" Heart-warming Offer4" After the construction season aired, it became increasingly difficult to understand the various operations of the interns and the observation team. Regarding the "Heart-warming Offer" series, I believe that many viewers, like me, always have a "white moonlight" filter for the program. After all, there were once a group of high-spirited law students who appeared in front of us. Now that the fourth construction season has aired, many new problems have emerged, and the program team is facing increasing controversy.
First of all, the controversy stems from the amateurism and unprofessionalism of the artist observation group, which is empty and empty. It fails to provide a unified explanation of the key issues in the program video, and there are no important "pain points" to resonate with the audience. The host has insufficient experience in controlling the scene, the cue process becomes the main task, and the selected central argument has no content and content.
This is one, and the other is that the performance of the artist observation group is very unqualified. Guan Xiaotong , Nicholas Tse , Zhang Jie and others have not output rich opinions, and have been complained by netizens many times because their language expression is too weak and pale and unprofessional.
Of course, in addition to the observation team, the editing of the intern internship content this season is also full of deliberateness and public opinion guidance. It not only deliberately edits some interactions between male and female interns, but also adds slow motion and BGM, and the so-called "small movements and eyes patchwork" that does not match the preface and follow-up. Netizens have turned into experts, so that the originally normal male and female exchanges have been transformed into the offer version of "Heartbeat Signal". Just like Jin Zi and Xiao Ma, Yang Xiyan, Chen Guoen and others.
It is undeniable that the powerful alliance is a good choice in the eyes of the audience, but as the old saying goes, as a variety show with positive energy competing for offers, the audience is more willing to see the energy of the interns in the show, and learn from the outstanding them the most balanced state of life and work, and even the relief of stress and some unique thinking patterns.
However, the malicious editing of the program team is not only used in the processing of so-called "cp-eating" videos, but also malicious editing of interns. Audiences who do not know why will be pushed away invisibly. would have known that the variety shows only broadcast what they want the audience to see, including some behaviors that everyone is unanimously angry about. Therefore, it is a contradictory production, and the program team edits it better than anyone else. But is this really the case?
1. Ren Ruoyang, who is highly educated, was dismissed as "good for nothing" in the show.
In particular, Ren Ruoyang from Tsinghua University in Shenzhen and Lin Pengxiang from Beijing Institute of Technology were edited as " Tsinghua poor students". They have no titles but appearances. It can be said that in the first interview "you ask and I answer", Ren Ruoyang has become a poor student in the eyes of the audience.
In the later stage, it was because he struggled to enter the Zhixiang backstage and could not keep up with the various operations of his teammates. He could also cut the video into a dark horse movie. His practical level and ability directly lowered the strength of the entire team. Even his emotional intelligence was very low, so he was disliked by the audience. Later Zhixiang Construction arranged for him to go to Zhixiang Base Camp, which made the audience confused. Why does Ren Ruoyang have him?
The audience only saw the video of the show trying to make us dissatisfied, but ignored his own strength. In fact, from his degree in Tsinghua University, he is already far ahead of many ordinary people. His high academic performance can already prove his excellence. It is just because he is not familiar with vertical operations in the show. It can even be said that vertical design is starting from scratch for him.
So how can a toddler catch up with a child who can already run and is in kindergarten? After understanding his own disadvantages, Ren Ruoyang was able to take the initiative to fight for opportunities. He was able to have the courage to take this step to prove himself, surpassing many of his friends who were not confident and confident. In the subsequent project design of
, he did not "fail" because he did not understand it. Even if it was the simplest thing to start from scratch, he was working hard to do it well. With such perseverance and perseverance, I believe that he will achieve the success he wants in the future.
And the way to evaluate a person is not to just look at the surface.Lin Pengxiang of the Beijing Institute of Technology also suffered from this.
2. Lin Pengxiang was criticized for having low emotional intelligence and was a victim of malicious editing.
Lin Pengxiang's performance can be seen from the first issue. His design level is very high, and he is also very thoughtful, which meets the standards and expectations of a designer in all aspects. In particular, he not only designs personal characteristics, but also can express his work in detail. Not only does he explain clearly, but he also has a sense of storytelling, giving the language charm, and his explanations are more accurate than others.
Therefore, Lin Pengxiang's design is not only favored by the instructor, but also the audience is attracted by his "crazy and arrogant". However, for a fledgling intern, having strength but too much arrogance will also hurt others.
Especially when he was co-designing with Li Guanjia in the third issue, he was in a nonchalant manner throughout the whole process, and his communication with Li Guanjia was also very casual, which made people not only feel disrespectful to the other party, but also very "arrogant" ", he always disagreed with the ideas put forward by others, and due to various reasons such as lack of tacit cooperation, the final project ranking was low. Not only did he not think about the reasons for the failure, but he went straight to the scoring instructor with shocking words, and even bluntly said: "I think the first place should be the last one."
When these words came out, not only the instructors were dumbfounded, but the audience was also angry. After the student exchange in Beijing, he arranged a project again, about "creating a ritual-sense" building. When others said that they would celebrate birthdays with a sense of ritual, he was the only one to reject it, admitting that he hated the sense of ritual, which made the audience feel "pretend".
But among the truly created designs, only his works make everyone’s eyes shine. The relationship between platforms, train stations, and weddings is both romantic and meaningful. Therefore, it is undeniable that Lin Pengxiang’s strong personal ability may not be suitable for teamwork, and there may be problems with his way of speaking, but the real him must not be the “low head” that the audience scolded him.
Especially regarding his first incident, he was accused of being too crazy, with low emotional intelligence and a bad attitude because of his conflicts with his teammate Li Guanjia. But in fact, the relationship between his interns is very harmonious. Lin Pengxiang even wrote various small articles on Weibo praising his companion Xiao Li's cooking skills. He even accepted criticism from netizens politely.
The second thing that the program team targeted at him was that there were obviously traces of editing. He went to the teacher just because he wanted to learn from his experience and wanted to know his own shortcomings or problems in the design. He humbly asked for advice. In the entire program, I only saw him asking the teacher for advice. As for the so-called Lei's speech, it is difficult not to associate it with the program team's troubles. After all, this kind of malicious operation has happened more than once or twice.
So please keep your eyes open, don’t be led by the show crew, understand that a person should not be in a variety show that is true or false, let alone blame others at will, and think twice before acting.
Sakura Maru Momo/author
