Text | Educate without educating (teaching without educating is called skill, teaching without educating is called way! Talk about the education around you and share the way of educating people) A student carries the hope of a family. Behind dozens of students in a class, how man

Article | Teaching and educating (Teaching without educating is called skill, teaching and educating is called Tao! Talk about education around you and share the way of educating people)

A student carries the hope of a family. Behind dozens of students in a class, how many hopes and expectations are there? Teachers work hard, teach and educate, and earn a salary of several thousand yuan a month. Teachers who work as monks and work as clockwork all day long still earn a salary of several thousand yuan a month. Perhaps it is because of this that everyone says that teachers' work is a "conscience job."

Can the "conscience" of teachers be quantitatively assessed?

cannot!

However, schools at all levels are using strict and single "quantitative assessment" to rank and score the work of teachers. Teachers' "quantitative assessment" system exists widely. Is it reasonable to exist? The strict "quantitative assessment" system is causing teachers to lose their way. Perhaps this is the biggest tragedy in today's education.

The best way to destroy a teacher is to conduct strict "quantitative assessment" on him!

The work of teachers is definitely not repeated day by day or year by year, and our schools are definitely not producing products with uniform standards. What teachers carry out is the education of love. It is one cloud pushing another cloud, one tree shaking another tree, and one heart awakening another heart.

Although the educational work is very tedious, which teacher is not full of ambition when he first takes the podium?Determined to be a good teacher, to be moved by love and awakened by heart. Why, after a few years of working, have the eyes lost color and forgotten their educational ideals?

The key reason for all this is the "quantitative assessment" of everything.

A certain school clocks in five times a day, before 7 a.m., five minutes before and after 10 a.m., at 11 noon, at 1:30 p.m., and at 5:30 p.m. During these five time periods, the area near the clock-in machine is simply a sight, and many students watched curiously during the first period.

I really don’t know what school leaders are afraid of? Is it really necessary for teachers to keep checking in? You must appear on time at a fixed time and at a fixed place. Are teachers machines?

lesson plans must be handwritten. Each lesson plan must not be less than 5 pages. You must attend three lessons per week... There are too many similar rules in schools. Is this really a good thing? Isn’t it okay to write the content in the textbook when preparing lessons? Do I have to copy the contents of the teaching reference book into the lesson plan book? Is it not okay to print out ready-made lesson plans online after modification? Does the huge time consumption really make sense?

Behind the mechanical and cold system, there is no humanistic care. It seems that everyone is the same and it is fair and reasonable. In fact, it is the collective laziness of the school leaders.

"Quantitative assessment" is very important to teachers, and no one dares to ignore it, because the assessment results determine how much performance salary you get, whether you can be rated as excellent, and whether you can be promoted to a professional title! When teachers are unable to resist the threat of reality, they can only hide in the nooks and crannies of their thoughts.

For teachers, the most important part of "quantitative assessment" is actually teaching performance. What is teaching performance? Isn’t it just the students’ test scores? When schools and parents evaluate a teacher, teaching performance is the first priority. Isn’t this evaluation method that only looks at the results but not the process the fundamental reason for the intensification of exam-oriented education?

How many teachers’ job is only to teach, but they forget to educate people! Is it because they don’t want to educate people?

A "conscience" industry that is supposed to be characterized by ideological leadership and emotional exchange experience has been reduced to manual labor without personality, dignity, or academic leadership value. How can there be time and thought to educate people? Why are class teachers in so many schools forced to do this? Because it is extremely strenuous physical work first of all!

Strict and single "quantitative assessment" not only abolishes teachers, but also makes teachers lose their way and makes education go astray.

"Conscience" cannot be quantified! Giving teachers space and allowing education to return to its original intention is what education should be like.

How many class hours and performance rankings may seem fair, but it has led to a wrong direction, which can only make exam-oriented education more intense and ignore what education should really be like.

Our current education attaches too much importance to external things. School leaders only know how to look at the enrollment rate, only know what activities teachers organize, only know how to ask for photos and leave traces, and only know how to look at things that can be put on the table... However, the core of education - the "educating" function cannot be quantified and cannot be reflected with specific data.

Schools are not factories that produce products with uniform specifications. children are not products on the assembly line, and teachers are not workers beside the assembly line. We absolutely cannot "quantify" the work of teachers in the same way as assessing workers.

In the face of every unique student, as long as the teacher has a good general direction and does not violate the principles, he should give the teacher time and space to calm down his heart, slow down his work, and let education return to the essence of "moistening things quietly" and educating people.

written at the end

"Quantitative assessment" is causing teachers to lose their way and education to lose its original intention. Let’s calm down and think about it, are we going too fast? Maybe we need to slow down, let education slow down, let teachers calm down, wouldn't it be better to let education return to the essence of "educating people"?

I am taught by . Thank you for reading, and thank you for forwarding, following, commenting, collecting, and liking .