Nikon WX 10x50 IF review


Nikon WX 10x50 IF

Introduction In particular, the photography circle is still looking forward to what new products Nikon can launch, but Nikon has not actually done so. On the contrary, in order to inherit the tradition (in fact, Nikon is more closely related to sports optics, rather than photography), Nikon released two Super Bull X telescopes. It is not an exaggeration to say that Super Bull X is because these two mirrors show Nikon's power. Strength. If you don't consider cost and size, God knows what Nikon can do.

Nikon has considered the new telescope for a long time. The picture shows the 2010 prototype

. What is the result? Nikon has brought WX 7x50 and WX 10x50 two telescopes. From the point of view of the parameters, the most common place of the two mirrors is the name. In terms of field of view, the two mirrors are 10.7 degrees and 9 degrees respectively, which is also the best part of these two mirrors. In order to compare how wide the field of view is, you need to know that the widest 7x50 and 10x50 are only 7.5 degrees and 6.5 degrees. In addition, Nikon also ensures that under such a huge field of view, the edges must be corrected well, and the exit pupil distance must be comfortable enough.

So there are no shortcomings in these two models? I have already said, volume/weight/cost. The final mass-produced product of these two mirrors weighs 2.5 kg and the length is 30 cm. The price is even higher, reaching 4W. It’s even more expensive if you choose the Centennial Edition.

The left side is the prototype of the mass production version,On the right is the 2015 version of the prototype.

design

It would be great to evaluate such a mirror, but I think it is necessary to introduce the optical design of this mirror.

Modern telescope objectives are basically universal, and slightly better grades may use two-piece gap-separated ED (low dispersion glass). Nikon's design is one step closer, using three pieces, one of which is ED glass.

Side profile view of Nikon WX

From the above figure, you can basically see the lens layout of Nikon WX. If you look closely, you might think that objective lens does not have only two elements? In fact, the first piece may be double-adhesive, and then you can see Abbe prism, Abbe prism is a total reflection prism, this configuration can ensure the brightness of the picture, the contrast (contrast) is good enough.

Behind the prism you can see two plan lenses, which are mainly responsible for compensating the curvature of the field of view from the center to the edge of the picture. On the back is a huge eyepiece group, which looks like 6 pieces, with a 2-1-1-2 layout. The manufacturer claims that there are 3 ED lenses in the lens barrel, so in addition to the objective lens, the eyepiece group and the flat field lens may also have ED lens .

Abbe prism

However, what I said is only a personal guess, because from the cross-sectional view, Nikon did not say whether it is 7x50 or 10x50. Can you think that the two telescopes use the same objective lens and prism, followed by a flat field lens and a more complex eyepiece?

Abbe prism and primary mirror comparison

Since it is born for performance,Without compromise, the objective lens coating is also the best. Nikon claims that all air surfaces use the best multilayer coating, and the prisms also have phase coatings.

If it is used for stargazing, can such a complicated optical structure guarantee the light transmittance of ? Obviously this mirror has so many air surfaces, roughly 20? Even with the best coating, each film will lose 0.2%-0.3% (visible light) when direct light comes in. Let us assume that a loss of 0.25%, then 20 is 5%. However, it is also necessary to consider the decrease in coating efficiency, especially far away from the visible spectrum region, because mirrors are optimized for visible light bands, and there are some large angles of incident light. Ultra-wide-angle eyepieces have some extremely large angles. Take these into account. Going in, it's not surprising that you lose 10%.

Nikon WX Centennial Edition

This is not over yet, if it is a simple mirror, we just say that the coating is OK, and the light absorption problem can be ignored. It is reasonable to say that, because modern mirrors are optically clean, and the light path is very short as a small mirror, so the problem of light absorption is secondary compared to coating. But as Nikon WX has such a long light path and so much glass, this aspect still needs to be considered.

Nikon WX regular version

We don’t know what glass Nikon uses, but we can imagine that Nikon must use the best glass, just like some top mirrors use Schott HT glass. . SCHOTT’s top glass 400 nm absorbs 0.2% in one centimeter of optical path. The bigger problem is the prism, because you have to use Bak4, even if you use SCHOTT HT, it will lose 0.7%. Of course, you can also use SK glass, the absorption rate is reduced to 0.4%.

We can guess the light path of WX through the cross-sectional view. Using the pixel marking method, we can probably get that the light path of WX is 13 cm long.Half of them are in the prism. In general, you have to add 6-7% blue light loss. The light loss in the middle and red parts of the visible spectrum is much smaller.

Nikon WX eyepiece close-up

The lens body is made of magnesium alloy, and the part that is held by hand is covered with a layer of leather. The eyepiece has 6 positions, and the end of eyepiece is rubber. Material. In addition to these, nitrogen is flushed in the mirror body, which is waterproof up to 5 meters (10 minutes).

Buyers can get a good aluminum alloy case, leather objective/eyepiece cover, a tripod adapter and two straps (one for the mirror and the other for the case). The mirror itself comes with a 10-year warranty.

WX Nikon accessories

measured

objective lens diameter measured: -50 mm left and right -50 mm actual multiples

: 9.97 times

transmittance: 85%

color: The center is excellent,The edge of the middle level

divergence: negligible tip star point

distortion : from the field of view radius

coma: is actually not visible, even at the very edge, the pinpoint star point _emu13usp2 pem_span11 strong8 span 10 Blurred edges: is very sharp, all the way to the extreme edge

The edge of the field of view is dark: _u11sem strong strong em9 _strong_1015 : slightly yellowish green,Referring to FIG transmittance axis

: perfect

internal reflective:

extremely well, white exit pupil Relative to the black background

Mirror body mirror cavity: is very large and heavy. It is made of metal and may be the largest 10x50 specification on the market. The exterior is covered with leather ornaments and feels good. Be careful with the 6th gear, with rubber on the top. Because the field of view is so large, the eye mask needs to be pulled back to see the full field of view, or only one gear. Made in Japan

focusing: independent focusing, huge eyepiece. There are two textured rings on the eyepiece for focusing, the rotation is relatively smooth, and the damping is acceptable. The diopter adjustment is ±5, but it is far more than that. Some look very strong Wagyu

on the shelf: has a central axis that can be connected to _span8 strong8span _strong_span11 _span0

57 mm -79 mm

recent focus: 8.2 yards apparent View

: The apparent field of view is simply converted to 89.1 degrees (simple conversion),The tangent formula is converted to 75.9 degrees

Real field of view: measured as 8.94 degrees, which is slightly smaller than the official claim. Internal extinction of : is made very black, there is no grating inside, but there is a partition between the prism. There is also blackening around the prism, but there are gray particles on the prism.

vignetting (trimming):

left and right 0.24% 0.0%

Prism: Bak4 high quality prism

Anti-reflection coating: The objective lens is yellow-green, the prism is blue, and the eyepiece is yellow-green and blue.Low intensity of the outgoing

warranty: 10 years

score : 84.6%

advantage

  • strong and waterproof
  • _lipan_li519
  • Astigmatism can be ignored
  • Excellent center of field of view chromatic aberration correction
  • No loss of light at the edge of the field of view
  • li516span li11span _li11span _li11span _li11span _li11spanThe inside of the lens barrel is clean
  • high-quality Bak4 prism
  • rich in accessories

span li li 516 li 516 li 516 li strong span li 516 _span strong _span _span _ ul 516 li 516 li 5 price is too high (domestic 4w selling price)

Summary

I used too much space to introduce the theoretical data, and then talk about the actual light transmittance and light loss. , The following is Nikon's light transmittance chart.

Nikon WX 10x50 IF Transmittance

According to the above figure, we can confirm that our above judgment is correct. The transmittance is up to 90%, which is the red part. This part of light absorption can be ignored . These light losses are mainly caused by the glass air surface. The central part of visible light is roughly 85%, while the blue part is less than 80%. The large prism of Nikon WX is responsible for the remaining light loss. Since the light absorption is selectively bluish, the color of this mirror is not perfect, and the color is greenish and yellow. Of course, this is not to blame Nikon, the current level of glass is just like this, the complex optical path will inevitably have more light loss.

I mentioned some shortcomings found after testing.I will add two more items. Despite Nikon's guarantee, I still don't believe that such a wide eyepiece can correct the distortion perfectly. According to the actual test, we are right, or at least, Nikon did not do better. The result is not necessarily so bad, it belongs to the middle level, but you can see obvious distortion on the screen.

Normal 50 Paul compared with Nikon 10x50, especially the eyepiece part

The second problem is the huge field of view. I am not sure whether Nikon can do better or other ways. Nikon claims that the eye mask has six card positions, but in fact, if you want to see the full field of view, you can only choose not to pull the eye mask or only pull one gear. The other four card positions can be said to be useless. In addition, if you want to see happily, you have to cover a little eye mask with your hands, because such a large field of view is difficult to avoid the appearance of side lights, which may affect your observation mood.

Of course, there are not so many mirrors worthy of criticism. Just like distortion, I don't believe that the edge sharpness of the field of view can be corrected more perfectly. However, I think what I said about distortion is right, but the edge sharpness is wrong. Nikon has proven many times that they are very professional on flat courts, and this is also the case, and it also retains the normal exit pupil distance. The field of view is really huge, and it is almost perfectly sharp to the side, without any coma or loss of light. The visual effects must be amazing. I don't even believe that such a mirror can be made. I believe that other manufacturers cannot release a similar mirror.

In 2013, Zeiss launched an Otus lens, the purpose is to show the strength, as if to say "If you don't consider cost and three-dimensionality, see what we can make." The Nikon WX is like doing the same thing in the lens circle. It not only reflects the strength but also boosts morale, because the sports optics circle is much smaller than the photography circle, and of course it also contributes to Nikon's century.

My suggestion is that if Nikon really has the courage to produce a 7.5-8 degree 10x50, the field of view should be corrected perfectly, and the performance should surpass any opponent in the same level.Of course, the more important thing is to make the mirror smaller, lighter, and cheaper. Everyone can accept it more happily. Finally, I would like to congratulate Nikon on the addition of such a mirror WX, which opened everyone's eyes.

.