On the 5th, a magnitude 6.8 earthquake occurred in Luding County, Sichuan. Later, an expert from the Sichuan Earthquake Administration came out to refute the rumors, saying that there was no direct relationship between the two. He also stated that animals cannot warn of earthquak

is the most eye -catching thing. A netizen said: To set up a "expert responsibility system", any loss and adverse consequences should be responsible for experts. The view of

has been consistently recognized by everyone.

(2)

's remarks about "there must be a great shock after the drought" can be traced back to the Spring and Autumn Period of my country.

Zuoqiu Ming The national book " Mandarin " written by records: Week Youwang two years (780 years ago), the three rivers of Wei, Wei, and Luo, West Week City Haojing (now Xi'an, Shaanxi, Shaanxi ) Earthquake, Qishan collapsed.

has now developed into the "drought shock theory", which was proposed by Chinese geologist Geng Qingguo.

he believes that the more severe the drought, the stronger the earthquake, and the wider the scope. Of course,

is of course. All of them cannot be simply summarized in one sentence. This is contrary to science. After all, it is not considered to be wrong in practice, and it needs to be treated dialectically.

(3)

for experts "must have a big shock after a big drought is wrong." In fact, it should also be dialectical.

experts use the United Kingdom as an example to deny the remarks of "there will be a great shock after the big drought". In fact, it is wrong to the author.

Due to the different national conditions and geological structures of the two countries, the theoretical comments should naturally be different, instead of using "the official official of the former dynasty."

Sichuan is at the junction of the plate, which is sensitive, and history has repeatedly indicated that there has been a shock after the drought. This is not a simple coincidence, but a rule.

Second, experts say that animals cannot warn the earthquake. This kind of remarks are actually arbitrary. After all, many things in animals cannot be explained scientifically so far. It is arbitrarily that this cannot appear very wise.

Earthquake occurs when the crustal vibration will emit a vocal wave that people can't hear, but most animals can hear, and the secondary sound waves are harmful. Animals cannot bear this kind of sound waves. Intersection

so the specific problem of specific analysis of is a positive solution, and it is impossible to confirm the crowd.

, what is your opinion?

I am a small book, I wish you happiness.