Henry Tefries Our main dealer 3215 Fulton Street in New York City has 2000 monkeys ready to ship, he received a notice before restrictions came into effect, I wonder if you can do anything through White House urging the State Department to facilitate the release of this batch of studies .
Last month, The Indian government issued a customs notice prohibiting the export of monkeys in March to March from the “ hot weather” from html to March.
Decluf learned of the restriction from New York City dealer Henry Tefries, who in turn learned of the news from his Kolkata agent.
U.S. White House
When O'Connor wrote to the White House , angry Trey Flich had already passed the news to his clients at scientific institutions across the country.
The letters from researchers quickly poured into the offices of President , surgeons and secretary of state , and urged the U.S. government to intervene.
Finance Director of the University of Chicago emphasized the "incompetent" role of rhesus monkey in a series of scientific research and declared that this situation is "urgent".
He added , the overlap of the restriction period and summer exacerbated the emergency, when the outbreak of polio was most likely, monkeys were needed the most. Scientists from other institutions have worked to explain to U.S. officials the dependence on rhesus monkeys .
For example, University of Wisconsin Bacterologist Paul Clark noted that while monkeys from South America are useful in some research areas, “In the majority of studies on Polio and Yellow Fever , only Indian monkeys are susceptible to .”
html , for example, the bacterium bacteriologists from South America are not working in some research areas, but the Washington officials sent a telegram to the U.S. Consulate in Calcutta, in order to resolve the issue before the outbreak of the summer epidemic.
Trevorlich's agent in Kolkata has contacted U.S. Consul General, and began lobbying the Indian government's United States Department of Foreign Affairs on the urgency of the situation.
The same period , Dekrov lobbied by telegram . By the end of May, their efforts paid off and the Indian government granted tefris special permission to ship his existing 2000 monkeys.
However, the limit still exists in . In this sense, the 1937 " state of emergency " heralds the exemption negotiations that will arrive in the summer.
National Polio Foundation (NFIP) is increasingly at the heart of these efforts to ensure export exemptions from what Fris calls the “autonomous government of India”.
, supported by Orientalist imagination, , Tefries' adoption of the word marks 's vague understanding of how anti-colonial nationalism reshapes India's fuzzy understanding of how nationalism reshaped India in the 1930s.
For ten years, it will be held in the mainland of for the second , and animal dealers will encounter Gandhi 's citizen disobedience movement and political representation competition at the roundtable.
Following the 1935 constitutional reform and reorganization of the central/provincial government and expanding voters, Indian Congress just won the provincial election in 1937.
Even if nationalists criticized reforms that maintained the control of the Empire , the victory also strengthened Congress' challenge to British rule.Tefries often warns scientists about the upcoming restrictions imposed by the "local autonomous government in India", reflecting concerns about how the shift in sovereign configuration of might reconfigure the United States to obtain experimental organism .
WWII and 1947 India-Pakistan partition exacerbated the uncertainty of this scientific participant network , further motivating them to find research alternatives to rhesus monkeys.
The late colonial state strengthens regulation of monkey trade in itself is a response to the network of transimperial actors.
Starting in the mid-1920s , sensational news reports about the monkey trade sparked protests from Indian legislators , British MPs, Hindu and Jain organizations, Association for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals and Anti-Vivodia groups throughout the empire.
As Empire more widely focused on the governance of religious sentiment, protests alarmed colonial bureaucrats.
Interior officials finally believe that is too much about , but it is recommended to monitor exports to to ease future controversy .
It is precisely because of the continued attention to the welfare of animals in during the transportation of that the Central Colonial Government restricted the export of monkeys in 1937 in "hot weather" html.
However, while concerns over Hindu sentiment led colonial officials to notice the monkey trade , they did not regard the restriction as a complete ban on exports.
Once they understand that these monkeys are for " real medical research" , colonial officials will not express their sympathy for their American counterparts .
For example, was shipped in 1937 by Henry Tefries, and they also shortened the limit period to April to August .
Prady's analysis of the politics of animal experiments in colonies in India helps to determine the regulatory prospects for officials .
Chakabati believes that the scientific civilized commitment strengthens anti-viviparousists' protests against colonial laboratory experiments and intensifies the pathological as the real root of animal cruelty.
Similarly, Although colonial officials expressed different uneasiness of on how to interpret the export of monkeys, they did not particularly object to the export of monkeys for their study.
937 negotiations assured the U.S. Consul General that the colonial government would consider future export exemption requests .
Consul General further reported that the conversation with the Ministry of Home Affairs reassured him that " Hindu feeling " opposed "the use of the monkeys that exported as sacred or quasi-sacred animals" and not the monkeys themselves.
In fact, " Indian complaints" seem to be "much less than the American Anti-Vivodissection Association 's appeal to the Indian government to stop exports."
Despite this , Washington State Department officials will still point out the "Hindu feeling" and advocate for to apply for exemption in the next few years in a cautious way.
Their emphasis on religious beliefs marks a disconnect between the United States and colonial countries' interpretation of export politics, even if both rely on stable imagination of local beliefs .
For U.S. officials, the religious turmoil and logistical unpredictability of the situation are intertwined. Officials found it was still difficult to convince the colonial government that the urgency of the request was still difficult, as British was not the main importer.
Out of caution, Washington officials began asking for evidence of monkey shortage, and then contacted the Indian government during the restricted period.
's demand for evidence translates into suspicion of animal dealer , like Tefries.
For example, in 940 , officials concluded that Tefries’ claims about the shortage were exaggerated and may be related to the separate commercial interests of imported python .
But after notifying Tehl3Fries they would not intervene, they were once again overwhelmed by letters from scientists, who insisted that "this situation poses a threat to the public health of ".
plus NFIP participation, lobbying promotes to reevaluate . When Basil O'Connor wrote to confirm the severity of the shortage of , diplomats in Washington and Kolkata quickly took the action to request exemption of .
This event reflects 's expertise in shaping trade and authoritative dynamics. If NFIP officials and researchers rely on Tefries’ knowledge of the monkey market, then animals rely on their scientific legality to conduct business across continents through dealers.
O'Connor in his letter supporting Teferris mentioned how World War II brought new challenges to American scientist to provide experimental organisms. As the war hits center and peripheral , global shipping interrupts .
India's imperial mobilization for war is rebuilding port cities like Kolkata where expropriation and shipping violations will exacerbate famine in 1943 .
Kolkata-Indian slum
Meanwhile, The entire empire seafarers are on strike . NFIP officials on the East Coast of the United States have been paying attention to the impact of these developments on polio .
Limited transport opportunities increase the captain's willingness to transport monkeys from Kolkata. As the war continues , NFIP's Richard Chalok visited the State Department, lobbying for shipping space.
When the official asked the foundation if it could switch to the rhesus monkey community transferred by primate zoologist Clarence Ray Carpenter in Puerto Rico , Chalok explained the problem: colonies cost about $75, while monkeys from India priced at $10 .
Despite the interruption and the sinking of goods, importing monkeys from India is still an economic need for .
NFIP Officials regard their negotiations on these wartime challenges as an achievement and a research question, and requires to find alternatives.
Annual Report drum blows their efforts to transport monkeys "regardless of the difficulties and dangers of war" has "far-reaching benefits". However, these reports also point to the benefits of eliminating research dependence on rhesus monkeys.
A report directly links the urgency of " looking for experimental animals to replace or supplement the use of rhesus monkeys" to "state of the world". The Foundation's Virus Research Committee Chairman Thomas Rivers later claimed that during this period, he "had repeatedly vowed that almost all animals we could contact had polio."
He specifically mentioned Charles Armstrong cultivated polio virus lansing strains in rodents, which are insensitive to other types of polio virus , and studied gerbil from the Sahara desert .
gerbil
For the wider empire field used in the search for alternatives, Rivers said , "animals of the world" were tested. Despite this , "the search was not successful, monkeys are still is a problem with the foundation."
While polio researchers continued to look for answers to this question, other trade arrangements also changed. To further regulate wartime shipping, the Indian government of began to require additional licenses for to export monkeys during non-restricted periods.
regulation messages immediately caused alertness in NFIP . However, after the diplomatic recurrence in the fall of 1941, the organization was allowed to transport 2,000 monkeys in the "open season" and 2,000 monkeys in the "closed season". Annual updates for licenses and exemptions involve similar to negotiations for the remainder of the war .
As the end of the war heralds the end of South Asian empire rule , U.S. officials expressed new concerns about the supply of monkeys .
This war left Britain heavily in debt and inspired anti-colonialism demands. After the British quickly withdrew from the mainland , the large-scale immigration and bleeding incidents that were divided in 1947.
NFIP Now consider the violent transition from British colonies to independent India and Pakistan may affect monkey trade .
After the Foundation representative heard rumors of an impending shortage at at in 1947, the State Council investigated the Kolkata agent of Tefris and concluded that :
The supply of monkeys from in United Province may be interrupted, because the hunters are all Muslims, and because of community riots in Delhi and surrounding areas, Muslims have moved out of the province in large numbers.
Hindus flooded into the region from Pakistan causing chaos and because of Indian worship of monkeys , Muslim hunters are nervous about continuing their activities .
As an example of US medical welfare non-human exports take precedence over South Asian human welfare , U.S. officials cite the risks experienced by Muslim hunters, mainly seeing partitioned violence as a threat to monkey supply .
Focus on violence between Hindus and Muslims further consolidates the understanding of the issue of trade labor and politics as essential religious differences.
If officials evaluated religious sentiment more tentatively in the past few years, then they now put the issue back in a single framework.
For example, When they discuss how to continue to obtain export exemptions, State Council officials declared "Hindu worship of monkeys is largely the reason for the implementation of the export embargo in the hot summer ."
Behind such a clear assessment is the uncertainty about how Indian independence will affect future negotiations.
Despite NFIP's efforts in searching for alternative in the 1940s, polio researchers still rely on rhesus monkeys from India.
In the next few years, the anxiety about monkey trade was combined with the development of tissue culture technology, which quickly changed the use of living organisms and cells in polio research.
