First of all, the Internet economy is an innovation led by private enterprises, and this development trend will not change in the future. Private enterprises have exerted service capabilities and innovative capabilities that state-owned enterprises cannot match. This has indeed quickly led to the concentration of wealth in the Internet economy. However, from the government's perspective, this "disease of wealth" is bearable, reversible, and supervised. “Too big to fail” does not entirely apply to private Internet companies. If we continue to give more policy space to private Internet companies, they will still create new service models in this field, even though their original purpose is to make money.
Secondly, it is not good for the government and state-owned enterprises to take over the development of the Internet economy. Today, of course, it is not just private enterprises that have noticed the convenience of online services. State-owned enterprises and local governments are using the Internet to expand their services or profit methods. But objectively speaking, in terms of friendliness, convenience, comfort, and satisfaction, the public’s buy-in is not good. The reason is very simple. Today's leading Internet companies are leading and global. This level of layout cannot be caught up in a short time by imitation. In fact, local governments and state-owned enterprises do not have the motivation or ambition in this regard. Being able to serve a narrow region or industry is their greatest vision. Therefore, objectively speaking, the future development of the Internet economy can only rely on private enterprises.
But this does not mean that the Internet economy is without problems. When some private enterprises have grown to the point where they are as wealthy as small countries, they have also begun to become rigid, and various problems such as bureaucracy, corruption, extravagance, arrogance, and arrogance have also begun to appear. The Internet economy is not equal to the economy itself. Its expanding influence does not mean that it can replace all economic models. It does not matter if the Internet private enterprises that have become large do not realize this. As long as the government allows full competition and does not allow these large enterprises to enjoy domestic and international privileges and does not provide them with preferential treatment, they will soon be abandoned by consumers and will soon be swept away by the big waves of the market.
It should be noted that large-scale Internet private enterprises are completely different from my country's early national capital enterprises. They have no historical mission of saving the country and the people, and have no historical responsibility for the rise and fall of the world. Of course, the country and society have never required them to have such a responsibility. Now we need to give them equal protection, but we cannot rashly label them as national enterprises, allowing them to enjoy political status and market privileges that they should not have.
