People often see calls for "systematic safety education". So what exactly is "systematic security education"? This question may not be a simple question. Is undergraduate education a systematic safety education?

often sees people calling for "systematic security education". So what exactly is "systematic security education"? The question of

may not be a simple question. Is undergraduate education a systematic safety education? At present, more than 160 undergraduate safety majors are organized in universities in my country. Except for a very small number, they are derived from industry engineering education, such as oil production or mining engineering, mechanical engineering, measurement and control technology, construction engineering, quality engineering, etc. The safety major derived is called security engineering . Due to different sources, the safety engineering education plans of each school are different, and each has strong industry engineering characteristics. However, the market and safety issues that need to be solved are the same. For example, although there are schools where one or two safety majors are located are closely related to the nuclear power industry, they are not specialized in nuclear power. However, nuclear power companies are developing very fast, with a large number of safety and high attention to safety. They need a large number of safety professionals, that is, graduates from other safety majors need to supplement them. So for nuclear power companies, are graduates of safety majors from various industries and schools considered to have received "systematic safety education"?

Yesterday I read a document about Ghana's mining safety. It said that the solution to security problems has always relied on engineering technology in the past, but the results are not good. Now it has begun to change to human-cause and systematic scientific methods. This is really a good trend. It seems that security solutions have developed to be universal in various industries, so that it is possible to systematically be systematic. Otherwise, each industry will do its own and then use its own methods to solve problems in other industries. Then I don't think it is called a systematic solution related to systematic security education. You can think about it, as a responsible major country, do we need to change? Have you started to change?

I came to another thing yesterday. To put it simply, the next five-year plan is, which one is more worthy of research on coal mine safety, chemical safety, construction safety, etc.? Is this absurd question? However, you are asked to answer solemnly. Everyone's answers will determine what the country's focus on investing in the next stage. How do you answer? The palms and hands are all flesh, so what is the safety of that industry? Hold down the gourd and get the gourd. Security education and security strategies are not systematic or generalized, obviously you cannot balance this issue.

What I mean by systematization is scientificization, forming a common theoretical foundation, starting from concepts, gradually to basic theory, and then to practical application. To be clear, large security and systematic general security education are systematic security education!