"S people pay their lives, and pay their debts" is a common saying that has been passed down since ancient times. In our country, no matter whether you die a bad person or not, as long as you kill someone, you will be sentenced to death. Nowadays, with the continuous progress and development of society, 70% of countries have abolished the death penalty system. Why is our country still implementing the death penalty system? Why not abolish it?
The second instance upheld the original verdict, and Lao Rongzhi will undoubtedly die!
The highly anticipated case of Lao Rongzhi finally settled on November 30. After the second instance verdict of the Jiangxi Higher People's Court, Lao Rongzhi is undoubtedly dead this time. Such a result is undoubtedly a great pleasure for both the people and the victim's family. In 1996, Lao Rongzhi and Fa Ziying left Jiujiang . Since then, the two have been in many places, and has involved 7 murders.
Fa Ziying was executed in 1999, and Lao Rongzhi has been absconding for 20 years. During this period, Lao Rongzhi had undergone plastic surgery many times and made a living by selling alcohol in Fujian, , Xiamen and other places. When he was arrested, Lao Rongzhi also talked to customers and sold watches.
For the death penalty of Lao Rongzhi, many netizens left messages saying: "From another perspective, there is no ghost in the world, otherwise I would have asked it for revenge." "Support the death penalty for Lao Rongzhi! It's great to be satisfied!" "I deserve it, and it's right to execute the death penalty in China. If you want to go abroad, you may not be sentenced to death." "Lao Rongzhi is extremely evil and should be sentenced to death." " Chinese law is fair and just. As long as S person, you must be sentenced to death. Lao Rongzhi is extremely evil and the death penalty is well sentenced!"
Why doesn't China abolish the death penalty?
Lao Rongzhi was sentenced to death because she was self-defeated. It is natural for S to pay her life. But now, there are still some calls to suggest that our country abolish the death penalty and align with those EU countries that focus on human rights. It can be said that there has always been controversy over whether the death penalty will be abolished.
People who oppose the abolition of the death penalty believe that having the death penalty restriction will better maintain the stability of social order, which is a very effective warning. With this kind of restrictive warning, no one will take the risk of going to S. Some people also believe that S person pays his life and that the death penalty can comfort the relationship between the victim's family. Those who agree that the death penalty has been abolished believe that the death penalty deprives human rights is a very cruel thing.
So, why doesn’t our country abolish the death penalty? In fact, the most representative thing that does not abolish is that the death penalty of is punitive , which is a power granted by the law and the punishment that can deprive a person of his life. At present, , the Amendment to the Criminal Law of my country, , 89, successively abolished 22 death penalty for death, and 46 crimes were also charged with death penalty. It can be seen that the death penalty is deterrent. Those who commit crimes will not dare to act recklessly due to the constraints of the death penalty.
In addition, the death penalty is still targeted. Only criminals who are extremely evil and seriously endanger others and social security will be sentenced to death. my country's current attitude towards the death penalty is that only the Supreme People's Court has strict control and cautious application of the death penalty, unified the right to approve death penalty cases, and insists on retaining the death penalty.
On the psychological level, the death penalty has a pacifying effect. , especially the punishment of criminals who are extremely guilty by the death penalty. This method can calm public anger, play a pacifying role, and make up for the feelings for the victim's family.
What about other countries that abolish the death penalty?
1. Zhao Doushun's release from prison and returned to society has caused public anger
As we all know, South Korea is a country with a death penalty but equivalent to nothing. Even if S people set fire to South Korea, they will be for life imprisonment at most. As the prototype criminal of " So-won ", Zhao Doushun was released from prison and returned to society, which aroused public anger. In 2008, Zhao Doushun kidnapped and forced J to J an 8-year-old elementary school girl, causing her disability. Because Zhao Doo-soon was only 68 years old at that time, the judge sentenced him to 12 years in prison for his age to be unstable after drinking. This result made the victim's family and even the whole society dissatisfied, which aroused public outrage.
Before this, Zhao Doosuke had a lot of criminal records. His files already included 17 criminal records of Qiang J and S., and he is a complete pervert. Now, although Cho Doo-soon has been living at home after being released from prison, it has made the Korean people feel very panicked, and the neighbors nearby are also suffering.
A neighbor introduced: "It's really bad to be a neighbor with such a pervert. It's a bit better during the day, but we don't dare to go out at night. At present, I'm also considering moving to my daughter's house. It's really dangerous to have him in the place." Many Korean netizens also scolded him: "I shouldn't have let this murderer come out at all. I actually let him live in this world, which is a threat to society."
"This treatment seems like he is not a demon who ruins other people's lives, but he is like a big shot." "The children of chaebol families have bodyguards, so the government does not care whether children from ordinary families are dangerous? They should not be released." It can be seen that for South Korea, which does not have the death penalty, dangerous people like Cho Doo-soon, even if they are released from prison after being sentenced and 24-hour surveillance is implemented, it is also a huge threat to society.
2. Criminals in the Yute Island tragedy in Norway were admitted to university
Norway is the country that attaches the most importance to human rights in the world. It not only abolished the death penalty, but also abolished life imprisonment. In Norwegian prisons, humanized management is very well-established. The guilty person is locked up here, which is equivalent to being more comfortable than living outside. There are not only supermarkets, gyms, and various entertainment facilities in the prison, where you can even get into college as long as you work hard.
, and the , which has always insisted on opposing the abolition of the death penalty, used 500 kilograms of explosives to directly blow up the central government building. 8 government personnel were bombed and more than 200 injured , but Brevik still felt unsatisfied. He also went to to pretend to be a policeman in the island to shoot the youth summer camp. Two crimes caused a total of 77 deaths. It can be seen that Brevik is challenging the bottom line of Norway's legal system.
Finally after trial, he was sentenced to 21 years in prison. After being imprisoned, Brevik lived in a three-bedroom apartment, which not only had a living room, kitchen, bathroom, and a special gym. During his sentence, in order to pass the time, he also worked hard to get into the University of Oslo, the best school in Norway. In Norway, prisons are already their best destination for some serious criminals.
Norwegian prison
Generally speaking, prisons are terrible for people who have never committed crimes. For some habitual prisoners, they have lost their deterrence. Only the death penalty can make habitual prisoners feel feared. Not abolishing the death penalty is the protection of the people and the foundation for maintaining social stability. Only the death penalty can make those criminals afraid to look up and feel fear. Only the death penalty can make everyone live in a bright world.
