Model 1: Volkswagen Passat
The results of the first Passat test are very clear to everyone, and the results are not good, especially in the frontal 25% offset collision, the A-pillar also bends. After the enhancement, Passat took the initiative to apply for a retest, and this time the result also saved his "face". Although it is an active application for testing, Passat’s test vehicles are still randomly selected on the market by China Insurance Research Institute, not the test vehicles sent by the manufacturer. Consumers can still rest assured.
In this test, Passat won 7 G and an A. It can be said that this result is very good. Even the Asian dragon, which has received high scores before, has only P for collision and maintenance economy. Passat is A. Whether it is the safety of the entire vehicle or the economics of maintenance after a collision, the Passat has performed well enough that it can be said to be "shen" again. Combined with its market enthusiasm, Passat's sales may usher in a small explosion, and it is expected to win the top position again.
Model 2: Lynk & Co 03
, as the first sedan under Geely's CMA framework, has high expectations for Lynk & Co 03, and its high-performance version, Lynk & Co 03+, is also known as the independent "GTI". In this crash test, Lynk&Co 03 also achieved 7 G and 1 M scores. Its crashworthiness and maintenance economy are M, which belongs to the mainstream level, and the safety-related test has its scores. All are excellent and their performance is very eye-catching. In the 25% offset collision of
, although the A-pillar of the Lynk & Co 03 also bends to a certain extent, its intrusion space is small and the safety of the occupants is guaranteed, so it has an excellent rating. In the past, everyone had a certain prejudice against domestic cars, but many domestic cars performed really well in the crash test of China Insurance Research Institute. It is time for everyone to change their understanding of domestic cars.
Model 3: Honda Haoying
Honda Haoying’s crash test video has also been released before. This time is a summary of all evaluation items. It has scored 5 Gs, 2 As, and 1 P. In fact, this is what everyone expected. Its 25% offset collision performance is not good. It only gets an A rating, and the side collision score is also A. It can be seen that its body strength performance is not good enough. Since the top pressure and seat/headrest performance are G, the overall rating for the protection of the occupants in the car is still G. In the assisted driving part of
, Haoying performed well, and it received a G rating. Moreover, Haoying is also a model with a higher rate of active safety systems under Honda. At present, Haoying’s terminal sales performance is also very good. But in any case, its overall safety performance is not good, and its poor performance in crashworthiness and maintenance economy is understandable, but its body strength does need to be improved.
Model 4: Haval H6 (second generation)
Although the Haval H6 has been updated to the third generation, the second-generation models are still on sale, and the second-generation Haval H6 has a huge inventory, so the results of the Haval H6 this time Still has reference significance. In this test, Haval H6 received 4 Gs, 2 As, and 1 P. Although Haval H6 received an A rating in the top pressure test, its 25% biased collision rating reached G.
The disadvantage of the second-generation Haval H6 is that none of the series is equipped with an auxiliary safety system, which also results in an overall evaluation of A for the safety of its occupants. If it has an active safety system, its performance should surpass Haoying. The second-generation Haval H6 has won the domestic sales champion for many years. Until now, it still has good sales. Manufacturers should really consider installing the Haval H6 with an active safety system in the future.
Model 5: Mazda Artez
In the test of China Insurance Research Institute, many Japanese cars have achieved good results, but Artez is an exception. In this crash test, Artez’s performance was surprising . Atez received 5 Gs, 1 A, and 2 M results. In a 25% offset collision, its A-pillar was significantly bent. Only M was rated, and its performance was not as good as Hao Ying, which is also today 5. The only M-rated model among the models.
is due to its performance in a 25% offset collision, and the overall safety evaluation of the occupant in the Atez car is only A. Some netizens even found the 25% biased crash test chart of the American version of Atez, and its A did not deform significantly. In fact, Artez is not doing well in China, because of the abnormal noise, it frequently appears on the complaint list, and its sales have been tepid. The performance in the test of China Insurance Research Institute may also hit Atez again.
Summary: Although China Insurance Research Institute has also experienced turmoil, it still has a certain degree of credibility due to its third-party role and its own evaluation standards. The above five cars are all hot models on the market, and some models are even controversial, and this crash test is believed to exceed the imagination of some consumers. But in any case, the collision performance can also represent the safety of the car to a certain extent, and you can use it as a reference when choosing a car.
