empty = nothing
empty = nothing to ask for
does the "empty" in the buddha tell people strong1 "strong1" 1? No
Wrong! mistaken! mistaken!
Come and listen to what the old monk Long Lian said
0 "I realized that this is not a span of Buddha" "I" is the root of troubles and karma, and sentient beings are led and controlled by this "I" all day long.
People in the world say that Buddhism has said that there is no-it is nonsense. Do you know that Buddhism looks at the problem from a fundamental point, and the views of different sects are also different.
From a certain point of view, the sect does not have a thorough view of the Madhyamaka Sect, and the teachings of the Yingcheng Sect of Madhyamaka Sect and the self-continued school are different. The "Three Theory of Xuanyi" by the Bodhisattva of the World is about Prajna principles.Three theories: "The Central Theory", " Bailun " and "The Twelve Doors Theory". The trilogy is empty theory. There are one hundred theories in "Hundred Opinions", all of which sum up the truth of the three theories.
Dharma is different from secular truth. Secular truth is the truth that people in the world think, it is a habit, and it is a common promise. The Noble Truth is the truth witnessed by the wisdom of the saints, so it is the view of "deep prajna", which means that unlike ordinary people, "deep" also means "important".
"Time": It is the time when the Bodhisattva looks at the problems of the universe with a deep eye, and when he works hard.
In the end, I talked about the word "xing", which is when looking at the problem deeper and deeper, and then came to the truth that "the five aggregates are all empty". People in the world think that emptiness means nothing. Therefore, Buddhism says "all dharmas are empty"-some people will say that Buddhism is open-eyed and nonsense; when we say "emptiness" is not "nothing", people in the world also say that monks are arguing, and what they say is not enough for a while. Say empty, and then say empty is not nothing for a while.
When the Prajna Buddhism was popular in the past, the empty theory was not clearly explained. The common people called it "mouse bird empty", like the sound of bird pecking tree "empty empty".
Prajna speaks about emptiness very thoroughly. Everyone knows that Lord Shakya is revered as the "King of emptiness". He said that renunciation is the gate of emptiness. If emptiness is not explained clearly, the Dharma is called "Duanmie". null".
can't be said in general. The next limit is what is "empty"? What is there,In addition to "no", is there any "yes"?
Simply put "empty" is to empty our attachments-as long as we are attached to everything, we believe that all things are real. This view is fundamentally wrong, because all things It's all dependent emptiness, not that things don't exist.
If a table exists, if there is a misconception that "this thing is indestructible, it is tangible"-it is called attachment.
Even the smallest attachment should be broken. If you keep one point, it is the root of life and death. The Buddha has exhausted the vajra habit, that is, has exhausted the strongest attachment of all living beings. We should find out the object of attachment.
The article is excerpted from: "Heart Sutra Simple Explanation"
.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-