Recently, the AMD Ryzen 7000 series was finally launched, but it was not well received. Instead, many netizens said that AMD has become abolished. So why is this happening? In the final analysis, AMD's products did not meet users' expectations this time, and the traditional advantages were almost lost.
Simplely compare the new products of AMD and Intel. You can find that in the mainstream R5 and i5 products, AMD R5-7600X is obviously not as good as Intel i5-13600K (F). When the price is close, the 13th-generation i5 has 8 more small cores than the other party. Therefore, in terms of multi-core performance, the 13th-generation i5 has a relatively obvious advantage, and the 13th-generation i7 is also the case.
Speaking of multi-core performance, this is AMD's traditional art, but it was turned over by the large-core heterogeneous solution of Intel . Faced with this situation, AMD emphasized in its publicity that it is a design of all-large cores, but the number of large-cores of the 13th-generation i5 and i7 has the same number of large-cores as AMD's competitors, and then there are 8 small cores, which can't break the deadlock at all.
has not taken advantage of except for performance. This time, the price of the AMD platform has also increased significantly. After looking at the price of the B650 motherboard, it is generally more than 1,000 yuan, while the B650M mortar has reached 1,699 yuan. Before, the B450 and B550 motherboards can be obtained for about 600 yuan. This time, no one should have heard someone tell the matter about the motherboard price when defending AMD.
, and Intel can also use the previous motherboard, and DDR4 memory can be selected in memory, unlike AMD, which can only choose DDR5 memory. As for the price of CPU, AMD has no advantage, and its cost-effectiveness is obviously not as good as the other party. This time, AMD lost all the special skills of cost-effectiveness, and it was sad that some netizens said that AMD was arriving.
For ordinary users, the attractiveness of the AMD Ryzen 7000 series is really limited. If you like to play games, wouldn’t it be nice to choose the previous generation to R7-5800X3D processor and then use a B550 motherboard? If it is a common purpose, just choose R5-5600 or i5-12400F, and even i3.
If you pursue high performance, the attractiveness of the AMD Ryzen 7000 series is still limited. The advantages of the 13th generation i5 and i7 against R5 and R7 are undoubtedly more obvious. Compared with the higher-end i9 and R9, although the number of large cores is a little smaller, the number of small cores of i9 has reached 16, and the total number of physical cores is 24. The ability of multi-threaded is also excellent.
Generally speaking, AMD is currently passive on the desktop platform, and it doesn’t matter if there is no advantage in performance, but there is no advantage in price. Users who pursue performance will naturally go to the 13th generation Core. Users who pursue price will choose the previous generation of AMD and Intel. The Ryzen 7000 series is sandwiched in the middle, which is extremely embarrassing.
Of course, it is easy to change this situation. Just lower the price. It is actually easy to change your faith these days. There are fans everywhere, they are all fence-bearers. As long as the price is in place, the sound of AMD YES will come back soon. However, the problem is that the OEM fee of TSMC's 5nm process is not cheap. Even if AMD wants to reduce the price, it has to finish the first wave. After all, everyone has said that AMD cannot make a starter in recent years, but there are always some people who will make a starter.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-