Recently I saw such a question: What kind of person is considered a hero?
Generally speaking, we believe that those who have done great things or who have won major victories are considered heroes.
According to this theory, do you think Napoleon is a hero? It should be considered that he has indeed done some big careers. But his final result was a failure.
Don’t look at the great man of history. As an ordinary person, you go from an employee to a supervisor, then become a manager, and finally be promoted to vice president.
Such people are successful in their careers and all stages of life. Do you think such people are heroes? It seems like this kind of life is not a hero.
If you look at it from this point of view, you cannot judge heroes by the success or failure of a person.
Then what kind of person is considered a hero?
saw someone define it like this: Heroes are different from us, not the difference between success and failure, but the standards of success and failure are different.
Read this answer, what is the difference between the success or failure of a hero and the success or failure of ordinary people we generally believe?
A reference explanation is that only those who can make the world irreversible changes are considered heroes.
simplicity, it is because of its existence that some of the changes in the world's process have changed. Without him, it might not have happened.
From this point of view, although Napoleon mentioned above was personally failed, the things he did during his lifetime made the future world completely different from before. Only such a person is considered a hero.
The same example, Yue Fei's anti-Jin career in was considered a failure, but he allowed people to see the will to resist foreign races and patriotism, of course he is a hero.
Thank you for your attention, I hope it will inspire you!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-