formulates a school management system, and it must be moderate and more warm
Wangying (special commentator)
Some time ago, it was revealed that a student in a middle school in Dali, Yunnan was given a warning by the school for going to the toilet during lunch break, which caused controversy. On the afternoon of November 20, the middle school published a statement on its official WeChat account saying that the student affected the rest of his classmates during the lunch break, and the school grade department gave him a warning and would not be recorded in the student's file.
According to the normal theory, if a school wants to ensure normal educational and teaching order, it must formulate and implement strict rules and regulations. Some students who violate the system will be punished accordingly. Only by regulating one's own behavior under the constraints of the system can students protect the interests of all students and gradually cultivate students' awareness of rules. This middle school has formulated a system for lunch breaks in the school. The student was punished for violating this regulation and should not have become the focus of public attention. Why does such an ordinary thing cause such a great controversy?
I think the problem is not whether the school should punish the student, but that the system formulated by the school itself has problems. The correct system is not excessive no matter how it is implemented, but if it is a wrong system, compulsory execution will attract criticism from everyone. So, how to ensure that the management system formulated by the school is correct? Specifically, it is necessary to achieve six words - is reasonable, reasonable and legal.
first of all, means that when formulating management systems, schools should reflect the people-oriented concept, comprehensively consider the various needs of students, and treat general and special situations differently. Judging from the online reaction to this matter, the opposition is mostly focused on "Going to the toilet is a human physiological need, and students cannot be punished for such reasons." It is believed that such a management system is non-humanized and should be abandoned.
reported that the school’s high school students’ schedule is “classes are closed at 12:10 noon, lunch break at 13:00, and afternoon classes at 14:30.” The school probably believes that from the time when get out of class is over at noon to lunch break, students should have enough time to go to the toilet. After the lunch break begins, if they go to the toilet again, it is a violation of discipline. It should be said that this regulation is not difficult for most students to achieve, but if some students drink too much water at noon or have "digestion", will they be solved quietly in the dormitory? Wouldn't it affect other students' rest? It can be seen that this system does not conform to students' reality.
is secondly reasonable, that is, the formulation of the system must conform to common sense , and cannot be plausible, but must stand the test of time and other people's consideration. According to reports, during the lunch break period, the school requires students not to have any behavior that affects other students' rest during the lunch break, and to walk gently when going to the toilet, and not make loud noises. It is also required that the dormitory management teacher should stop it in time when he hears the sound that affects the students' rest, record the students who disobey the stop and report it to the grade department for education and handling of the students.
The reason why this student was punished was that "he affected the rest of the students around him when going to the toilet." We can't help but ask: How did the student affect the rest of the students around him? Are you deliberately shouting and making noises to wake up the classmates around you? Or walk around softly and accidentally make a little noise? If it is the former situation, it is not unfair to be punished by the student; if it is the latter situation, as long as it is a person, a sound will be made during activities. Is this small voice punished?
is again legal, that is, all rules and regulations formulated by schools must comply with educational laws and regulations, and comply with the relevant policies and regulations of the education department. Specifically, the system for formulating a system with the daily behavior of Guanzhong students should be based on the " Middle School Student Code " and " Middle School Student Daily Behavior Code ". It can be refined and concreteized based on the actual situation of various places and schools, but it cannot be exceeded, and the requirements cannot be taken for granted and raised at will.Students were given a "warning" for "going to the toilet". I don't think such a severe penalty clause can be found in any education laws or departmental regulations.
Being reasonable, reasonable and legal are not only the principles that schools should adhere to when formulating management systems, but they are also the "degrees" that schools should grasp when implementing the system. Schools are neither factories nor law enforcement agencies. The students they manage are living people who are growing and developing. The formulation and implementation of any management system should not be a cold dogma. The ultimate goal of promoting human development must be taken into consideration, and the individual needs of students should be respected. It must be both moderate and warm, and ultimately achieve the purpose of motivating students to educate themselves and improve themselves.
