Chairman Mao: The enemy is coming, I advocate fighting, otherwise I will run away. These two ideas are often expressed by one person when discussing war. After a long period of struggle within the party and lessons from objective facts, such as fighting, being injured, and running away and failing, it gradually changed.
This is the manifestation of this person's use of the stake analysis method. Because of the profit, you have to fight for it and fight it; if you can't fight, you will find that the harm is too great, so you run away, and running away will lead to failure.
Chairman Mao: However, in the five wars, the simple defensive line arising from fear of fortification... has transformed us from mobile warfare to positional warfare, and this method of positional warfare is only beneficial to the enemy, but is extremely unfavorable to the current Workers' and Peasants' Red Army.
This is the manifestation of decision makers using the stake analysis method. Because it is not good, they are afraid and have to defend against harm.
Chairman Mao: Due to the excessive estimate of enemy fortificationism and insufficient estimate of mobile warfare, victory can only start with tactical theory, thinking that only tactical victory can be transformed into battle victory, and then the victory in battle can cause changes that are strategically beneficial to us.
stake analysis method brings no strategy and no overall situation, and take one step at a time.
Chairman Mao: Fortressism has exhausted the enemy's forces and dispersed it, and has cultivated the enemy's dependence on fortresses, which makes them lose their confidence in victory when they leave the fortress. At the same time, the enemy cannot move forward to us without leaving the fortress.
stake analysis method leads to invisible big things, unable to grasp the opportunity, and losing one's own possibility.
Chairman Mao: Just defense and "short attack", victory does not depend mainly on the correct leadership of strategic battles, but only on tactics. In fact, it is just a surrender to fortificationism, and it cannot be crushed.
stake analysis method does not rely on strategy to win, but blames the level of the people below (and the level cannot be improved in a short time), and the result is even more helpless. In fact, it was the white flag to "harm", so it was "actually just a surrender to fortificationism."
Chairman Mao: But at the same time, we must understand another principle, that is, in order to carry out a long-term protracted war, we must strive for a quick decision in the situation for every "encirclement and suppression" and every battle.
stake analysis method, there will be situations where small damage will be caused by the big damage on your own side, that is, internal injuries will occur, and an outbreak will occur at a certain time, or even abortion will be done.
Chairman Mao: The future of the development of a simple defensive line: either desperate and desperate, or escapist, and there must be nothing else. The future of
stake analysis method: either pounce on it at all costs or run away in panic, it is completely passive and is led by someone. And the opponent can easily set up baits and set traps to make one's side enter a desperate situation.
Use stake analysis method :
1. When the weak face the strong, they will make wrong decisions and responses. (The harm is great at this time)
2. When the strong face the weak, they will underestimate the profit and ignore the harm, and may lose the profit and suffer from the harm. (The profit is small at this time, but the harm is just beginning)
3. Because it highlights the harm, it produces negative effects, and the ability to mobilize and control strength is poor.
4. It is much short-sighted, trapped in the interests of the near, and cannot see the interests of the far. (If you can see the distant interests, it is also very powerful)
The correct response is : creates conditions (this is preparation) to make things move towards its opposite (this is strategy).
Role, status is easy
1. You are encircling me in the overall situation, and I am also encircling you in the local area. (The first three anti-encirclement and suppression)
2. You surround me, I surround you in the local area. (The first three anti-encirclement and suppression)
3. If you attack my base, I will also attack your base, and the troops will go out to Jiangsu and Zhejiang. (The fifth encirclement and suppression was not adopted)
4. From abandon to take, first and then take.(The first three anti-encirclement and suppression)
...
Nature and situation are mutually reciprocal
1. You move from concentration to scatter, and I move from dispersion to concentration. (War of Liberation)
2. You go from being decided to being decided, and I go from being decided to being decided. ( Korean War )
3. I go from a small amount to a large amount of dominance, you go from a springboard to a rope to a noose to hanging . (Related Decisions of Kinmen)
...
Of course, the premise of all this is:
In terms of construction, dialectics believes that the "one side" and the opposite "other side" are mutually generated and formed. For example, the more favorable "spear" leads to a stronger "shield"; the stronger "shield" leads to a more favorable "spear"; that is, the "spear" and the "shield" are mutually generated and formed.
, that is, C causes D, and D causes C
dialectics is called oppositional unity .
In ancient times, it was called mutual complementation and mutual generation and mutual transformation.
modern term, also known as positive feedback loop, negative feedback loop.
As long as C is increased, this is the work content. After that, C and D have gained their own lives and have developed, promoted and grown to a great extent.
(I made a mistake after liberation: Industry and agriculture are not related to each other. Agriculture is insufficient to become an industry. Engagement in agriculture cannot support the consumption of industrial products. The demand pull is insufficient, which makes it difficult for industry to develop.)
or above is dialectics used in construction.
Dialectics believes that "lack, lack" of "a certain side" is the main contradiction. Because of the "lack, lack, and insufficient" of the "one side", it leads to imbalance with the "other side", which creates contradictions; for example, if the spear is not strong enough, it will lead to the shield being not strong enough, and the shield being not strong enough, and the corresponding result will also lead to the spear not strong enough. Therefore, the "side" of "lack, lack, and insufficient" is the main contradiction. The solution is to develop and supplement the "side", and then make the two become mutually beneficial.
or above is dialectics used in the diagnostic positioning aspects of problems and directions.
Chairman Mao: For example, I am not smarter than others, but I understand dialectics and can use dialectics to analyze problems. I will understand problems that I don’t understand by using dialectics. I must learn to use dialectics, which has a great effect.
Chairman Mao: Although I can't do it, I finally analyzed some of our experience. You should surpass me.
Because others use the stake analysis method, they think Chairman Mao is a genius.
Because in the eyes of dialectics, there is no absolute harm or absolute benefit, Chairman Mao can use responses that cannot be understood by ordinary people in absent-minded manner, but he can find the basis in dialectics.
