After the match between the Chinese men's basketball team and the Bahrain team, a well-known media person posted an article questioning the Chinese men's basketball team's selection method. He wrote this: "I still can't understand why players who can't even make it to the nationa

2024/06/2706:48:32 sports 1689

After the match between the Chinese men's basketball team and the Bahrain team, a well-known media person posted an article questioning the Chinese men's basketball team's selection method. He wrote this: "I still can't understand why players can't even make it to the national team. , Why did the national team perform so well in this match? Did it even play a key role in turning the situation around? Are there any problems with your selection mechanism? Is it truly objective and fair? Meritocracy, not nepotism? " This media person's voice is also what many fans want to express. From the World Cup preliminaries to the Asian Cup, the Chinese men's basketball team has caused great controversy, Du Feng Is there nepotism? Should get out of class be over?

After the match between the Chinese men's basketball team and the Bahrain team, a well-known media person posted an article questioning the Chinese men's basketball team's selection method. He wrote this:

Against the South Korean team, Hu Mingxuan started the game and played 19 minutes. He made 0 of 4 shots, scored 1 point on free throws, had 3 turnovers and 4 fouls. The efficiency value was -21, the lowest on the team. Against Bahrain, Hu Mingxuan still started and played 28 minutes. Although he scored 9 points, his overall performance was still poor. Let's look at Jiang Weize . Against the South Korean team, Jiang Weize was not in the rotation. Du Feng suddenly activated him later and Jiang Weize hit two key three-pointers. Against the Bahrain team, if Zhao Rui and Sun Minghui were not sent out, it would be difficult for Jiang Weize to be reused. Jiang Weize played the savior and scored 20 points!

After the match between the Chinese men's basketball team and the Bahrain team, a well-known media person posted an article questioning the Chinese men's basketball team's selection method. He wrote this:

Jiang Weize scored 10 points in a row in the third quarter. However, in the fourth quarter, Du Feng still used Hu Mingxuan and Xu Jie to partner. The score was stretched, and Du Feng replaced Jiang Weize. This arrangement was extremely controversial. ! Guangdong's third young master performed extremely poorly whether in the world preliminaries or the current Asian Cup. Zhao Rui repeatedly acted emotionally and played big cards. Hu Mingxuan and Xu Jie had extremely low shooting percentages. However, Du Feng still used them again and again. In addition to the three young players from Guangdong, the performance of Zhai Xiaochuan , He Xining , Wang Zhelin and others are also struggling. Should they really be selected for the national team? Are there really no players better than them in the league? Not so. Players such as Jiang Yuxing , Zhu Xuhang , Tao Hanlin are no worse than them in terms of attitude or personal ability.

After the match between the Chinese men's basketball team and the Bahrain team, a well-known media person posted an article questioning the Chinese men's basketball team's selection method. He wrote this:

Judging from the two games against South Korea and Bahrain, it is difficult for the Chinese men's basketball team to go far in this year's Asian Cup. Although there are many X factors, other teams also face such problems. If good players can't make it to the national team, but so-so players can make it through connections, what's the point?

After the match between the Chinese men's basketball team and the Bahrain team, a well-known media person posted an article questioning the Chinese men's basketball team's selection method. He wrote this:

sports Category Latest News