Author: Sceptic Explorer
I saw a question and answer, the question is: Why do you feel that everyone laughed at "civil science", is there no great scientists among the people?
First excerpt the answers of several answerers, and then attach my comments from "Suspect Explorer" (see later). As follows:
small world big:
Guo Degang Give an example, you repair shoes and bicycles all your life, and suddenly one day you throw your hammer and say you don’t want to break the art of crosstalk and create a better form of crosstalk...
Even the basic rap inheritance does not have the idea of you breaking the things that others have been studying for the rest of their lives!
This is the biggest problem in civil science. They don’t even have basic physical concepts and common sense in basic subjects, so they overturn Newton Einstein... proposed this force and that force?
In the eyes of people with a little common sense, don’t they seem to be fools making jokes!
Dandong Mr. Guo:
Twenty years ago, I became obsessed with perpetual motion machine . I used my spare time to draw five drawings that I thought I could succeed. Some use gravity, some use leverage force, some use buoyancy force, some use centrifugal force, and some use liquid displacement balance.
Later, computers became popular and it became convenient to check the information. I found that five exquisitely designed perpetual motion machines that I thought were self-righteous were designed by someone a hundred years ago, and there were no less than one hundred types, and all mathematical formulas proved that they were not valid.
From then on, I no longer think about it and no longer believe in "a master among the people". Moreover, now I sneer at the moment whenever I see people who praise "the masters are among the people".
WILLSON39:
There are also folk science researchers who have truly research and achievements, especially at the beginning of scientific development a century ago. Physicists, chemists, biologists, and naturalists at that time could rely on a magnifying glass, a telescope, a microscope, and even just go out for more walks and think more, you can get results, such as Galileo , Darwin , and even the early Einstein. But now there are very few, because after all, the knowledge, equipment, materials, and even living conditions required are not comparable to those in the past.
The reason why the current "civil sciences" are often ridiculed is that most of them have incomplete basic knowledge (some people even only have the knowledge of primary and secondary school students), and they rarely have experimental research equipment conditions, and they don’t understand the history and current situation of domestic and foreign scientific research. They can only "dare to think and speak" and be confident that they "overturn evolution" yesterday, "overturn relativity" today, "making a perpetual motion machine" tomorrow, and ripe eggs the day after tomorrow can hatch chicks... The results are all without theoretical deduction and experimental basis. Because they really have no research or experiments, but just patting their heads to think of things.
Yunzhong Cafe:
These civil sciences have overturned quantum mechanics , proposed gravitational waves, discovered superluminal ... There are even denial of black hole theory, but there has never been a civil sciences who questioned the Yang Mills field theory . I guess the biggest possibility is that civil sciences cannot understand it.
Engineer Xiao Qin:
China's natural science community's civil science four major research topics in the new 1920s:
Relativity theory has been overthrown
Goldbach's conjecture has been proved
Conservation of energy has been overthrown
Impurity number is meaningless
China's social science community's civil science community's new century Four major research topics in the 1920s:
Armstrong's moon landing is fake
Pearl Harbor was bombed by the Americans themselves
Hiroshima Nagasaki atomic bomb was fabricated
911 is self-written, directed and acted
hahahahahahahahaha...
Integration of knowledge and action:
Civil science is not a folk scientist, but a scientist can be produced by the folk. Scientists need to obtain scientific research results according to scientific research methods. Adopting scientific methodology is the prerequisite for becoming a scientist. Civil science usually adopts some incredible methods to reach speechless conclusions, and thinks that they have found the truth.Universities and research institutions can also have civil sciences, but civil sciences are mainly from the private sector, so they are called civil sciences, which is a joke.
Explore Ancient Egyptian :
The word "civil science" has been ruined now and no longer refers to "civil scientists", but is basically equivalent to "anti-intellectual group".
These people lack the most basic respect for academics, and they even don’t understand what academics are.
Their main problems are as follows:
One of them, they are unwilling to study, and many people don’t even understand junior high school knowledge.
Academic research is based on the reading of a large amount of literature materials. There is no large amount of literature reading, just relying on imagination, just doing nothing academic.
The second is that it lacks basic logical thinking.
Logistics is a rigorous science. These things require a lot of training, which is what these people lack the most.
Third, it lacks the most basic respect for academic and academic norms.
As the saying goes, the ignorant is fearless. The most obvious manifestation can be achieved in these people.
first set a position, and then find evidence based on the position. All materials that meet your own position are affirmed, and all those that do not meet your own position are negative.
The fourth, the most outrageous thing is that they lack basic qualities and upbringing.
often attacks others personally and insults them. I have always felt that quality is something that should be possessed by kindergarten, but now I find that many adults lack quality.
What? Ask me, where is the evidence I said? Please move to my comment section.
Aoxiangying:
Scientists have been tempered and questioned by their peers for thousands of times. Their research results have been verified by experiments and cannot be questioned and overturned by anyone without resources.
As Guo Degang said, a boiler burner suddenly wanted to create a new genre of crosstalk, but he didn't even know the basic skills of talking about learning to sing. Where can I put those crosstalk seniors who have studied hard?
1986 I met a civil science department. The old man was in his seventies and suddenly brought a thick stack of "achievements" and said that he had burned the boiler for his whole life and found that the water could boil in less than 100 degrees. This is his record for his whole life. He asked us to apply for a patent. I felt particularly sad at that time because even a junior high school student knew that the boiling point of water was related to the altitude pressure. This old man actually spent decades to record the boiling temperature of the boiler and found that the water could boil without 100 degrees. This is a tragedy.
and then talk about Guo Yingsen . In fact, he just copied several of Einstein's terms, and was bragged by the scientific blind people on the entire network as "discovering gravitational waves", which greatly mocked China's scientific research environment. In fact, the most mocking thing is the hosts who asked him to come on the show and criticize him. Using other people’s dreams to play with others is sinister.
and there are also real civil sciences. For example, teacher Lu Jiaxi , Baotou No. 9 Middle School in Inner Mongolia. During his poor life, he solved the mathematical problem "Kokman's Conjecture" with an indomitable spirit, which caused a sensation in the world's mathematics community. He refused to invite him to teach abroad in many well-known universities in many countries. But sadly, it was not until he died of poverty and illness that the Chinese mathematics community knew from foreign media that there was such a person.
So except for the mathematicians who came from a professional class like Mr. Lu Jiaxi, most of the other civil sciences are fantasies, thinking that they have mastered the truth of the universe. I just want to ask: Do you think that people who are admitted to Tsinghua University and Peking University Chinese Academy of Sciences and master national laboratories are vegetarians?
Time and Space Communication:
I have said this many times, and I will reiterate it again:
Civil science does not mean folk scientists, nor does it refer to people who love science in the folk, but generally refers to those who are ignorant, think randomly all day long, and try to rely on some logical knowledge of eating, drinking, and defecating. If you pat your head, you will defeat a scientific discovery or scientific theory that has long been verified and recognized by the world's scientific community, or create a new discovery or new theory that shocks the world.
Researchers of the history of science call this kind of talent "delusional people" or civil sciences. Generally speaking, civil sciences mentioned on the Internet are such people or groups.Civil science is generally people who sing in opposition to the scientific and technological civilization that humans have formed. These people neither recognize and adopt recognized scientific methods, such as mathematics, physics and chemistry, and do not bother to let others or the scientific community verify their so-called "achievements".
Therefore, there is no distinction between people or non-folk. As long as people who have made major scientific discoveries or created major theories through various recognized scientific methods and can withstand verification by the scientific community, thus promoting the process of human civilization, are veritable scientists, both among the people and non-civilians.
And not all civil sciences are among the people, there are these people in universities and scientific institutions.
Once you know the concept of civil science, do you still think civil science is wronged?
If you still insist on thinking so, there is no room for discussion between us, because you have deviated from the scientific spirit and denied all the achievements of civilizations of mankind over thousands of years. How can we communicate? What other scientific consensus can be formed?
In similar articles or answers I posted in the past, there are always many netizens who commented later, believing that the Minji science is literally the meaning of a folk scientist or a folk science enthusiast. My explanation is just my own understanding and cannot represent others. But I will tell you again that the explanation of civil science is not my personal understanding, but the definition set by the entire scientific historians long ago, and has been agreed by the scientific community and the popular science community.
When discussing anything, we must first have a clear definition of the issue to be discussed before we can analyze it based on this definition. Otherwise, if you understand each other's own question, how can you talk about it together? As for whether this name is reasonable or not, does it hurt the hearts of the majority of folk science enthusiasts and researchers, and makes it a little confused. Whether to change a name is another topic.
Many scientists in history come from the people, and they deserve it.
lists a few of them: Faraday , Edison, Franklin , Watt , Einstein, etc., have made great contributions to promoting the process of human civilization in scientific discoveries and theoretical attainments. When they create this great achievement, they are not in specialized scientific research institutions. If civil science refers to civil scientists, then they are all.
But they are by no means the "civil science" that is now defined. Their research results have never been imagined out of thin air. Instead, they have been obtained by following the scientific spirit and scientific methods, and hard research and discovering under the world-recognized scientific framework. They are obtained based on respecting the world's scientific community .
Their discoveries and achievements can be strictly reviewed and tested by global scientists or non-scientists, and are proven to be correct and recognized and respected by the global scientific community, so they have become great scientists.
So, don’t stand up for the people’s science indiscriminately.
Menglanmomo:
hasn't even learned junior high school mathematics, and can't even hit the limit and integral differentials. They want to go and prove the Goldbach conjecture, but they don't even know the things like Riemann conjecture , right?
A bunch of guys who fail to pass the physics of junior high school, and those who don’t even understand the law of conservation of energy, always jump out to create perpetual motion machines and overthrow the theory of relativity!
A bunch of creatures have never learned anything. People who don’t even know what genetic recombination is, trait isolation , have to deny evolution theory !
and the so-called civil sciences often overturn this, proving that one, but their direct level is so low that they are ridiculous, ignorant and ridiculous, and they try to challenge the most profound theories without even getting started. This kind of behavior is originally funny.
Yu Pengkun:
"People's Science" is crowded? It is an organized anti-science!
In April 2021, the paper "Photo Geography" last article "Test Report on "Rebirth of Cooked Eggs and Eggs in Hatching Chicks"" made people exclaim that "civil science" has entered the academic position. However, the public opinion boom soon dissipated because civil sciences are available every year. This time it was just published in academic magazines, and it was not an amazing academic magazine. The impact was actually very limited.
Noisy pseudoscientific paper
Fortunately, the relevant departments did not only look at the surface, but continued to dig deeper into the root cause. After investigation, it was found that two of the authors of the paper were members of the so-called "Beijing Relativity Research Association". The "Friendship" actually has 38 branches across the country, covering more than half of the provinces. At the time of the largest number of members, more than 1,000 of whom are from abroad.
Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau After investigation and investigation, the organization was banned recently. Before it was banned, the organization published a pseudo-academic journal (English), held so-called unauthorized academic conferences many times, and approved the manufacture of pseudo-scientific instruments, which is a very bad record.
So far, this incident has exceeded people's imagination. There are many different opinions on how to evaluate groups like the "Beijing Relativity Research Association" and how to evaluate such behavior. Some people think this shows that "civil science and technology" have been united in order to expand their influence. Some people think this shows how dangerous it would be if the "civil science and technology" had the power.
The author believes that since the establishment of an illegal organization, the "civil science" in the past was not enough to summarize such groups and behaviors. Anti-scientific communities or anti-scientific organizations must be introduced to conduct effective discussions.
"Civil Science" and anti-science organization
In the early stage of the "Cooked Eggs Rebirth", the participants looked very much like "Civil Science". Because civil science always creates a self-proven system that is free from mainstream science, it can make some phenomena seem to break through the well-known scientific laws. In this incident, the author of the "Cooked Eggs Rebirth" paper used the method of experimenting with bystander witness as a means of proof.
"People's science" often means pseudoscience, but pseudoscience is not necessarily "People's science". The entire process of the "return to cooked eggs" incident is very different from the research of "civil science and technology".
Recalling the history of past research on "civil sciences", it is not difficult to find that "civil sciences" like the media the most, and when the media does not report it, it is most willing to go to the management department. If it is not accepted, the "civil science and technology" will interfere with the normal activities of academic research institutions and demand debate. Looking for popularity rather than profit is the most prominent external feature of the "civil science" in the past.
2011, "Ministry Science" Guo Yingsen (who also reversed the genetics) made a banner at Peking University and Tsinghua University
. The author of "Cooked Eggs Reborn" does not seek too high popularity. They just need their "commercial customers" to believe in this set. Not only do we not take the initiative to go to the highest institution to "fight" like the civil sciences, but we avoid overexposure. It turned out to be necessary. After media reports, the authors of "returning cooked eggs" suffered a devastating blow. A typical "civil science" will stick to one's own opinion even if it is exposed, and feel that it is because of persecuting itself.
It is precisely because the "civil sciences" really believe that they are doing science and conducting scientific research in purity. For a considerable number of them, for the sake of so-called research, they don’t want family, career, youth and even health. Therefore, "civil science and technology" often acts more extreme, which makes people feel both ridiculous and pitiful.
For example, "People's Science" Li Sanqing has long studied the "unified theory" and has lost everything. In order to express his anger that the theory is not generally recognized by the scientific community, he did two extraordinary things. First, it hit the gate of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, resulting in the administrative detention of by , and second, it was that it cut off a finger during a live broadcast.
These actions of the "civil science and technology" are certainly not worthy of advocacy, but this also shows that the "civil science and technology" cherish their "research results". The authors of "returning cooked eggs" are much more carefree. They are just a pastime after their careers have achieved great success.
In addition to purpose and mentality, there is also a difference in means between anti-scientific organizations and "civil science". Typical "civil science" likes to use extremely simple scientific tools to achieve major scientific goals, so it seems to be even more shallow in knowledge.Articles such as
"Cooked Eggs Rebirth" are usually written with relatively rigorous texts, and the arguments are self-consistent, and the format is even more different from those of typical "civil science" articles, so they are much more disguised. In this way, "cooked eggs are reborn" is likely to deceive the middle and low-end academic journals at home and abroad and disguise themselves as academic papers.
"People's Science" proves that the thin argumentation process of the Goldbach conjecture is very different from that of anti-scientific researchers
The root cause of these differences between anti-scientific organizations and "People's Science" is that "People's Science" does not have its own academic community, that is, there is no organization, while anti-scientists are organized, and have been trying to disguise their own anti-scientific communities as orthodox scientific communities.
is also pseudoscience. Everyone’s method of making fraud is different. Why can anti-scientists recognize each other and join forces? We can probably infer that it is power and money that plays a role. These anti-scientists rely on the pseudoscientific community and are more likely to package their pseudoscientific works into science, thereby transforming them into more power and money.
Therefore, some scholars believe that "civil science" is extremely powerful. But if you understand the difference between "civil science and technology" and anti-scientists, you will find that the one who can truly grasp power and use it for harm is actually anti-scientists.
After 2012, the voice of typical "civil science" has become smaller and smaller, and it is almost impossible to hear it in recent years. The reason is that the overall environment has changed. Scientists are no longer the ideal profession for middle school students. Although scientists are still praised in the compulsory education stage, they no longer blindly emphasize the strange temper of bringing glory to the country and scientists.
With the popularization of higher education, even ordinary people can recognize common "civil sciences", which has led to the behavior of "civil sciences" losing the halo of people's opposition to authority. Therefore, the author believes that continuing to call "civil science" a folk scientist or folk science enthusiast is a real disrespect for these two groups. In the future, false science enthusiasts can be replaced by "civil science" for short.
The emergence of mobile Internet has also transformed the media ecosystem. As long as the interest is low enough, materials with more ugly characteristics than "civil science" can be found on each platform. Under such circumstances, even the self-media is not interested in carefully reporting on "civil science".
The farce of water-to-oil cars shows that pseudoscience still has a large market
Although it is difficult to identify anti-scientific communities, it is very likely that anti-scientific communities are larger than scientific communities in research areas such as health, scientific weight loss, skin care, etc. But on the other hand, even if it is just to reduce anti-scientific interference, it will produce huge economic value. Therefore, just as human beings never give up on eliminating infectious diseases, we cannot give up eliminating anti-scientific communities and individuals that have caused great damage to Chinese science and have a tendency to expand.
"Suspect Explorer" commented on the so-called "civil science"
Why is Faraday not a civil science? The biggest difference between civil science and non-civilian science is that civil science and technology is that civil sciences all hate experiments.
How many scientific experiments did Farah first do? It is already so large that it is difficult to calculate. Just studying the phenomenon of electromagnetic force, we can verify that Faraday has done more than 15,000 experiments.
Faraday's statue
It can be said that the foundation of modern science is more inclined to experiments than theory. What civil sciences reject the most is experiments. How could this be the "main force of scientific and technological innovation"? It's just a delusion.
often see some self-media saying that Faraday is the most successful civil science in history. The reason is that Faraday is not a professional, but self-taught. The civil science community has always liked to show off itself and believed that under the suppression of "evil official science", civil science is the only hope for mankind's future. Under the advocacy of the civil sciences, the so-called " four major civil sciences " is circulating on the Internet, namely, Faraday, Edison, Tesla , and Einstein are all civil sciences. This is because they believe that none of these four scientists, who are well-known in the history of human science, have made outstanding achievements when working in official scientific research institutions. Therefore, these civil sciences shamelessly classified them all as civil science groups.This statement can confuse people who do not understand the concept of civil science. Some humanities scholars have no research on civil science groups, and even read their "blood and tears" and will sympathize with civil science groups. Here, it is necessary for me to clarify the facts, but first we need to figure out a few basic concepts:
The first concept: Is Faraday a civil science?
answer is no.
Michael Faraday , native of Newington, Surrey, England, was born in 1791 and died in 1867. There were not many "official professional scientific research institutions" in that era. In fact, it was not until the creation of Bell Laboratory that scientists worked in professional scientific research laboratories that became mainstream. However, Farah No. 1 has been working at the Royal Academy of Sciences, and he has worked in the Royal Academy of Sciences' laboratories very early. All Faraday's scientific achievements were completed in the laboratory of the Royal Academy of Sciences.
The second concept: Is civil science a scientific researcher or explorer "from the folk"?
answer is no. In fact, many civil subjects do not necessarily "from the people". The more famous Zhu Qingshi engages in " quantum true qi" and "quantum Buddhism". He is a real civil subject. Although he was the president of a university before retirement, he also has the title of academician. There are also some people with professorship titles whose professions have nothing to do with theoretical physics or biology, but they are keen on overthrowing the theory of relativity and evolution.
Faraday, from September 22, 1791 to August 25, 1867, he served as the president of the Royal Academy of Sciences
In addition, scientific researchers from the private sector may not be the civil sciences. You should know that there is another group called "Folk Inventors". Many people don’t understand the difference between folk inventors and folk science. Folk inventors are a compliment. And the civil science is a derogatory term. Folk inventors are people who engage in specific inventions and creations, and their characteristic is that they have a large number of experiments. Faraday, the inventor of the "father of railway locomotives", is a folk inventor of , and the inventor of generators and motors. In other words, all folk inventors are those who operate down-to-earth and conduct experiments by themselves. And civil sciences will not do experiments. There is a saying in " The Devil's World ": The difference between a metaphysicist and a scientist is that metaphysicists do not have a laboratory. Civil science is essentially about studying metaphysics, not science.
This is Faraday's laboratory.
However, according to the civil sciences, they are called the so-called "ideological operation", but after they put forward a series of great ideas of "overthrowing the mainstream scientific system in the world", they did not give any proof method. You should know that if any recognized scientific theory and who gives proof methods at the same time and fails to give proof, we can say that they are all hooligans.
The third concept: Is exploring science equivalent to studying science?
This is a very important concept. Many people think that I am interested in science and I am very eager to achieve success in the scientific cause, so I think hard that I must explore the truth of science. The problem is that exploring science and studying science are not completely equal. Of course, science needs to be explored by enthusiasts, but what is needed to study science is methods, and there is a complete set of rigorous scientific research plans. For example, to determine whether a drug has a definite efficacy, we need to conduct large-scale double-blind controlled experiments. Exploring science has a wide range of scope. Anyone who takes a camera to photograph the sky can also be "explored". For example, one day, I occasionally photographed a strange cloud in the sky, and said that the cloud was a UFO. In fact, exploration is just the starting point of scientific research. It is not enough to explore, and you need to further master reliable methods for researching science, so that you have embarked on the right path. If a person only has the interest in "exploration" but cannot correctly understand science and master the methods of scientific research, he is likely to be exploring science not just because he is exploring pseudoscience. In other words, there are tens of millions of explorations, and the directions of exploration by civil sciences actually belong to metaphysics and pseudoscience, not in the category of science.
The fourth concept: What does civil science mean?
Finance is a group of people who call themselves a group of folk science enthusiasts. However, it is different from science enthusiasts and non-official scientists in a broad sense. is essentially a "deceptive scientist" who dreams of not learning and overthrowing the science building by simply thinking about random thoughts. They think that "official" is wrong for self-proclaiming "the people" and only they truly love science. Civil science does not refer to "from the folk", and university professors may also be civil science. The key to identifying civil science is whether there is a scientific spirit, that is, the spirit of "using evidence to prove it", rather than the spirit of empty words, the spirit of standing sidelines, and the spirit of sensationalism."
Generally speaking, true science enthusiasts or amateur scientific researchers will be willing to communicate with the mainstream scientific community in a way recognized by the scientific community. That is to say, if they develop a certain result, they are willing to provide it to the scientific community to identify whether it is correct or not and accept the evaluation of the scientific community. The civil science community does not recognize the authority of the scientific community at all, because they believe that as long as they oppose them, they are bastards, including the scientific community, they are just a collection of deceivers to suppress the great people of science. They refuse to communicate with the mainstream scientific community in a way recognized by the scientific community. So, it is actually impossible for you to communicate normally with the civil science community. For civilians, everyone who recognizes them is their confidants, and anyone who does not recognize them and questions their theories must be their enemies. This kind of thinking of "either friend or enemy" is their common psychological problem.
So, why is Faraday not a civil science?
We need to understand what Faraday did in his life.
Faraday was a figure who had done a lot of research on electromagnetic force in the early days. In the field of electromagnetics, he is the real pioneer. Faraday was from a poor family since childhood. He was just the son of a blacksmith, but one characteristic of him was that he had a fanatical interest in learning knowledge. When Faraday was young, he occasionally listened to the speech of the chemist Sir David and was moved by his profound knowledge. Therefore, he decided to be a scientific worker in the future and devote his life to science. Every time Faraday listened to Sir David's speech, he was very pious. He sat in the first row, not only listened seriously, but also recorded his speeches, finally bound them into a book, printed them into a book and gave them to Sir David. Sir David was moved by Faraday's actions, and after talking to him, he found that he was a young man with great ambitions. So Sir David, the president of the Royal Academy of Sciences, arranged for Faraday to work at the Royal Academy of Sciences. At that time, the Royal Academy of Sciences had a physics laboratory. Due to Sir David's direct recommendation, Faraday became an assistant in the laboratory.
Pixie's permanent magnet type rotary alternator was manufactured in 1832 based on the principle of Faraday.
Faraday went to the laboratory of the Royal Academy of Sciences and was like a dragon entering the water. He was extremely excited and immediately focused on his work. According to his colleagues' recollections, Faraday had no interest in women, wealth and power, and was only keen on doing various scientific experiments. Sometimes, in order to study a newly discovered chemical or physical phenomenon, Faraday studied day and night in the laboratory, and even ate only two meals in three days, and had reached the position of forgetting to eat and sleep. Due to Faraday's contribution in work, he was gradually promoted to the head of the laboratory and finally served as the president of the Royal Academy of Sciences. It is worth mentioning that his leader, Sir David, and his predecessor, Sir Newton, have served as president of the Royal Academy of Sciences. So, how many scientific experiments did Farah No. 1 do? It is already so large that it is difficult to calculate. Just studying the phenomenon of electromagnetic force, we can verify that Faraday has done more than 15,000 experiments. When doing the experiment, Faraday summarized and summarized the experience, and for the first time proposed that an environmental field similar to the force line seemed to be distributed around the experimental equipment. Therefore, Faraday created the concept of "field theory" for the first time in the history of science, and the concept of electromagnetic field emerged.A long time later, Einstein drew on Faraday's concept of electromagnetic field and proposed the new concept of " gravitational field ".
This is an experimental device that can test the Faraday's electromagnetic induction law.
Note that Faraday first entered the laboratory of the Royal Academy of Sciences in 1801, and he first proposed the major research results of the electromagnetic induction effect in 1821. He made the first great achievement in his life after he had worked at the Royal Academy of Sciences for 20 years. This is also completely different from the fantasy of some people who imagine Faraday sitting in their own home to achieve results.
This is a sculpture commemorating Faraday.
Fara spent her first life in the laboratory, conducted countless scientific experiments, and pioneered the research on electromagnetics. He also invented the disc generator on October 28, 1831, the first generator invented in human history. Because of his great achievements in electromagnetics, he is known as the "father of electricity" and the "father of alternating current ". It is precisely because of Faraday's efforts that the foundation for mankind to enter the electrical era in the future.
In addition to doing scientific research, Faraday is also a learning madman. In addition to being able to speak English, he also taught himself to master French and Italian . He even has some research on ancient Greek . Will such a person who loves learning and scientific experiments be a civil science? Only the civil science community will believe such a ridiculous view!
I remember that physics master Lang Dao confronted a civilian subject like this:
I must say that your manuscript does not arouse my interest at all. Modern physics is a science based on a large number of experimental facts, and you are obviously not familiar with it. You want to use meaningless words to explain physical phenomena that you don’t know much, and it is impossible to get any results. If you are really interested in physics, you cannot imagine anything out of thin air. You must at least learn some basic knowledge first.
Landau
Also said again Don’t Einstein is a civil science department. In fact, this is a misunderstanding!
Success = hard work + correct method + less empty talk.
—Einstein
I often see the authors of some self-media articles saying that famous scientists such as Einstein and Faraday are civil sciences, but in fact they are misleading readers. Because the concept of "civil science" in these people's inner mental concepts is actually not the concept of civil science in the true sense. They mistakenly believe that "from the people" and "starting from grassroots" are civil sciences.
In fact, they completely misunderstood the concept. Because it is not the case.
Einstein
Vincentics may not be "grassroots"
I saw a netizen certified as " Associate Professor of , University of Chinese Academy of Sciences" on the headlines. His identity should be clear and there is no problem. But he has been saying that " Higgs boson cannot explain the origin of mass at all." So, what is the origin of quality? Someone asked him this question, and he immediately talked about a lot of things about Yin and Yang and Liang yin, saying that these are the origin of quality. I don't know what major this associate professor is teaching, but I'm sure he is really talking nonsense about quality. Because from beginning to end, he not only was unable to produce any scientific evidence, and could not describe his views in scientific and mathematical language, but he tried his best to lean on metaphysical concepts. In short, he is a person who never uses evidence to prove his personal ideas and has no scientific spirit. He is just talking nonsense. Although a person like
is also an associate professor and cannot be considered "starting from grassroots", he is just an absolute civil science. Therefore, whether it is a civil science does not depend on what professional title he has, but on whether the person has a scientific spirit and a scientific attitude.
In fact, some civil sciences are not as crazy and chaotic as we imagined. For example, I know a professor from Southwest Jiaotong University. He usually takes classes seriously and treats people with kindness and can't see any problems at all.However, he just likes to get stuck outside the professional research field that he is not good at and insists on overturning the entire quantum mechanics. This may be because his teacher taught at a young age had influenced him or misled him too deeply, because he said that his teacher was very dissatisfied with the entire scientific system and vowed to completely subvert it.
We now need to know the true meaning of the term "civil science", that is, people who do not have a scientific spirit, can only "talk big talk", try to overthrow the entire scientific system and establish grand theories independently. So, is Einstein, the founder of the theory of light quantum and relativity, who has always been known as "civil science", a civil science?
Einstein proposed the photoquantum theory
Civil science can also succeed, but it is not in the research field they are not good at
0Einstein is always called civil science by some people because some people talk about Einstein's "initial stage". After graduating from University, Einstein was unable to directly work in the university, nor did he join a professional scientific research institution, so some people say that Einstein is purely a "grassroots". Since "grassroots" like Einstein can achieve great success in the future and be praised as "the god of science" and "the ideological giant that has influenced the world for 3,000 years", can those civil sciences who also claim to be grassroots also follow Einstein's footsteps and achieve success?
I want to say that civil science can certainly succeed, but it is not in the field they want to overthrow, but in their own professional field, or in their own position.
For example, the professor at Southwest Jiaotong University should be relatively successful in his signal transportation major and has two tricks, otherwise he will not be rated as a professor.
There is also a Guo Yingsen. He was originally a plumber at Fushun Gas Company. If he worked diligently, he could do a good job in his position, and he might become a technician and model worker in the unit. This is also a success.
However, despite their own knowledge limitations, they insist on engaging in research fields that they are not good at. Moreover, those research fields have extremely high thresholds and are unwilling to accept the views and research methods of the mainstream scientific community. How can they not be tragic?
Einstein is not a Minke
Go back to the topic, is Einstein a grassroots? Let's take a look at his experience.
It turns out that when Einstein was in college at ETH Zurich, he did not like his teachers. This is because Einstein is a "thorny head". He always likes to find fault with the professor during class, and of course his professor doesn't like him anymore. In fact, Einstein's grades are considered middle and upper-level in the grade, not the best, but they are enough to rank in the top 20%, but he offended his professor. So, the petty professor gave Einstein a very low score in his graduation thesis. This is very serious. He originally planned to apply to stay in school or teach in other universities. This was a tradition of a family of Jewish intellectuals, but because his graduation score was too low, he was unable to find a teaching position in the university.
However, Einstein organized a small group to study science at university, and thus met and made friends with one of them. Through family relationships, Einstein found a patent-examination job in the Patent Office of Bern, Switzerland. Einstein just entered the Patent Office, so of course it is impossible to reach the top in one step, so he started from the grassroots level and became a third-level technician (equivalent to an assistant engineer).
Einstein just entered the Patent Office
And this is what some people insist that Einstein is the origin of civil science.
But what happened to the third-level technician? Which great scientist has not fought from the lowest position? Like Faraday, when he was young, he was originally a little assistant to a scientist in the laboratory of a Royal Society of England. Later, he also went up step by step and eventually became the president of the Royal Society! The same is true for Einstein. He started as a third-level technician, but because he was diligent and studious and diligent in business, he was promoted to a first-level patent after working in the Patent Office for three years.If we apply the current professional title, Einstein was already equivalent to a senior engineer during this period. This is considered a senior professional title and a senior intellectual.
In addition, we should not ignore the fact that the ETH Zurich where Einstein graduated is a world-renowned university with profound background and ranks firmly in the top ten. It has long been known as the "No. 1 school in the European continent"! It has trained 32 Nobel Prize winners, and if it is in the United States, Yale University can compare with it.
Einstein's alma mater is the number one school in mainland Europe
This "first school" has a high reputation around the world and has cultivated many industry elites. Some scientists or mathematicians who are well-known all over the world all work in this university.
Einstein is a great man to be able to attend such a prestigious school. His alma mater is indeed awesome!
Among Einstein's many teachers, there are some international academic masters who have been famous for a long time, such as the famous Minkowsky.
Minkowsky
As Einstein's teacher,Minkowsky is a well-known international mathematical master. He has made many breakthrough achievements in number theory, algebra and mathematical physics. He created the theory of the reduction of the real coefficient positive and fixed quadratic type, and this theory is called the "Minkowski's reduction theory". Minkovsky also tried to use non-European space to describe space-time structures, and independently proposed a new concept of four-dimensional space-time structures, which is called Minkovsky's space-time. Minkowsky's inequality and Minkowsky's fractal were also his ideas. Einstein followed this famous teacher and benefited a lot. Minkovsky also admired this young disciple who likes to think independently, and even regarded him as a friend. The master and apprentice often tirelessly discuss various issues together.
How do civil science evaluate scientific predecessors?
When we observe those civil sciences, they never refuse to ask academic professionals for advice and discuss issues, but directly shouted the slogan "Fist D Einstein, Foot T Newton Hawking". Even the civil sciences and civil sciences cannot communicate and discuss normally, but they despise each other.
Einstein himself received rigorous scientific training and a doctorate degree in this world-class research university. Just because his graduation score was too low, he temporarily rested outside of college. Einstein himself was trying hard to find a university teaching position and eventually succeeded. I don’t know why those articles that say Einstein is a “civilian science” never dared to write about Einstein’s educational experience and his doctorate. What are you afraid of? Can people like
really be considered civil science? It is a misunderstanding of Einstein as a civil science department.
Einstein won the Nobel Prize in Physics
We should also pay special attention to one thing, that is, Einstein had conceived general theory of relativity very early, but he felt that he needed a better mathematical language to express it, so he specially learned Riemann geometry from his mathematician friend. It was not until three years after studying that Einstein took out the refined general theory of relativity and published it. Compared with those who are extremely strict with himself, who are meticulous in their academic research, who are extremely strict with their knowledge and meticulous in their academic research, which is really a world of difference with those who know nothing about mathematics in junior high school and high school, who can't wait to throw out the "great theories" after just one stroke of his forehead.
So, if you say that Einstein is a "civil science" person, don't joke.
Einstein once had a famous saying, which is thought-provoking. He said: " success = hard labor + correct method + less empty talk. ". Looking at the civil science community, has nothing to do with any of the three elements. hope they can seriously understand this sentence and be touched.
"Finance Science" has never been successful throughout the ages. What's going on?
"Finance Science" does not come from "Folk"
I was just invited to answer a question in the morning, namely, "Why hasn't a single successful civil science been in ancient times and present? What is the reason?" The "Finance Science" in the
question, refers to a type of thought, not a type of profession. Author: Sceptic Explorer I saw a question and answer, the question is: Why do you feel that everyone laughed at "civil science", is there no great scientists among the people? First excerpt the answers of several answerers, and then attach my comments from "Suspect Explorer" (see later). As follows: small world big: Guo Degang Give an example, you repair shoes and bicycles all your life, and suddenly one day you throw your hammer and say you don’t want to break the art of crosstalk and create a better form of crosstalk... Even the basic rap inheritance does not have the idea of you breaking the things that others have been studying for the rest of their lives! This is the biggest problem in civil science. They don’t even have basic physical concepts and common sense in basic subjects, so they overturn Newton Einstein... proposed this force and that force? In the eyes of people with a little common sense, don’t they seem to be fools making jokes! Dandong Mr. Guo: Twenty years ago, I became obsessed with perpetual motion machine . I used my spare time to draw five drawings that I thought I could succeed. Some use gravity, some use leverage force, some use buoyancy force, some use centrifugal force, and some use liquid displacement balance. Later, computers became popular and it became convenient to check the information. I found that five exquisitely designed perpetual motion machines that I thought were self-righteous were designed by someone a hundred years ago, and there were no less than one hundred types, and all mathematical formulas proved that they were not valid. From then on, I no longer think about it and no longer believe in "a master among the people". Moreover, now I sneer at the moment whenever I see people who praise "the masters are among the people". WILLSON39: There are also folk science researchers who have truly research and achievements, especially at the beginning of scientific development a century ago. Physicists, chemists, biologists, and naturalists at that time could rely on a magnifying glass, a telescope, a microscope, and even just go out for more walks and think more, you can get results, such as Galileo , Darwin , and even the early Einstein. But now there are very few, because after all, the knowledge, equipment, materials, and even living conditions required are not comparable to those in the past. The reason why the current "civil sciences" are often ridiculed is that most of them have incomplete basic knowledge (some people even only have the knowledge of primary and secondary school students), and they rarely have experimental research equipment conditions, and they don’t understand the history and current situation of domestic and foreign scientific research. They can only "dare to think and speak" and be confident that they "overturn evolution" yesterday, "overturn relativity" today, "making a perpetual motion machine" tomorrow, and ripe eggs the day after tomorrow can hatch chicks... The results are all without theoretical deduction and experimental basis. Because they really have no research or experiments, but just patting their heads to think of things. Yunzhong Cafe: These civil sciences have overturned quantum mechanics , proposed gravitational waves, discovered superluminal ... There are even denial of black hole theory, but there has never been a civil sciences who questioned the Yang Mills field theory . I guess the biggest possibility is that civil sciences cannot understand it. Engineer Xiao Qin: China's natural science community's civil science four major research topics in the new 1920s: Relativity theory has been overthrown Goldbach's conjecture has been proved Conservation of energy has been overthrown Impurity number is meaningless China's social science community's civil science community's new century Four major research topics in the 1920s: Armstrong's moon landing is fake Pearl Harbor was bombed by the Americans themselves Hiroshima Nagasaki atomic bomb was fabricated 911 is self-written, directed and acted hahahahahahahahaha... Integration of knowledge and action: Civil science is not a folk scientist, but a scientist can be produced by the folk. Scientists need to obtain scientific research results according to scientific research methods. Adopting scientific methodology is the prerequisite for becoming a scientist. Civil science usually adopts some incredible methods to reach speechless conclusions, and thinks that they have found the truth.Universities and research institutions can also have civil sciences, but civil sciences are mainly from the private sector, so they are called civil sciences, which is a joke. Explore Ancient Egyptian : The word "civil science" has been ruined now and no longer refers to "civil scientists", but is basically equivalent to "anti-intellectual group". These people lack the most basic respect for academics, and they even don’t understand what academics are. Their main problems are as follows: One of them, they are unwilling to study, and many people don’t even understand junior high school knowledge. Academic research is based on the reading of a large amount of literature materials. There is no large amount of literature reading, just relying on imagination, just doing nothing academic. The second is that it lacks basic logical thinking. Logistics is a rigorous science. These things require a lot of training, which is what these people lack the most. Third, it lacks the most basic respect for academic and academic norms. As the saying goes, the ignorant is fearless. The most obvious manifestation can be achieved in these people. first set a position, and then find evidence based on the position. All materials that meet your own position are affirmed, and all those that do not meet your own position are negative. The fourth, the most outrageous thing is that they lack basic qualities and upbringing. often attacks others personally and insults them. I have always felt that quality is something that should be possessed by kindergarten, but now I find that many adults lack quality. What? Ask me, where is the evidence I said? Please move to my comment section. Aoxiangying: Scientists have been tempered and questioned by their peers for thousands of times. Their research results have been verified by experiments and cannot be questioned and overturned by anyone without resources. As Guo Degang said, a boiler burner suddenly wanted to create a new genre of crosstalk, but he didn't even know the basic skills of talking about learning to sing. Where can I put those crosstalk seniors who have studied hard? 1986 I met a civil science department. The old man was in his seventies and suddenly brought a thick stack of "achievements" and said that he had burned the boiler for his whole life and found that the water could boil in less than 100 degrees. This is his record for his whole life. He asked us to apply for a patent. I felt particularly sad at that time because even a junior high school student knew that the boiling point of water was related to the altitude pressure. This old man actually spent decades to record the boiling temperature of the boiler and found that the water could boil without 100 degrees. This is a tragedy. and then talk about Guo Yingsen . In fact, he just copied several of Einstein's terms, and was bragged by the scientific blind people on the entire network as "discovering gravitational waves", which greatly mocked China's scientific research environment. In fact, the most mocking thing is the hosts who asked him to come on the show and criticize him. Using other people’s dreams to play with others is sinister. and there are also real civil sciences. For example, teacher Lu Jiaxi , Baotou No. 9 Middle School in Inner Mongolia. During his poor life, he solved the mathematical problem "Kokman's Conjecture" with an indomitable spirit, which caused a sensation in the world's mathematics community. He refused to invite him to teach abroad in many well-known universities in many countries. But sadly, it was not until he died of poverty and illness that the Chinese mathematics community knew from foreign media that there was such a person. So except for the mathematicians who came from a professional class like Mr. Lu Jiaxi, most of the other civil sciences are fantasies, thinking that they have mastered the truth of the universe. I just want to ask: Do you think that people who are admitted to Tsinghua University and Peking University Chinese Academy of Sciences and master national laboratories are vegetarians? Time and Space Communication: I have said this many times, and I will reiterate it again: Civil science does not mean folk scientists, nor does it refer to people who love science in the folk, but generally refers to those who are ignorant, think randomly all day long, and try to rely on some logical knowledge of eating, drinking, and defecating. If you pat your head, you will defeat a scientific discovery or scientific theory that has long been verified and recognized by the world's scientific community, or create a new discovery or new theory that shocks the world. Researchers of the history of science call this kind of talent "delusional people" or civil sciences. Generally speaking, civil sciences mentioned on the Internet are such people or groups.Civil science is generally people who sing in opposition to the scientific and technological civilization that humans have formed. These people neither recognize and adopt recognized scientific methods, such as mathematics, physics and chemistry, and do not bother to let others or the scientific community verify their so-called "achievements". Therefore, there is no distinction between people or non-folk. As long as people who have made major scientific discoveries or created major theories through various recognized scientific methods and can withstand verification by the scientific community, thus promoting the process of human civilization, are veritable scientists, both among the people and non-civilians. And not all civil sciences are among the people, there are these people in universities and scientific institutions. Once you know the concept of civil science, do you still think civil science is wronged? If you still insist on thinking so, there is no room for discussion between us, because you have deviated from the scientific spirit and denied all the achievements of civilizations of mankind over thousands of years. How can we communicate? What other scientific consensus can be formed? In similar articles or answers I posted in the past, there are always many netizens who commented later, believing that the Minji science is literally the meaning of a folk scientist or a folk science enthusiast. My explanation is just my own understanding and cannot represent others. But I will tell you again that the explanation of civil science is not my personal understanding, but the definition set by the entire scientific historians long ago, and has been agreed by the scientific community and the popular science community. When discussing anything, we must first have a clear definition of the issue to be discussed before we can analyze it based on this definition. Otherwise, if you understand each other's own question, how can you talk about it together? As for whether this name is reasonable or not, does it hurt the hearts of the majority of folk science enthusiasts and researchers, and makes it a little confused. Whether to change a name is another topic. Many scientists in history come from the people, and they deserve it. lists a few of them: Faraday , Edison, Franklin , Watt , Einstein, etc., have made great contributions to promoting the process of human civilization in scientific discoveries and theoretical attainments. When they create this great achievement, they are not in specialized scientific research institutions. If civil science refers to civil scientists, then they are all. But they are by no means the "civil science" that is now defined. Their research results have never been imagined out of thin air. Instead, they have been obtained by following the scientific spirit and scientific methods, and hard research and discovering under the world-recognized scientific framework. They are obtained based on respecting the world's scientific community . Their discoveries and achievements can be strictly reviewed and tested by global scientists or non-scientists, and are proven to be correct and recognized and respected by the global scientific community, so they have become great scientists. So, don’t stand up for the people’s science indiscriminately. Menglanmomo: hasn't even learned junior high school mathematics, and can't even hit the limit and integral differentials. They want to go and prove the Goldbach conjecture, but they don't even know the things like Riemann conjecture , right? A bunch of guys who fail to pass the physics of junior high school, and those who don’t even understand the law of conservation of energy, always jump out to create perpetual motion machines and overthrow the theory of relativity! A bunch of creatures have never learned anything. People who don’t even know what genetic recombination is, trait isolation , have to deny evolution theory ! and the so-called civil sciences often overturn this, proving that one, but their direct level is so low that they are ridiculous, ignorant and ridiculous, and they try to challenge the most profound theories without even getting started. This kind of behavior is originally funny. Yu Pengkun: "People's Science" is crowded? It is an organized anti-science! In April 2021, the paper "Photo Geography" last article "Test Report on "Rebirth of Cooked Eggs and Eggs in Hatching Chicks"" made people exclaim that "civil science" has entered the academic position. However, the public opinion boom soon dissipated because civil sciences are available every year. This time it was just published in academic magazines, and it was not an amazing academic magazine. The impact was actually very limited. Noisy pseudoscientific paper
Fortunately, the relevant departments did not only look at the surface, but continued to dig deeper into the root cause. After investigation, it was found that two of the authors of the paper were members of the so-called "Beijing Relativity Research Association". The "Friendship" actually has 38 branches across the country, covering more than half of the provinces. At the time of the largest number of members, more than 1,000 of whom are from abroad.
Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau After investigation and investigation, the organization was banned recently. Before it was banned, the organization published a pseudo-academic journal (English), held so-called unauthorized academic conferences many times, and approved the manufacture of pseudo-scientific instruments, which is a very bad record.
So far, this incident has exceeded people's imagination. There are many different opinions on how to evaluate groups like the "Beijing Relativity Research Association" and how to evaluate such behavior. Some people think this shows that "civil science and technology" have been united in order to expand their influence. Some people think this shows how dangerous it would be if the "civil science and technology" had the power.
The author believes that since the establishment of an illegal organization, the "civil science" in the past was not enough to summarize such groups and behaviors. Anti-scientific communities or anti-scientific organizations must be introduced to conduct effective discussions.
"Civil Science" and anti-science organization
In the early stage of the "Cooked Eggs Rebirth", the participants looked very much like "Civil Science". Because civil science always creates a self-proven system that is free from mainstream science, it can make some phenomena seem to break through the well-known scientific laws. In this incident, the author of the "Cooked Eggs Rebirth" paper used the method of experimenting with bystander witness as a means of proof.
"People's science" often means pseudoscience, but pseudoscience is not necessarily "People's science". The entire process of the "return to cooked eggs" incident is very different from the research of "civil science and technology".
Recalling the history of past research on "civil sciences", it is not difficult to find that "civil sciences" like the media the most, and when the media does not report it, it is most willing to go to the management department. If it is not accepted, the "civil science and technology" will interfere with the normal activities of academic research institutions and demand debate. Looking for popularity rather than profit is the most prominent external feature of the "civil science" in the past.
2011, "Ministry Science" Guo Yingsen (who also reversed the genetics) made a banner at Peking University and Tsinghua University
. The author of "Cooked Eggs Reborn" does not seek too high popularity. They just need their "commercial customers" to believe in this set. Not only do we not take the initiative to go to the highest institution to "fight" like the civil sciences, but we avoid overexposure. It turned out to be necessary. After media reports, the authors of "returning cooked eggs" suffered a devastating blow. A typical "civil science" will stick to one's own opinion even if it is exposed, and feel that it is because of persecuting itself.
It is precisely because the "civil sciences" really believe that they are doing science and conducting scientific research in purity. For a considerable number of them, for the sake of so-called research, they don’t want family, career, youth and even health. Therefore, "civil science and technology" often acts more extreme, which makes people feel both ridiculous and pitiful.
For example, "People's Science" Li Sanqing has long studied the "unified theory" and has lost everything. In order to express his anger that the theory is not generally recognized by the scientific community, he did two extraordinary things. First, it hit the gate of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, resulting in the administrative detention of by , and second, it was that it cut off a finger during a live broadcast.
These actions of the "civil science and technology" are certainly not worthy of advocacy, but this also shows that the "civil science and technology" cherish their "research results". The authors of "returning cooked eggs" are much more carefree. They are just a pastime after their careers have achieved great success.
In addition to purpose and mentality, there is also a difference in means between anti-scientific organizations and "civil science". Typical "civil science" likes to use extremely simple scientific tools to achieve major scientific goals, so it seems to be even more shallow in knowledge.Articles such as
"Cooked Eggs Rebirth" are usually written with relatively rigorous texts, and the arguments are self-consistent, and the format is even more different from those of typical "civil science" articles, so they are much more disguised. In this way, "cooked eggs are reborn" is likely to deceive the middle and low-end academic journals at home and abroad and disguise themselves as academic papers.
"People's Science" proves that the thin argumentation process of the Goldbach conjecture is very different from that of anti-scientific researchers
The root cause of these differences between anti-scientific organizations and "People's Science" is that "People's Science" does not have its own academic community, that is, there is no organization, while anti-scientists are organized, and have been trying to disguise their own anti-scientific communities as orthodox scientific communities.
is also pseudoscience. Everyone’s method of making fraud is different. Why can anti-scientists recognize each other and join forces? We can probably infer that it is power and money that plays a role. These anti-scientists rely on the pseudoscientific community and are more likely to package their pseudoscientific works into science, thereby transforming them into more power and money.
Therefore, some scholars believe that "civil science" is extremely powerful. But if you understand the difference between "civil science and technology" and anti-scientists, you will find that the one who can truly grasp power and use it for harm is actually anti-scientists.
After 2012, the voice of typical "civil science" has become smaller and smaller, and it is almost impossible to hear it in recent years. The reason is that the overall environment has changed. Scientists are no longer the ideal profession for middle school students. Although scientists are still praised in the compulsory education stage, they no longer blindly emphasize the strange temper of bringing glory to the country and scientists.
With the popularization of higher education, even ordinary people can recognize common "civil sciences", which has led to the behavior of "civil sciences" losing the halo of people's opposition to authority. Therefore, the author believes that continuing to call "civil science" a folk scientist or folk science enthusiast is a real disrespect for these two groups. In the future, false science enthusiasts can be replaced by "civil science" for short.
The emergence of mobile Internet has also transformed the media ecosystem. As long as the interest is low enough, materials with more ugly characteristics than "civil science" can be found on each platform. Under such circumstances, even the self-media is not interested in carefully reporting on "civil science".
The farce of water-to-oil cars shows that pseudoscience still has a large market
Although it is difficult to identify anti-scientific communities, it is very likely that anti-scientific communities are larger than scientific communities in research areas such as health, scientific weight loss, skin care, etc. But on the other hand, even if it is just to reduce anti-scientific interference, it will produce huge economic value. Therefore, just as human beings never give up on eliminating infectious diseases, we cannot give up eliminating anti-scientific communities and individuals that have caused great damage to Chinese science and have a tendency to expand.
"Suspect Explorer" commented on the so-called "civil science"
Why is Faraday not a civil science? The biggest difference between civil science and non-civilian science is that civil science and technology is that civil sciences all hate experiments.
How many scientific experiments did Farah first do? It is already so large that it is difficult to calculate. Just studying the phenomenon of electromagnetic force, we can verify that Faraday has done more than 15,000 experiments.
Faraday's statue
It can be said that the foundation of modern science is more inclined to experiments than theory. What civil sciences reject the most is experiments. How could this be the "main force of scientific and technological innovation"? It's just a delusion.
often see some self-media saying that Faraday is the most successful civil science in history. The reason is that Faraday is not a professional, but self-taught. The civil science community has always liked to show off itself and believed that under the suppression of "evil official science", civil science is the only hope for mankind's future. Under the advocacy of the civil sciences, the so-called " four major civil sciences " is circulating on the Internet, namely, Faraday, Edison, Tesla , and Einstein are all civil sciences. This is because they believe that none of these four scientists, who are well-known in the history of human science, have made outstanding achievements when working in official scientific research institutions. Therefore, these civil sciences shamelessly classified them all as civil science groups.This statement can confuse people who do not understand the concept of civil science. Some humanities scholars have no research on civil science groups, and even read their "blood and tears" and will sympathize with civil science groups. Here, it is necessary for me to clarify the facts, but first we need to figure out a few basic concepts:
The first concept: Is Faraday a civil science?
answer is no.
Michael Faraday , native of Newington, Surrey, England, was born in 1791 and died in 1867. There were not many "official professional scientific research institutions" in that era. In fact, it was not until the creation of Bell Laboratory that scientists worked in professional scientific research laboratories that became mainstream. However, Farah No. 1 has been working at the Royal Academy of Sciences, and he has worked in the Royal Academy of Sciences' laboratories very early. All Faraday's scientific achievements were completed in the laboratory of the Royal Academy of Sciences.
The second concept: Is civil science a scientific researcher or explorer "from the folk"?
answer is no. In fact, many civil subjects do not necessarily "from the people". The more famous Zhu Qingshi engages in " quantum true qi" and "quantum Buddhism". He is a real civil subject. Although he was the president of a university before retirement, he also has the title of academician. There are also some people with professorship titles whose professions have nothing to do with theoretical physics or biology, but they are keen on overthrowing the theory of relativity and evolution.
Faraday, from September 22, 1791 to August 25, 1867, he served as the president of the Royal Academy of Sciences
In addition, scientific researchers from the private sector may not be the civil sciences. You should know that there is another group called "Folk Inventors". Many people don’t understand the difference between folk inventors and folk science. Folk inventors are a compliment. And the civil science is a derogatory term. Folk inventors are people who engage in specific inventions and creations, and their characteristic is that they have a large number of experiments. Faraday, the inventor of the "father of railway locomotives", is a folk inventor of , and the inventor of generators and motors. In other words, all folk inventors are those who operate down-to-earth and conduct experiments by themselves. And civil sciences will not do experiments. There is a saying in " The Devil's World ": The difference between a metaphysicist and a scientist is that metaphysicists do not have a laboratory. Civil science is essentially about studying metaphysics, not science.
This is Faraday's laboratory.
However, according to the civil sciences, they are called the so-called "ideological operation", but after they put forward a series of great ideas of "overthrowing the mainstream scientific system in the world", they did not give any proof method. You should know that if any recognized scientific theory and who gives proof methods at the same time and fails to give proof, we can say that they are all hooligans.
The third concept: Is exploring science equivalent to studying science?
This is a very important concept. Many people think that I am interested in science and I am very eager to achieve success in the scientific cause, so I think hard that I must explore the truth of science. The problem is that exploring science and studying science are not completely equal. Of course, science needs to be explored by enthusiasts, but what is needed to study science is methods, and there is a complete set of rigorous scientific research plans. For example, to determine whether a drug has a definite efficacy, we need to conduct large-scale double-blind controlled experiments. Exploring science has a wide range of scope. Anyone who takes a camera to photograph the sky can also be "explored". For example, one day, I occasionally photographed a strange cloud in the sky, and said that the cloud was a UFO. In fact, exploration is just the starting point of scientific research. It is not enough to explore, and you need to further master reliable methods for researching science, so that you have embarked on the right path. If a person only has the interest in "exploration" but cannot correctly understand science and master the methods of scientific research, he is likely to be exploring science not just because he is exploring pseudoscience. In other words, there are tens of millions of explorations, and the directions of exploration by civil sciences actually belong to metaphysics and pseudoscience, not in the category of science.
The fourth concept: What does civil science mean?
Finance is a group of people who call themselves a group of folk science enthusiasts. However, it is different from science enthusiasts and non-official scientists in a broad sense. is essentially a "deceptive scientist" who dreams of not learning and overthrowing the science building by simply thinking about random thoughts. They think that "official" is wrong for self-proclaiming "the people" and only they truly love science. Civil science does not refer to "from the folk", and university professors may also be civil science. The key to identifying civil science is whether there is a scientific spirit, that is, the spirit of "using evidence to prove it", rather than the spirit of empty words, the spirit of standing sidelines, and the spirit of sensationalism."
Generally speaking, true science enthusiasts or amateur scientific researchers will be willing to communicate with the mainstream scientific community in a way recognized by the scientific community. That is to say, if they develop a certain result, they are willing to provide it to the scientific community to identify whether it is correct or not and accept the evaluation of the scientific community. The civil science community does not recognize the authority of the scientific community at all, because they believe that as long as they oppose them, they are bastards, including the scientific community, they are just a collection of deceivers to suppress the great people of science. They refuse to communicate with the mainstream scientific community in a way recognized by the scientific community. So, it is actually impossible for you to communicate normally with the civil science community. For civilians, everyone who recognizes them is their confidants, and anyone who does not recognize them and questions their theories must be their enemies. This kind of thinking of "either friend or enemy" is their common psychological problem.
So, why is Faraday not a civil science?
We need to understand what Faraday did in his life.
Faraday was a figure who had done a lot of research on electromagnetic force in the early days. In the field of electromagnetics, he is the real pioneer. Faraday was from a poor family since childhood. He was just the son of a blacksmith, but one characteristic of him was that he had a fanatical interest in learning knowledge. When Faraday was young, he occasionally listened to the speech of the chemist Sir David and was moved by his profound knowledge. Therefore, he decided to be a scientific worker in the future and devote his life to science. Every time Faraday listened to Sir David's speech, he was very pious. He sat in the first row, not only listened seriously, but also recorded his speeches, finally bound them into a book, printed them into a book and gave them to Sir David. Sir David was moved by Faraday's actions, and after talking to him, he found that he was a young man with great ambitions. So Sir David, the president of the Royal Academy of Sciences, arranged for Faraday to work at the Royal Academy of Sciences. At that time, the Royal Academy of Sciences had a physics laboratory. Due to Sir David's direct recommendation, Faraday became an assistant in the laboratory.
Pixie's permanent magnet type rotary alternator was manufactured in 1832 based on the principle of Faraday.
Faraday went to the laboratory of the Royal Academy of Sciences and was like a dragon entering the water. He was extremely excited and immediately focused on his work. According to his colleagues' recollections, Faraday had no interest in women, wealth and power, and was only keen on doing various scientific experiments. Sometimes, in order to study a newly discovered chemical or physical phenomenon, Faraday studied day and night in the laboratory, and even ate only two meals in three days, and had reached the position of forgetting to eat and sleep. Due to Faraday's contribution in work, he was gradually promoted to the head of the laboratory and finally served as the president of the Royal Academy of Sciences. It is worth mentioning that his leader, Sir David, and his predecessor, Sir Newton, have served as president of the Royal Academy of Sciences. So, how many scientific experiments did Farah No. 1 do? It is already so large that it is difficult to calculate. Just studying the phenomenon of electromagnetic force, we can verify that Faraday has done more than 15,000 experiments. When doing the experiment, Faraday summarized and summarized the experience, and for the first time proposed that an environmental field similar to the force line seemed to be distributed around the experimental equipment. Therefore, Faraday created the concept of "field theory" for the first time in the history of science, and the concept of electromagnetic field emerged.A long time later, Einstein drew on Faraday's concept of electromagnetic field and proposed the new concept of " gravitational field ".
This is an experimental device that can test the Faraday's electromagnetic induction law.
Note that Faraday first entered the laboratory of the Royal Academy of Sciences in 1801, and he first proposed the major research results of the electromagnetic induction effect in 1821. He made the first great achievement in his life after he had worked at the Royal Academy of Sciences for 20 years. This is also completely different from the fantasy of some people who imagine Faraday sitting in their own home to achieve results.
This is a sculpture commemorating Faraday.
Fara spent her first life in the laboratory, conducted countless scientific experiments, and pioneered the research on electromagnetics. He also invented the disc generator on October 28, 1831, the first generator invented in human history. Because of his great achievements in electromagnetics, he is known as the "father of electricity" and the "father of alternating current ". It is precisely because of Faraday's efforts that the foundation for mankind to enter the electrical era in the future.
In addition to doing scientific research, Faraday is also a learning madman. In addition to being able to speak English, he also taught himself to master French and Italian . He even has some research on ancient Greek . Will such a person who loves learning and scientific experiments be a civil science? Only the civil science community will believe such a ridiculous view!
I remember that physics master Lang Dao confronted a civilian subject like this:
I must say that your manuscript does not arouse my interest at all. Modern physics is a science based on a large number of experimental facts, and you are obviously not familiar with it. You want to use meaningless words to explain physical phenomena that you don’t know much, and it is impossible to get any results. If you are really interested in physics, you cannot imagine anything out of thin air. You must at least learn some basic knowledge first.
Landau
Also said again Don’t Einstein is a civil science department. In fact, this is a misunderstanding!
Success = hard work + correct method + less empty talk.
—Einstein
I often see the authors of some self-media articles saying that famous scientists such as Einstein and Faraday are civil sciences, but in fact they are misleading readers. Because the concept of "civil science" in these people's inner mental concepts is actually not the concept of civil science in the true sense. They mistakenly believe that "from the people" and "starting from grassroots" are civil sciences.
In fact, they completely misunderstood the concept. Because it is not the case.
Einstein
Vincentics may not be "grassroots"
I saw a netizen certified as " Associate Professor of , University of Chinese Academy of Sciences" on the headlines. His identity should be clear and there is no problem. But he has been saying that " Higgs boson cannot explain the origin of mass at all." So, what is the origin of quality? Someone asked him this question, and he immediately talked about a lot of things about Yin and Yang and Liang yin, saying that these are the origin of quality. I don't know what major this associate professor is teaching, but I'm sure he is really talking nonsense about quality. Because from beginning to end, he not only was unable to produce any scientific evidence, and could not describe his views in scientific and mathematical language, but he tried his best to lean on metaphysical concepts. In short, he is a person who never uses evidence to prove his personal ideas and has no scientific spirit. He is just talking nonsense. Although a person like
is also an associate professor and cannot be considered "starting from grassroots", he is just an absolute civil science. Therefore, whether it is a civil science does not depend on what professional title he has, but on whether the person has a scientific spirit and a scientific attitude.
In fact, some civil sciences are not as crazy and chaotic as we imagined. For example, I know a professor from Southwest Jiaotong University. He usually takes classes seriously and treats people with kindness and can't see any problems at all.However, he just likes to get stuck outside the professional research field that he is not good at and insists on overturning the entire quantum mechanics. This may be because his teacher taught at a young age had influenced him or misled him too deeply, because he said that his teacher was very dissatisfied with the entire scientific system and vowed to completely subvert it.
We now need to know the true meaning of the term "civil science", that is, people who do not have a scientific spirit, can only "talk big talk", try to overthrow the entire scientific system and establish grand theories independently. So, is Einstein, the founder of the theory of light quantum and relativity, who has always been known as "civil science", a civil science?
Einstein proposed the photoquantum theory
Civil science can also succeed, but it is not in the research field they are not good at
0Einstein is always called civil science by some people because some people talk about Einstein's "initial stage". After graduating from University, Einstein was unable to directly work in the university, nor did he join a professional scientific research institution, so some people say that Einstein is purely a "grassroots". Since "grassroots" like Einstein can achieve great success in the future and be praised as "the god of science" and "the ideological giant that has influenced the world for 3,000 years", can those civil sciences who also claim to be grassroots also follow Einstein's footsteps and achieve success?
I want to say that civil science can certainly succeed, but it is not in the field they want to overthrow, but in their own professional field, or in their own position.
For example, the professor at Southwest Jiaotong University should be relatively successful in his signal transportation major and has two tricks, otherwise he will not be rated as a professor.
There is also a Guo Yingsen. He was originally a plumber at Fushun Gas Company. If he worked diligently, he could do a good job in his position, and he might become a technician and model worker in the unit. This is also a success.
However, despite their own knowledge limitations, they insist on engaging in research fields that they are not good at. Moreover, those research fields have extremely high thresholds and are unwilling to accept the views and research methods of the mainstream scientific community. How can they not be tragic?
Einstein is not a Minke
Go back to the topic, is Einstein a grassroots? Let's take a look at his experience.
It turns out that when Einstein was in college at ETH Zurich, he did not like his teachers. This is because Einstein is a "thorny head". He always likes to find fault with the professor during class, and of course his professor doesn't like him anymore. In fact, Einstein's grades are considered middle and upper-level in the grade, not the best, but they are enough to rank in the top 20%, but he offended his professor. So, the petty professor gave Einstein a very low score in his graduation thesis. This is very serious. He originally planned to apply to stay in school or teach in other universities. This was a tradition of a family of Jewish intellectuals, but because his graduation score was too low, he was unable to find a teaching position in the university.
However, Einstein organized a small group to study science at university, and thus met and made friends with one of them. Through family relationships, Einstein found a patent-examination job in the Patent Office of Bern, Switzerland. Einstein just entered the Patent Office, so of course it is impossible to reach the top in one step, so he started from the grassroots level and became a third-level technician (equivalent to an assistant engineer).
Einstein just entered the Patent Office
And this is what some people insist that Einstein is the origin of civil science.
But what happened to the third-level technician? Which great scientist has not fought from the lowest position? Like Faraday, when he was young, he was originally a little assistant to a scientist in the laboratory of a Royal Society of England. Later, he also went up step by step and eventually became the president of the Royal Society! The same is true for Einstein. He started as a third-level technician, but because he was diligent and studious and diligent in business, he was promoted to a first-level patent after working in the Patent Office for three years.If we apply the current professional title, Einstein was already equivalent to a senior engineer during this period. This is considered a senior professional title and a senior intellectual.
In addition, we should not ignore the fact that the ETH Zurich where Einstein graduated is a world-renowned university with profound background and ranks firmly in the top ten. It has long been known as the "No. 1 school in the European continent"! It has trained 32 Nobel Prize winners, and if it is in the United States, Yale University can compare with it.
Einstein's alma mater is the number one school in mainland Europe
This "first school" has a high reputation around the world and has cultivated many industry elites. Some scientists or mathematicians who are well-known all over the world all work in this university.
Einstein is a great man to be able to attend such a prestigious school. His alma mater is indeed awesome!
Among Einstein's many teachers, there are some international academic masters who have been famous for a long time, such as the famous Minkowsky.
Minkowsky
As Einstein's teacher,Minkowsky is a well-known international mathematical master. He has made many breakthrough achievements in number theory, algebra and mathematical physics. He created the theory of the reduction of the real coefficient positive and fixed quadratic type, and this theory is called the "Minkowski's reduction theory". Minkovsky also tried to use non-European space to describe space-time structures, and independently proposed a new concept of four-dimensional space-time structures, which is called Minkovsky's space-time. Minkowsky's inequality and Minkowsky's fractal were also his ideas. Einstein followed this famous teacher and benefited a lot. Minkovsky also admired this young disciple who likes to think independently, and even regarded him as a friend. The master and apprentice often tirelessly discuss various issues together.
How do civil science evaluate scientific predecessors?
When we observe those civil sciences, they never refuse to ask academic professionals for advice and discuss issues, but directly shouted the slogan "Fist D Einstein, Foot T Newton Hawking". Even the civil sciences and civil sciences cannot communicate and discuss normally, but they despise each other.
Einstein himself received rigorous scientific training and a doctorate degree in this world-class research university. Just because his graduation score was too low, he temporarily rested outside of college. Einstein himself was trying hard to find a university teaching position and eventually succeeded. I don’t know why those articles that say Einstein is a “civilian science” never dared to write about Einstein’s educational experience and his doctorate. What are you afraid of? Can people like
really be considered civil science? It is a misunderstanding of Einstein as a civil science department.
Einstein won the Nobel Prize in Physics
We should also pay special attention to one thing, that is, Einstein had conceived general theory of relativity very early, but he felt that he needed a better mathematical language to express it, so he specially learned Riemann geometry from his mathematician friend. It was not until three years after studying that Einstein took out the refined general theory of relativity and published it. Compared with those who are extremely strict with himself, who are meticulous in their academic research, who are extremely strict with their knowledge and meticulous in their academic research, which is really a world of difference with those who know nothing about mathematics in junior high school and high school, who can't wait to throw out the "great theories" after just one stroke of his forehead.
So, if you say that Einstein is a "civil science" person, don't joke.
Einstein once had a famous saying, which is thought-provoking. He said: " success = hard labor + correct method + less empty talk. ". Looking at the civil science community, has nothing to do with any of the three elements. hope they can seriously understand this sentence and be touched.
"Finance Science" has never been successful throughout the ages. What's going on?
"Finance Science" does not come from "Folk"
I was just invited to answer a question in the morning, namely, "Why hasn't a single successful civil science been in ancient times and present? What is the reason?" The "Finance Science" in the
question, refers to a type of thought, not a type of profession.
What is the typical folk science
? It is a kind of idea that does not have the spirit of practice or experimental spirit, is unwilling to be down-to-earth, endure hardships, and only has ambitions and boastful talks, and also wants to be famous for all generations and forever.
It should be pointed out that 's "civil science" does not come from "civil science", because there are also civil sciences in universities. "People's science" does not mean non-mainstream, because non-mainstream and mainstream are not incompatible. Strictly speaking, "civil science" is "pseudoscience metaphysical delusion thinker".
There are many ways to identify whether a person is a "civil science". For example, if I have experience like me, I can let them show their prototypes through rich experience in more than ten seconds. There is an unexceptional feature among the "civil science" group, that is, 's contempt - or even contempt - the experimental process. means that "civil science" basically does not conduct experiments. Even a few so-called "experiments" in civil sciences do "experiments" completely according to their imagination, and cannot even be called experiments.
If you follow the definition of "civil sciences" by themselves, Madame Curie is a standard civil sciences. This is because Madame Curie, a Polish-born, had no proper profession before she became famous. She only worked as an assistant to her mentor for a short period of time after graduating from college, and then became unemployed and at home.
Madame Curie
When did Madame Curie become famous? It was in 1902 that Madame Curie began to become famous after she extracted radium—a strong radiation substance. The discovery of radium brought great honor to Madame Curie. The most important three are all from 1903: a doctorate from the University of Paris, the "David Medal" of the Royal Society, and the Nobel Prize in Physics.
It was not until 1904 that Madame Curie began to have her first legitimate career in her life: Solburn hired her as director of the physics laboratory. According to some "civil science" on the Internet, even if Madame Curie became an "official science" in 1904, before that, she could only be regarded as a "civil science".
But this is a totally shameless statement! Whether
is a "civil science" is only related to a person's way of thinking, and has nothing to do with career, education, or professional title. Let's see how Madame Curie explores science!
In November 1895, German scientist Rongen discovered X-rays while studying cathode rays. After the X-ray was discovered, a large number of scientists followed up and started researching radiation elements. Soon, French physicist Becquerell discovered that a compound called uranium hydrogenolefin (i.e., uranium salt) can emit rays. This discovery attracted strong attention from Madame Curie, who and her husband felt that this phenomenon is worthy of careful study.
At this time, Madame Curie had left the school, had no career, but was just a housewife. How could she have her own laboratory? Thanks to her husband, she helped her find a dark, small and wet basement in the middle school she teaches. It is this basement, a place where even pigs and dogs are unwilling to stay, and has become the starting point for the Curie couple to move towards scientific glory.
If it is a civil science, what kind of experiment is not willing to do? They like to sit at home and shoot the sky spirit cover. With one slap, Einstein was overthrown, and with another slap, it was so easy, Newton and Hawking were beaten down!
to do experiment? It is impossible to do experiments in this life.
The hardships of doing the experiment, you can't imagine how difficult it is for the Curie couple to do this experiment?
The first one is physical fatigue.
They searched for various minerals and found that in addition to uranium and another mysterious material element also had radiation, and the radiation was three times stronger than the axis. In order to extract this unknown element, they need to screen tons of bitumen uranium ore. The specific step is to fill all the bitumen uranium ore into several large barrels, add some chemical reagents, and some corrosive acids, and then burn these barrels over fire to allow the bitumenium ore to boil with other mixtures. Madame Curie was stirring in the bucket with a very heavy iron rod. This is a very hard work.Madame Curie is a thin woman who has always been undernourished due to her poor family. It was such a weak woman who was not strong enough, holding such a heavy iron rod and stirring this kind of sticky and thick thing day and night. After working for a while, she was exhausted and sweating profusely. With flames and hot steam, the temperature in the basement was extremely high, making such a working environment extremely difficult. But she insisted on for four years!
The second is that the working environment is toxic.
Asphalt uranium mine itself has toxins that are harmful to the human body. Now they need to light a fire and boil them into a pot of porridge. The toxins and water vapor are mixed together and spread into the air. But their laboratory is a basement, which is almost airtight and does not even have half a window, so these poisonous smoke and an unbearable and vomiting strange smell are tormenting Madame Curie. Sometimes when Madame Curie smells too much of this poisonous smoke, she will feel heart rate abnormal, dizzy, and even faint a few times. But once her body recovered slightly, she immediately devoted herself to her own work.
The elderly Madam Curie is still working selflessly
The third is that it is extremely lack of scientific research funds.
The unknown radiation element they were looking for was extremely high in bitumen uranium ore, so the experiment required a large amount of this mineral. But buying them requires a lot of money. Madame Curie has no income, her husband is not well paid, and she can't afford expensive asphalt uranium mines. In order to continue this experiment, they asked people everywhere and finally got a ton of free uranium ore waste. But the shipping fee can no longer be paid. For this reason, Madame Curie also went to other schools to attend classes and paid for the shipping fee.
The point of view was rejected? what to do?
After working day and night, they finally discovered polonium and radium in the third year of the experiment. But when she read the research report at the French Academy of Sciences, her statement encountered unanimous opposition. Because the French Academy of Sciences asked her to present the experimental samples, otherwise it would not be recognized.
Madame Curie immediately devoted herself to the work of refining radium. If it is a civil science, once his views are rejected by the scientific community, they will definitely immediately curse and roll on the tantrum. The way they prove themselves is to prove that "the Academy of Sciences is a black society" and "the scientific community collectively suppresses Copernicus", rather than to provide conclusive evidence to prove that they are right.
The reason why Madame Curie is not a civil science is because she knows to convince people with reason. This theory is not about "selling misery" everywhere outside to gain sympathy, not criticizing the "persecution" of the scientific community, or posting big-character posters everywhere, as if you can win by keeping publicity. In order to prove herself, Madame Curie immediately devoted herself to her selfless work and returned to the "hell" laboratory with poisonous smoke, bad smell, and hot and stuffy heat, and spoke with the results of the experiment. After more than a year of hard work, Madame Curie finally extracted 1/10 grams of radium chloride from a large pile of slag! Experiments have shown that the element radium is 400 times stronger than the radiation on the axis. And she consumed a full eight tons of asphalt uranium ore for this and lost 30 kilograms herself!
How could Madame Curie achieve such great scientific achievements without the hard tempering in "hell" and the spirit of dedication to the cause of science! May I ask, which "civil science" has the noble spirit of Madame Curie? They said "cooked eggs are reborn", sometimes they said "eating genetically modified is toxic", and sometimes they said that they invented the "permanent motion machine", but they never talked about experimental data. Once they encounter doubts from the outside world, they become "tragic Bruno", as if they are "scientific great men" persecuted by dark forces, and are happy with the "truth incarnation". In fact, they are just a group of delusional people who do not understand the true meaning of science.
How to treat personal honors?
The reason why "Ministry" is different from great people like Madame Curie lies in their different attitudes towards honor.
Medal
Madame Curie won the Nobel Prize twice, one for the Prize in Physics and the other for the Prize in Chemistry. She won more than 100 scientific research institutions or members of scientific studies in the world, but she despises these honors. She even hangs the precious Nobel Prize medal to her daughter as a toy on her neck.
On the other hand, "Civil Science" clearly cannot produce any experimental proof, but can't wait to name the so-called "theory" after its own name. A "ministrative science" named Wang xmin, actually named more than 200 "theories" directly after his own name. Compared with Madame Curie, who is so happy to be successful and seek fame, this is really a world of difference with Madame Curie, who has no desire for personal honor!
The reason why "civil science" has never been successful throughout history is not without reason.
Let us remember the great Madame Curie and move forward under the guidance of the scientific spirit.
( Author: Sceptic Explorer )
Madame Curie is a thin woman who has always been undernourished due to her poor family. It was such a weak woman who was not strong enough, holding such a heavy iron rod and stirring this kind of sticky and thick thing day and night. After working for a while, she was exhausted and sweating profusely. With flames and hot steam, the temperature in the basement was extremely high, making such a working environment extremely difficult. But she insisted on for four years!The second is that the working environment is toxic.
Asphalt uranium mine itself has toxins that are harmful to the human body. Now they need to light a fire and boil them into a pot of porridge. The toxins and water vapor are mixed together and spread into the air. But their laboratory is a basement, which is almost airtight and does not even have half a window, so these poisonous smoke and an unbearable and vomiting strange smell are tormenting Madame Curie. Sometimes when Madame Curie smells too much of this poisonous smoke, she will feel heart rate abnormal, dizzy, and even faint a few times. But once her body recovered slightly, she immediately devoted herself to her own work.
The elderly Madam Curie is still working selflessly
The third is that it is extremely lack of scientific research funds.
The unknown radiation element they were looking for was extremely high in bitumen uranium ore, so the experiment required a large amount of this mineral. But buying them requires a lot of money. Madame Curie has no income, her husband is not well paid, and she can't afford expensive asphalt uranium mines. In order to continue this experiment, they asked people everywhere and finally got a ton of free uranium ore waste. But the shipping fee can no longer be paid. For this reason, Madame Curie also went to other schools to attend classes and paid for the shipping fee.
The point of view was rejected? what to do?
After working day and night, they finally discovered polonium and radium in the third year of the experiment. But when she read the research report at the French Academy of Sciences, her statement encountered unanimous opposition. Because the French Academy of Sciences asked her to present the experimental samples, otherwise it would not be recognized.
Madame Curie immediately devoted herself to the work of refining radium. If it is a civil science, once his views are rejected by the scientific community, they will definitely immediately curse and roll on the tantrum. The way they prove themselves is to prove that "the Academy of Sciences is a black society" and "the scientific community collectively suppresses Copernicus", rather than to provide conclusive evidence to prove that they are right.
The reason why Madame Curie is not a civil science is because she knows to convince people with reason. This theory is not about "selling misery" everywhere outside to gain sympathy, not criticizing the "persecution" of the scientific community, or posting big-character posters everywhere, as if you can win by keeping publicity. In order to prove herself, Madame Curie immediately devoted herself to her selfless work and returned to the "hell" laboratory with poisonous smoke, bad smell, and hot and stuffy heat, and spoke with the results of the experiment. After more than a year of hard work, Madame Curie finally extracted 1/10 grams of radium chloride from a large pile of slag! Experiments have shown that the element radium is 400 times stronger than the radiation on the axis. And she consumed a full eight tons of asphalt uranium ore for this and lost 30 kilograms herself!
How could Madame Curie achieve such great scientific achievements without the hard tempering in "hell" and the spirit of dedication to the cause of science! May I ask, which "civil science" has the noble spirit of Madame Curie? They said "cooked eggs are reborn", sometimes they said "eating genetically modified is toxic", and sometimes they said that they invented the "permanent motion machine", but they never talked about experimental data. Once they encounter doubts from the outside world, they become "tragic Bruno", as if they are "scientific great men" persecuted by dark forces, and are happy with the "truth incarnation". In fact, they are just a group of delusional people who do not understand the true meaning of science.
How to treat personal honors?
The reason why "Ministry" is different from great people like Madame Curie lies in their different attitudes towards honor.
Medal
Madame Curie won the Nobel Prize twice, one for the Prize in Physics and the other for the Prize in Chemistry. She won more than 100 scientific research institutions or members of scientific studies in the world, but she despises these honors. She even hangs the precious Nobel Prize medal to her daughter as a toy on her neck.
On the other hand, "Civil Science" clearly cannot produce any experimental proof, but can't wait to name the so-called "theory" after its own name. A "ministrative science" named Wang xmin, actually named more than 200 "theories" directly after his own name. Compared with Madame Curie, who is so happy to be successful and seek fame, this is really a world of difference with Madame Curie, who has no desire for personal honor!
The reason why "civil science" has never been successful throughout history is not without reason.
Let us remember the great Madame Curie and move forward under the guidance of the scientific spirit.
( Author: Sceptic Explorer )
