Recently, China Insurance Research Institute C-IASI announced the collision results of a batch of new cars. The test results show that the safety of the M7 in the three dimensions of in-car occupants, laymen and auxiliary safety meets the excellent standards of China Insurance Research Institute.
We can see that after the collision test, although the A column was a bit uneven and had a certain degree of deformation, China Insurance Research Institute gave Good the evaluation in the 25% bias collision on the front of the driver's side; similarly, Elantra and Shadow Leopard both experienced varying degrees of deformation during the test, and the final result was all Good.
As we all know, soft-top convertible sports car will strengthen the strength of the anti-collision beam and A-pillar upright plate, and then disperse energy through the high-strength steel skeleton on the side and bottom of the car to achieve the protection of the cockpit. The A-pillar itself does not assume the responsibility of dispersing impact force, so the A-pillar cannot be the only criterion for measuring safety.
not only that, compared with passive safety such as A-pillar, active safety is also important. Nowadays, there are few detailed tests on various active safety configurations of cars, which is so unfair to the M7, which has such rich active safety configurations.
Questioning M7 uses the latest braking system of Bosch , and is equipped with sensitive AEB function. With the support of a number of L2+-level assisted driving functions, the active safety configuration is very rich. Just imagine whether a high-speed vehicle does not have a sensitive braking system. Can the A-pillar be used alone to survive a violent impact?
In addition, the current model is that the test items are fixed and different test models are replaced. In order to obtain a good test score, many car companies add materials and reinforce the test items at the collision position, but ignore the safety protection of other locations. In reality, there is really a collision, and the safety of the entire vehicle depends only on the A-pillar? How to ensure the safety of passengers in co-pilots and passengers in other locations?
In contrast, the main frame structure of the M7 passenger compartment, ultra-high strength steel and high strength steel use account for nearly 60%, with a maximum strength of up to 1500Mpa; at the same time, the whole vehicle is equipped with 8 airbags, including one main airbag, one co-pilot airbag, two front side airbags, two second-row side airbags, and two side air curtains. The co-pilot and rear passengers have taken into consideration. In addition, the M7 of Questioning World has not ignored battery safety and cooperated with the industry's top supplier CATL . The battery pack adopts an array firewall structure. It has to be said that the M7 will consider driving safety very carefully and safety protection is comprehensive.
Also, I want to say that rational thinking is important. Testing is a test after all. The real driving environment is complex and ever-changing. How can you prove that a car with high test scores can guarantee your travel safety? On the contrary, is a car with poor test scores a low safety? It can only be said that models with high collision scores can only reflect that some positions are safe enough to collide under fixed conditions, which does not mean that the overall safety performance of the vehicle is high.
Indeed, the original intention of the test is good, and it is to increase the attention of the automotive industry to drive safety and protect the personal safety of drivers and passengers. At the same time, no matter how good the product is, it can only be achieved by teaching people how to fish, and the iron must be strong himself. Even if the collision results of the test vehicle are very high, if the driver's driving behavior is not standardized, driving safety will not be guaranteed. To minimize accidents, we must fundamentally improve the concept of safe driving and achieve civilized driving.
