, Rao Yi published an article that was extremely vitriolic and outrageous.
Zhang Wenhong said: "The mysterious peak of Krong is coming soon, and getting out of the epidemic is a foregone conclusion."
In response, Capital Medical University President Rao Yi said disdainfully and aggressively responded to : Zhang Wenhong is purely a rumor: "No one in the world today can determine the direction of the epidemic, and no one can rule out that the epidemic will always accompany mankind, three times a year, and the severity will swing irregularly."
On the morning of December 24, scientist Rao Yifang published another article with sharp words, directly claiming that he had been exposed online, and also said that Rao Yi could be Zhang Wenhong's teacher.
The implication is clear. Principal Rao Yi may think that his age and academic level are much higher than Zhang Wenhong, so he can be his teacher. So what if he says a few words to him?
Rao Yi's criticism of Zhang Wenhong did arouse the disgust of many netizens and caused a big storm on the Internet. Why does
disgust everyone?
First, Principal Rao is a bit too pushy and arrogant. After being criticized by netizens, he became angry and talked nonsense. He even said that he was qualified to be Zhang Wenhong's teacher.
How does this sound like what a scientifically literate scientist would say? Is it true that if you are a teacher, you are always right, and if he is a student, he must be wrong in front of your teacher? As a great scientist, where does his face come from when he says such disrespectful words? Isn’t it ridiculous to say this in the new era?
The second is the lack of understanding of Zhang Wenhong’s words from the way a clinician speaks to ordinary patients.
As a clinician, he wants the patient to understand what he says so that he can deal with the disease according to his suggestions. The way he speaks and even the metaphors he uses may not be rigorous enough. What's the point?
The key is that ordinary people think that what he explains is clear and easy to understand. According to his suggestions, the effect is very good. People need and like doctors like this.
It is normal for experts to have disputes. Allowing various voices is a prerequisite for the error correction mechanism to be effective. But disrespecting people, slandering people, and setting the pace, is there any intention?
Rao Yi said that Zhang Wenhong is a "psychological masseur". In fact, he forgot, or did not understand, that Zhang Wenhong is a doctor. Doctors need to "occasionally cure, often help, and always comfort." Zhang Wenhong must be a psychomaseur to be a good doctor.
In addition, he also connoted that Academician Zhong Nanshan said: " In the 1950s, which is the era when Dr. Zhong Nanshan went to school, China's genetics was relatively old, and China's molecular biology could not exist because molecular biology had just started in the world at that time." Except for a few people who hold positions in the CDC and doctors across the country, except for a few who have studied molecular biology on their own and a few who have gone abroad to study molecular biology, most of today's senior scholars have insufficient molecular biology foundations, and some have many deficiencies. But they still use the name of experts to go to the media and openly tell lies. ”
When the situation became clear and the speaking context became safe, some people began to attack the inaccurate judgments of those who gave people light in the darkness.
When the epidemic in Wuhan was at its worst, Zhong Nanshan asked everyone to pay attention to safety and not go to Wuhan, but he took the risk of taking the high-speed train to Wuhan at his age. In the past three years of the epidemic, the contributions made by Academician Zhong Nanshan are obvious to all. Don’t you have the eyes to see them?
Zhang Wenhong was also on the front line when the epidemic was at its worst, and what was Rao Yi doing at that time? What contribution have you made in three years? Now he is even maliciously slandering and slandering Zhang Wenhong. What does Zhong Nanshan mean?
The epidemic is currently at its peak and the peak has not passed. As a scientist, he does not pay attention to the people's livelihood and the epidemic itself, and starts to slander his colleagues. Wouldn't it be a loss of humanity?
How to judge whether a person is reliable or not depends on his achievements. Tell the truth, do practical things, and pay attention to scientific justice.
Zhang Wenhong has been working in the Department of Infectious Diseases of Huashan Hospital since 1993. He has been on the front line and has always been consistent in his words and deeds during the three years of the epidemic. He is even one of the few doctors whose words and deeds are consistent. As for many of Zhang Wenhong's controversial content published on the Internet, either they are not what he said, and some self-media made up and amplified the remarks. Or they are taking his words out of context (for example, some people say that Zhang Wenhong once said that very few people have symptoms).
Zhang Wenhong is a clinician who has been fighting on the front line for three years against the epidemic. He is a hero and idol in the hearts of the Shanghai people. His predictions on the mutation trend of the new coronavirus are based on clinical experience and big data. It can provide a basis for anti-epidemic decisions, unlike the correct nonsense Rao Yi said, which is of no use. If Rao Yi is a true scholar, he should have the conscience and cultivation of a scientist. Otherwise, he is just a pseudo-scientist in name only. Here he is treating others in his own way!
When the situation is unclear and the road ahead is dark, it is very dangerous to express opinions because it is easy to make mistakes, but people with conscience still give people hope. I think both scientists and medical experts are doing this for the good of the country and the people. Instead of blindly affirming yourself and denying others.
Principal Rao Yi, raising conjectures and questioning questions are part of science. But the more important thing is to come up with solutions. It’s okay to raise questions. Then please come up with arguments to support your point of view. Otherwise, if you do casual things in the name of science, someone's capital tail can't wait to fall out.
Some people said: "Rao Yi can bombard Zhang Wenhong, but he must do it in the name of "entrepreneur" and not abuse "scientist".
The solution proposed by Principal Rao Yi is: " advocates nucleic acid testing for all employees. "
As soon as these words came out, most people were confused. The country has been adjusting its policies based on my country's epidemic prevention situation. Twenty articles, new ten. From nucleic acid for all employees to non-essential nucleic acid.
Why did Principal Rao Yi want to do the opposite?
It turns out that five biological companies under Rao Yi's name are involved in the nucleic acid testing business.
This plan hits the common people. There are many nucleic acid institutions in , and almost all of them have committed nucleic acid fraud. They have made it difficult for the country to make money and made a lot of money. The side effects that are difficult to distinguish between true and false are overwhelming, making people's lives miserable. They are all sinners who bring disaster to the country and the people! And Principal Rao Yi doesn’t know about this? The capitalist's fox tail is showing.
Relaxation is inevitable. The country has developed a variety of vaccines in the past three years, increased vaccination rates, built shelters, improved the level of ICU, and provided free nucleic acid for all employees. How much financial and material resources the country has spent, the people have a weighing scale in their minds. Moreover, the country has always insisted on dynamically clearing from to protect the physical and mental health of the people. Especially for some special groups such as the elderly and children, their immunity and resistance are not as strong as those of young people. Now it is time to let go. The virus toxicity will be reduced and the economy will improve.
Perhaps it is difficult for Rao Yi to understand the hardship of ordinary people's lives, and he cannot understand why there is no reason not to let go when the fatality rate and seriousness rate of the virus have dropped.If it is not liberalized, the country's economy will not be able to develop. Who will be responsible for the food, drink and clothing of the people? Too many things have been delayed by the epidemic in the past three years.
As a Chinese people, we abide by national policies and do not relax our precise prevention and control. Still take good personal protection and don’t relax your vigilance against viruses. I believe the dawn will be soon!
