models equipped with Snapdragon 888Plus were only released last month, such as Xiaomi MIX4, Honor Magic3Pro, iQOO 8 Pro, but compared to only Snapdragon 888 slightly upgraded Snapdragon 888Plus, everyone is more looking forward to the next generation of technology. chip. According to media reports, the 4nm process Snapdragon 898, Dimensity 2000, and Exynos 2200 are all ready to go. Of course, users are most concerned about the Snapdragon 898 (expected to be named), because next year’s Android flagship phones will mostly be equipped with this Models of chips.
Recently, the running score of Qualcomm's 4nm chip Snapdragon 898 appeared on the Geekbench platform. It is a bit surprising that shows that the running score information shows . This chip is the new flagship of vivo that has not yet launched. The code name is vivo V2102A, not Xiaomi 12. Vivo X70 series will be released on September 9. X70 and X70 Pro are equipped with Exynos 1080 chips, and the super-large vivo X70 Pro+ is equipped with Snapdragon 888 Plus chips, so this flagship phone of vivo is not launched so quickly.
According to Geekbench's running points, the flagship vivo V2102A equipped with the Snapdragon 898 chip has a single-core running score of 720 points and a multi-core running score of 1919 points . The Snapdragon 898 version that appeared on Geekbench running scores is the same low-frequency version as the Snapdragon 888 released last year.
The iQOO 8 Pro, which was released last month, is equipped with the Snapdragon 888Plus chip. Geekbench scored 1135 points for single-core and 3738 points for multi-core. The single-core score of the 4nm chip Snapdragon 898 is 36.6% lower than that of the 5nm chip Snapdragon 888Plus.The multi-core score is 48.7% lower. Of course, it cannot be a "full blood version", but it is obviously a low-frequency version.
The previous revelations showed that the Snapdragon 898 will adopt a three-cluster CPU architecture, with an ultra-large core frequency of 3.09GHz, a large core frequency of 2.4GHz, and a small core frequency of 1.8GHz. Integrate a stronger X65 5G baseband chip, GPU is Adreno 730, comprehensive running score is expected to exceed 1 million points .
Snapdragon 898's running points, can it really reach 1 million? absolutely okay.
On AnTuTu's Android mobile phone ranking list, AnTuTu's integrated running score of iQOO8 Pro equipped with Snapdragon 888Plus is 840,000, and Mi 10 Ultra with Snapdragon 865 is 72. ten thousand. The iQOO 8 Pro is 16.7% higher than the Xiaomi 10 Ultra. Even according to this upgrade rate, the Snapdragon 898 mobile phone has a running score of 980,000. With the high-end version, it is easy to score more than 1 million.
So the world premiere of Snapdragon 898, will it be Xiaomi or vivo?
Although Xiaomi has ranked second in global shipments for two consecutive quarters, in the domestic market, vivo is the leader. According to a report by Counterpointer, a statistical agency, vivo's domestic market share is 24%, which is also the number one domestic market share for two consecutive quarters.
According to the prediction of digital media, the vivo V2102A, which appeared on the Geekbench platform, may be the new model of the vivo NEX series—vivo NEX4, which is expected to be released early next year.
Of course,Vivo also has a sub-brand iQOO . Xiaomi 11 was released on December 28 last year and got the world premiere of Snapdragon 888. iQOO 7 was released on January 11, also equipped with the Snapdragon 888 chip, only 14 days later than Xiaomi 11. However, iQOO 8 Pro has just been released soon, and iQOO 9 will definitely see you next year.
Therefore, Xiaomi Mi 12 continues to win the world premiere of the Snapdragon 898, which is still stable. In addition to the Snapdragon 898, Xiaomi Mi 12 will also use the Samsung E5 screen with LTPO technology for the first time. The rear main camera may also be replaced with a 50-megapixel outsole from 100 million pixels, bringing a better imaging system and becoming a new generation of explosives. Taste.
For the Snapdragon 898, what do you look forward to most, performance or power consumption?
.
