With the trials of " teacher exit mechanism " in various places, it is inevitable that this mechanism will be available across the country. In fact, I also have other views on this mechanism. Of course, breaking the iron rice bowl of teachers will inevitably arouse the vigilance of most teachers, and teaching will inevitably become more rigorous.
However, this also shows that "survival of the fittest" has also entered the teaching profession, making teachers feel like they are facing a formidable enemy. But does it really help the development of education? It still depends on the time.
1.
The "teacher exit mechanism" should focus on the inspection of teachers' ethics, not "student evaluation". For teachers, teachers' ethics can influence students, and teachers' prestige can educate students. In today's schools, there is a very strange phenomenon, that is, teachers require students, that is, students or parents to have the ability to evaluate and influence teachers. You said that this is the progress of the times and a reflection of educational fairness. I agree. But, is this really beneficial to teachers’ teaching? What the
"teacher exit mechanism" wants to eliminate are "dressed beasts" and teachers without morals, as well as teachers who do not "teach seriously and responsibly". If teachers are taken away by parents and students in assessments just because of their personality and teaching, it is really not conducive to the development and progress of education.
The assessment should also have key points, and the key points are teacher ethics and style. Therefore, what we should have is a teacher who truly has "three correct views, faith, and willingness to endure hardship."
2.
The dignity of the teacher should be maintained and cannot be lost. I admire the severity of ancient private school teachers. After all, there is a certain truth in the saying that "filial sons emerge from under the stick". Some students will not know their faults unless they are beaten. The main reason is that today's parents dote on their children, so children "do not distinguish between right and wrong." As soon as the news about a teacher's corporal punishment comes out, the teacher will definitely lose his job. Which teacher is willing to take the "risk" to educate?
Society's tolerance has become lower. Students who were bullied because of their grades have grown up. They believe that the white eyes they once received should not be repeated to their children, so they cannot tolerate "sand" in their eyes. However, who knows that "vulnerable children", even if they do not collapse in school, will collapse in society, and even commit suicide and hurt others, although that is a story later.
My previous teachers all punished me corporally, but I never complained, even if I now face the teacher who punished me corporally again. The teacher punished me corporally because I showed my exam to other students. Now that I think about it, I feel ashamed. However, that teacher was right, and I think the same way now.
The "teacher withdrawal mechanism" does work, but teachers should be given more rights. After all, teaching and educating people is a "great undertaking".
