After and Pfizer entered the Chinese market, I finally gained a certain understanding of Pfizer after watching the endless publicity by a bunch of media accounts on the Internet.
Pfizer can treat new crown . At the beginning, my understanding was that Pfizer was not as good as the media said. We must know that more than one million people in the United States have disappeared after taking Pfizer. What is the effect?
Not long ago, a senior executive of Pfizer in China passed away due to COVID-19. This further aroused my doubts. Wasn’t Pfizer effective in treating COVID-19? Why are Pfizer’s senior executives still dead, and also because of COVID-19?
Just when I looked at the so-called miracle medicine with scorn, my colleague actually recommended this medicine in the office the next day.
The truth and falsehood of what experts on the Internet say makes people doubtful, and makes people completely believe that it is impossible. But my colleague is the person next to me, and he is definitely not a so-called second-rate dealer. If he can mention Pfizer, he must have used it and felt that the effect is good before recommending it. A colleague from
said: Pfizer is very effective in treating COVID-19. It can turn the antigen negative after taking it for two days. Now it is hard to find one Pfizer drug, and the scalper market has increased to 20,000 per box.
What my colleague said may be true. After all, he has no interest relationship with Pfizer. But I am still wary of Pfizer. Think of the Internet celebrity Hu Xijin who has always praised Pfizer. Now he is recovering at home because of his yang. He has been recuperating for six or seven days but has not improved. It took 12 days for his yang to turn back to yin.
If Pfizer is really as effective against COVID-19 as claimed online, why didn’t Hu Xijin get better in a short time? If he doesn't take Pfizer, doesn't it mean that he himself doesn't approve of Pfizer, so how can he convince others? If he does not get better after taking Pfizer, then it is time for people to reflect on the effectiveness of Pfizer.
Hu Xijin’s original intention was to give Pfizer a boost, but it had the opposite effect and made me even more wary of this drug.
The fact that one side was recommended by a colleague and the other side was the big V Hu Xijin, made me hesitate.
Then I thought about it and found that my colleague recovered after taking Pfizer, but his symptoms were mild, which does not mean that it was all due to Pfizer. My symptoms were not very severe, but I recovered without taking Pfizer, and I only took simple paracetamol, , , and anti-inflammatory drugs. Compared with Pfizer, which is extremely expensive, I really can't see any difference.
Instead of spending expensive prices on unknown drugs, it is better to buy some anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol to relieve symptoms, and rely on the body's immune function to recover on its own.
Even now I still have my doubts. What is the value of Pfizer’s role?
If mild symptoms have severe side effects, then Pfizer’s drug has failed. If it is effective for severely ill people, it means that Pfizer is still useful. If not, then it is really not even worth it.
Anyway, my colleague is taking it now and there are no abnormalities for the time being. See how your colleagues react later and then comment.
