Does the removal of Tiga Ultraman mean that similar works will be removed from the shelves? Obviously not

Original author: Han Xin. Qin Louyue

Tiga Altman was removed from the entire network because its content was suspected of armed assault, multi-person intimidation, arson and explosion and other violent plots. In fact, although as a classic in the Ultraman series, Ultraman Tiga’s plot gives people a positive energy guide, and at the same time, the story gathered by the plot is more independent and independent. Friendship and cooperation have negative educational significance, but in terms of content dissemination, there are indeed the aforementioned violent plots.

But this is the fact. Although Tiga Ultraman, as a childhood memory of many people, also makes us believe in "light", but under the current standardized animation grading system, it faces different The crowd does need to make some standardized sorting. Perhaps for the parents, they simply feel that certain pictures of fighting violence are not suitable for children to watch; perhaps for the viewers who love Diga Ultraman, they simply like the worldview of this work. In fact, there is no conflict between the two. Ultraman Tiga was removed from the shelves just to not affect the children!

So when Tiga Ultraman is removed, will other works of the same type be removed?

At present, the official response given by the platform is the rectification of the content standardization, which means that there is still the possibility of listing after the rectification is completed. The status of Ultraman Tiga in China is unmatched by other series of works. After all, it was introduced by the TV station with copyright. Many of the post-90s friends watched the series of Ultraman Tiga on the TV channel.

and other works of the same type, such as the Ultraman and Kamen Rider series except Tiga. These are special dramas that have been introduced in the country.Positioning is also an animation type. But it is far from the introduction of Ultraman Tiga.

First of all, some other websites are copyrighted. The imported works of the Ultraman and Kamen Rider series are only copyrighted on this website and do not involve the broadcasting of TV programs. One of the highlights of the video website is that when watching these copyrighted animation works, it is necessary to have membership rights, and under the current review of the new regulations, there are obvious age groups for many works. Under normal circumstances Children will not be involved. After all, this is not like a fixed broadcast on a TV channel, and a video website is of an on-demand nature.

Secondly, with the extraction of some of the key opinions in the following animations, the next step will be to improve the relevant review standards for children's animations. For some works that do not meet the requirements , Will be rectified. In other words, the type of animation that belongs to children will have clear scene requirements. Let's just say that it is the Ultraman series. Maybe children can't watch it, but it can be watched if it meets the age and requires family members to watch it. (For example, when I was a kid watching the US version of Transformers , he indicated that some chapters need to be accompanied by parents to watch).

Therefore, there is no need to worry about other similar works being removed from the shelves

The animations currently removed from the shelves are rectified and removed according to the response given by the platform. As for whether they will be re-listed in the future, just Look at the effectiveness and specific classification of subsequent rectification. Then, as other similar works that have not been introduced by domestic TV stations and are broadcast regularly, the import copyright belongs to the third-party video website, and it is in the form of on-demand, which completely depends on the audience.

Of course,For the domestic network audiovisual sector, the temporary removal is correct, because this will regulate the overall requirements of the industry. Let audiences of different ages be able to accurately match and choose the animation content that suits them. Good works will continue to circulate, because it is recognized by everyone, and poor-quality works will be discarded by the audience even if they are on the shelves!

Summary:

For the analysis and guidance of the animation content, I have to provide this point of praise for the analysis and guidance of the spiritual culture of the motherland. High-quality audiovisual content is very meaningful to young people. Regardless of the focus, at least it is for us to watch animation, and to see healthy, high-quality, and helpful animations. To achieve this goal, in addition to personal choice, the guidance of correct values ​​is also very important!