is unblocked at 12 o'clock tonight. It is also the time when people can calm down and think about things late at night. I have been bothered by some things recently, and I didn’t understand it until tonight, so I nodded immediately because I was afraid of forgetting it.
Tonight I thought of the investment proportion. We are an entrepreneurial team. Because we used to do projects based on investment proportion, we often didn’t find a suitable share method, and we couldn’t get out the proportion of funds and did not occupy the corresponding share. Therefore, after the crash, the project initiator is prone to forced withdrawal of shares to pure capital stocks, or even kicked out of the pure capital stock. I think this phenomenon should exist in many partners. There is an algorithm to communicate with you. Here we take the total investment of 500,000 yuan for
project in an example. The initiator of the project took two people to find the project and the site to provide equipment in one month. Here we count as a salary of 8,000 per person, which is 16,000. The equipment required for the project is calculated at a premium of 30%. Assuming that the equipment actually costs 350,000 yuan for 50 projects, then according to the premium method, it is 350,000*130%=455,000 yuan, and the labor salary is 16,000 yuan, and according to the premium method, it is 16,000*130%=20,800 yuan. There is also a tea drink fee, PR fee, and operating fee of 2.42 for the time being. This can be recorded without a premium.
The investor is divided into 3 square meters, two pure capital parties, one project initiator, and the two pure capital parties contribute 200,000 yuan respectively, accounting for 80%. The project initiator accounts for the remaining 20%.
Isn’t this easy to storm in capital contribution and shareholding? Let's see if this logic is feasible? Is it a pseudo-algorithm?
