Quantum entanglement seems to be very profound, and what is difficult to understand is its superposition state. Although we know that there are no cats that are dead and alive in the world, there will be no particles that are both positive and reverse. In common sense, he should have and can only have one state at this moment. What we are talking about is nothing more than that we cannot confirm. What cannot be confirmed and observed is the person rather than the particle itself. His state remains unchanged, but human confirmation requires time and verifiability. The wave-particle duality of
light seems to prove that photon has two characteristics at the same time. Are we ignoring the fact that matter itself does not necessarily have only one characteristic, and waves and particles are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Waves do not transmit matter but only energy, but the impact of energy on objects forms particle characteristics. In other words, as long as there is no blocking, no matter whether you observe it or not, it is the form of waves. The reason you observe particle form is because you block its kinetic energy.
The wind blows the willows, and we sense the wind through the movement of the trees. Is there no wind when the tree is not moving? When we study the wind, we need to find an obstacle to analyze whether there is wind and how strong the wind is. We are used to studying things with the help of other things, but we cannot analyze things independently.
Is science the law of causality ? Is there a mutual causal relationship, and is there a law of cause and effect? People are used to asking a reason for any question. I am also accustomed to dismembering a thing and studying it one by one. But some things have no reason, and the decomposed limbs cannot be recombined into life.
Can quantum entanglement be viewed like this? Treat him not to oppose him as a whole. That is to say, we can only see one side of him and not the other side every time, but we can all know the existence of the other side. He has always been there but we can't observe it. But he has not changed, what has changed is the perspective of our observation. He is a concept of a whole, but is artificially divided by us and given a certain specific meaning alone.
As a whole, there is no concept of spatial distance , so no matter how many dozen kilometers or billions of light years, when we see a shoe on the left, we will immediately know that the other one is on the right.
thinks it as a whole and has no time to shuttle. So whether it is far away or near in front of us, we can get it immediately at the same time when we see one of them, and it is almost unnecessary to participate in it.
treats him as a whole and has no cause and result, because he is the cause and also the result. Because we artificially define black or white, then because the side we see is black, the other side is white, and vice versa.
Overall, there are no so-called elementary particles, and even if there are, they will not be combined into a world of various shapes. The natural world and we are also a whole. The difference depends entirely on the observer's perspective. Everyone's world is different. Everyone has different beliefs, different cognitions, different abilities, and different feelings. The sum of all these different things is the real world. Our science, consciousness is just one-sided cognition.
If God has it, it is also just a part of the world. He cannot be the Creator, because he created all things and he is in a contradiction with whom he created.
Two adults said let’s build one person, create a beautiful and smart boy, and then there is one. No one will believe such a story. Because life is not planned, not imagined, it is uncontrollable. Life is an unexpected product of passion.
Life is like this, so what about the production of matter? It should be a coincidence factor. As for whether it is the Big Bang or the white hole , it is the beginning of another brain-burning story.
