Students and parents are no longer unfamiliar with textbook revisions. In order to adapt to the development of the times, the textbooks used by students will be revised every once in a while, and the contents in them will be deleted or modified. In short, the textbook versions used by students from different eras may be different.
may have had a very high trust in the education department in the past and did not care much about the issues of the textbooks. However, after experiencing the "toxic illustration" incident of the People's Education Press mathematics, parents became very sensitive and attached great importance to the content of the textbooks. Especially parents who often provide homework can always find something that subverts their cognition.
For example, the storm of "This person is human" that has caused a lot of controversy before, many people began to doubt the knowledge they have learned. They clearly learned "This person", but were told that this version had never been available. Just as people were still immersed in the so-called " Mandela effect ", some parents discovered that there was a deviation in the Chinese textbook and their memory , and once again pushed the problem of revision of the Chinese textbook to the forefront.
Hoeing the seeds becomes a "merciful farmer", and a person becomes a "human". Is it really a deviation in memory?
People always say that after graduation, they will return the knowledge to the teacher, , but for those familiar ancient Chinese, I believe that many people have formed muscle memory , which can be memorized simply by starting a single head, and , especially those famous quotes and aphorisms, can be read as soon as they open their mouths.
I remember when I was reciting "Born in distress, die in happiness" when I was a child, remembered the sentence "Therefore, God will give great responsibilities to this man", but now I am told that it has always been "human" . People who don't believe it look back and find that this is indeed the case. Some people begin to wonder if it is really a memory deviation? Discussion on
is still continuing, and some parents in discovered that the "hoe" they recited before has now been called "mercy farmers". Is it caused by the so-called "Mandela effect"? After all, this ancient poem is the first batch of students to learn, and almost everyone can do it.
Some parents were a little surprised when they first heard their children recite "Praise for Farmers", and they still felt that their children had memorized the wrong name. , but after seeing the textbook, they could only sigh helplessly, "It seems that they can't tutor in Chinese in the future."
But is it really because people’s memory is deviated? In fact, the version of Siren does exist, and many people have found the corresponding textbooks, but it is just some local versions of , and the People's Education Press has not used the word "Shenren".
and "hoeing" becomes "compassionate to farmers" is actually easy to understand. In the ancient poems passed down, there are two poems for compassion farmers. In order to facilitate students' distinction, it is changed to "hoeing" . Now it emphasizes respect for the original author. , the education department changed it back to "compassionate to farmers" after the discussion, and then used "one" and "second" to distinguish . So in the final analysis, it is the difference in the textbook version, which caused these "misunderstandings". There are many practical reasons behind the different versions of
. Parents should not be too confused by
. Many people think that the version of the textbook has changed . Wouldn’t it cause trouble for parents to tutor homework? Can't the previous version of be used? actually has many realistic reasons behind this.
used to be restricted by the background of the times and educational resources. Many textbooks for are not very rigorous. Now educational resources are gradually enriched, and the overall quality of students has been improved. The textbooks must naturally keep pace with the times. For some content that students cannot understand or are out of touch with the times, they must change, so that students can get better education.
Of course, parents will definitely not understand it, but they don’t need to worry too much about . Many knowledge is not generalized, and parents should also be able to seek common ground while reserving differences. Don’t be too sensitive. After all, different times will change, and students’ needs will also change. cannot always use old ideas to deal with problems.
However, when the textbook is revised, cannot only focus on innovation. Those classic and good works should still be retained. In particular, they cannot be deleted and modified for some absurd reasons.
textbook version is updated. How should parents tutor so that they can avoid bringing wrong children?
Although Chinese textbooks have reached a unified version, , there will be local differences in other textbooks , and there will inevitably be subtle differences in knowledge points. When parents face these differences, must adhere to a principle, that is, everything is based on the books students have learned.
When you find that the knowledge your child learns is different from your own, parents should not just act on their own. You can to read the book. If necessary, you can contact the teacher and ask for the correct knowledge points . After you get the exact answer, you should teach your child. Never be "stubborn".
In addition, parents should know that the current knowledge points are very different from before. Before leading their children to preview and study, parents should first learn simply because the first impression is very important. If parents teach wrongly, changing it will take more time and energy to change . Therefore, the knowledge learned in the first time must be rigorous and correct.
[Author’s message] The knowledge learned by students in each era will not be much different overall, but there will still be differences in many details. , especially in areas where different versions are used, there is a clear gap. Parents should also view these differences reasonably and do not be too entangled. respects the textbook and the teacher’s explanation . If you have different opinions, you can put forward them to discuss together, but teaching children is still based on textbooks to avoid confusion to students.
Topic: Which version of the textbook did you learn when you were a child? Welcome to leave a message to share and discuss.
(The picture is from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it)
