Nongxin Cup China, Japan and South Korea arena rekindled the battle. In the second stage of the second game, the second Chinese player Jiaxi as the attacking team, challenging the second Korean player Jiang Dongrun . As an increasingly younger sport, it is already a difficult situation to see veterans over 30 face off to face the world competition. In this game, in various situations of wrong entry and wrong exit, a chess game was actually played under specific rules. Let’s take a look at the final game.
This game is a black man, while Jiang Dongrun is a white man. As far as the situation is shown in the figure, it seems to be a four-chasm cycle without any victory or defeat. But in fact, this is not the case. Regarding this small probability situation, the Go rules of China, Japan and South Korea have different regulations. According to the rules of China and Japan, the situation at this time is a false life and many disasters, and black chess should be sentenced to be lost. According to Korean rules, there is no victory or defeat in the four-tribulation cycle, and it is judged as a chess game, and both sides play extra game. In the end, since the organizer of the game was Korean Chess Academy , the chess game was also judged as a chess according to Korean rules, and the two sides played an extra game. In the extra game, Jae Jiaxi lost to Jiang Dongrun, sending the opponent to achieve three consecutive victories.
add-on chess meaning is not very meaningful. Let’s analyze the basis and purpose of various ruling methods under this situation. According to Korean rules, only chess that can be removed can be considered dead chess. In this game, white chess cannot be removed from black chess, so naturally there will be no winners in the four-tribulation cycle, and both sides will play extra games. The purpose of establishing such rules in South Korea is to try to simplify the rules, allow more chess appearances, and allow Go rules to be better popularized and promoted.
The rules of China and Japan rely on the theoretical basis for prohibiting homogeneity. The most specific example of the so-called prohibition of homogeneity is robbery. The theoretical basis for finding robbery materials is to prohibit homogeneity. However, since the initiative to rob or not in this game is in the hands of the white chess, the foul must be black chess, which is the so-called false life and multiple disasters. Black chess cannot avoid being sentenced to be sentenced to losses at all.
regulations are conducive to ensuring the fairness of competition, but are not conducive to the popularization of Go rules. Why is it beneficial to the fairness of competition? Take this game as an example. In the lower left corner, both sides are actually living on both sides. But in the lower right corner, the entire black chess dragon is actually a dead chess, while the white chess lives simply and clearly, but it is related to the lower left corner, so the black chess dragon is not defined as a dead chess. Therefore, in this situation, it is defined as a chess, which I personally think is unfair. Therefore, in this case, I personally think that the rules between China and Japan are more reasonable!
