The first two articles describe the concept, characteristics and content requirements of literature reviews, and the format and writing of literature reviews.
Today continue to share the writing steps of the literature review.
1, selected topic
Selected topic plays an important role in writing the review. topic selection first requires content novel . Only novel content can extract questions that are as attractive as magnets.
topics should also choose topics that have made progress in recent years, are suitable for my country's national conditions, and are also concerned by scientific and technological personnel in this professional world, such as a comprehensive evaluation of a new foreign technology to explore its practicality in my country.
There are usually several types of topics: one is a topic that is closely related to the major the author is engaged in, and the author has practical work experience and has a relatively sufficient say in this; the other is a topic that the topic is not much related to the author's major, and the author has mastered a certain amount of materials and is willing to explore.
2. View and accumulate relevant literature
For beginners, finding literature often doesn't know where to start. can generally first collect authoritative reference books, such as monographs, textbooks, academic collections, etc. . The textbook narrative is relatively comprehensive, and the views proposed are recognized by most people; monographs focus on discussing the current development status, related issues and prospects of a certain topic; academic collections can reflect the progress and achievements of a certain period of time and help authors grasp the research trends in the contemporary field; secondly, search for journals and literature materials, with journal documents as vast as the sea and scattered.
3. Methods to find literature
. One is to find recent (or from near to far) journal with relatively complete content based on the topic you selected, and then collect the original information according to the references at the end of the document. In this way, the "snowball"-style search method can collect a large amount of documents you need.
Another scientific method that is time-saving and labor-saving is to search literature by searching reference books. commonly used search reference books include abstracts and index journals. It is the golden key to check domestic and foreign literature. By mastering this golden key, you can quickly find the required documents.
4. Processing
must process the read materials, which is a necessary preparation process for writing a review. , in accordance with the theme requirements of the review, sorted and arranged the abstract cards or notes written, so that they are serialized and organized, and strive to make the arguments clear and accurate basis, and the explanations are clear and logical.
The data outline is sorted according to the classification, and then scientifically analyze it. finally combines your own practical experience and write down your own views and experiences, so that subjective information is incorporated into the objective information.
5. Writing into essay
Before writing into essay, you should first draw an outline, decide what to write first, what to write later, what should be explained, what should be integrated into your own point of view, and what can be omitted or mentioned a few strokes. key explanation should be appropriately divided into several sub-titles.
6. After the outline is drawn up, you can write a writing
According to the initial article framework, explain it one by one. You should pay attention to thorough reasoning in writing, both arguments and arguments. You must master the key points when writing, and pay attention to reflecting the author's views and tendencies. , but the opposite views should also be briefly listed.
For certain reasoning or hypothesis, you should consider the degree to which the experts can accept, and you can put forward your own opinions, or raise them as questions to discuss them, and then explain the existing problems and prospects. After the first draft of is formed, it is repeatedly modified and processed according to the conventional draft revision method.
Literature data is the basis of the review, and looking up literature is a key step in writing a review. You should pay attention to the timeliness of the collection of literature, and it must be new content in the past one or two years. Information from four or five years ago should generally not be included too much. The content of review should not be comprehensive and become a browsing review. The more concentrated, clearer and more specific the content of the review is, the better.
7. There are many review papers, but the comprehensive
The summary covers a large amount of information, which makes readers not spend much time but can get more information. Many famous domestic and foreign journals have review columns, and provide a larger amount of text and a larger amount of references. The academic level and writing requirements of the review paper are relatively high, and only senior authors can write a review paper that meets the requirements.
8. Review the rules of papers
The review procedures of review papers follow the general review rules, but in terms of choices for a review, they still have their own speciality and regularity. Selected in balanced comparison. The materials of the review paper are derived from literature, and multiple authors can submit articles to the editorial department within a time period on the same issue. Therefore, the editorial department must weigh, compare and analyze similar manuscripts to decide on the choice. For example, "Stein Cell Research" is a current research hotspot. This journal received 3 articles in the same time period. After analysis and comparison, it is believed that they are reviews conducted from different aspects and have their own characteristics, so they are decided to be published in the same journal.
9. Evaluation of manuscripts
Evaluation of manuscripts for recruitment: is an international research hotspot and has good guidance and reference significance;
is a major topic in this field, rich in content and worth publishing;
has few domestic research, which has a driving effect on carrying out this work;
introduces the design ideas and current trends, which is inspiring to readers;
reviews the current overview, and readers will learn from it;
is a cutting-edge progress data and has a high academic reference value;
0 content is progressive and has the author's own work, which is worth introducing;
0 issue is innovative and controversial, and this article provides certain ideas.
Evaluation of rejected manuscripts: involves too narrow, and there are not many interested readers;
0 experimental basis is insufficient, and most of them are speculative content;
1 content is scattered, the focus is not prominent, and there is no system concept after reading;
The topic is very big, but the specific content is not much;
There have been many reports in China, without obvious characteristics;
The materials are scattered, the content is thin, and it is not clear;
is not familiar with the field reviewed and cannot write. When editing the review manuscript, the author found that all manuscripts that meet the recruitment requirements must be retired and edited before they can be published without exception. Of course, the editorial department is very cautious about the retrieval of manuscripts. Generally speaking, the retrieval of manuscripts is the manuscript that is ready to be published.
I am the 4 academic tycoons of Emperor html. I will continue to share the postgraduate entrance examination practical information, scientific research knowledge and paper writing skills, etc. Everyone is welcome to focus! ! !
