Jiang Jingjing
Speaking of his first AI interview a few days ago, Wang Shuang (pseudonym) who went to college in Beijing was a little amused and crying. "During the recording, I encountered unexpected situations such as black screens and advertising pop-ups, which made me very nervous. Finally, I quickly clicked the submission button." Affected by factors such as the epidemic and the digital upgrade of enterprises, the AI interview has been widely used in the past two years, and more and more companies use it as one of the means to screen candidates for the first time. However, in the process, some controversy arose. ( China News Service )
answers the robot's questions seriously, it is said that this is called an AI interview. The birth and application promotion of AI interview products is not surprising at all. What it echoes is undoubtedly the transfer of authority in this era, that is, from individual rationality and empiricism to a decision-making system supported by data and algorithms. Human will and judgment give way to the calculations and judgments of specific systems. AI initially represented the extension of human subjectivity, and with more and more scenarios being implemented, AI has obviously been given more meanings.
AI interview seems advanced, but in fact it is just a modular splicing of the existing technology. The underlying rule for mainstream AI interview platforms is to use algorithms to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of applicants based on the semantics of the applicants’ answers, expressions, emotions and other dimensions. The main technologies involved are not complicated, such as expression scanning, semantic extraction, and trigger word recognition. From another perspective, the core logic of the so-called AI interview is roughly "grasping the wrong". The interviewer's small movements, dodging eyes, stuttering, etc. will be captured and points will be deducted.
live interview is more about performing well and adding points. In AI interviews, they tend to be more inclined to not make mistakes or reduce points. It can be imagined that what AI interviews can screen out are more skilled and decent "interviewed people", and not necessarily workers suitable for recruitment positions. Whether you can do a good job or not is nervous and cramped during the interview is actually not that important. However, AI interviews put these "secondary factors" in a crucial and decisive position, which is obviously putting the cart before the horse.
Every job seeker deserves to be treated seriously and sincerely, and the AI interview with the logic of the cold Bingbing has often failed to show such seriousness and sincerity. Such immature AI interviews are more like a company's work, flashy and unreal. Put yourself in a very superior position and arrogantly let the machine screen the job seeker first. When those sincere job seekers are stared at, tested and evaluated by AI, this whole process makes the two-way process of employment lose its original attractiveness.
[If you have news clues, please report the information to us. Once adopted, there will be a reward. Report information WeChat follow: ihxdsb, report information QQ: 3386405712]
