1969, in the concern of people around the world, American astronaut Armstrong drove Apollo 11 to the moon.
The first person to land on the moon
Afterwards, many people said that Apollo spacecraft Moon landing is a fake, but in fact this is a farce staged by Americans after the screen. Is
true or false? The Chinese got the answer from 1 gram of lunar soil given by the United States.
Moon landing conspiracy theory
There has been no debate in astronomical circles , but the so-called folk conspiracy theorists discuss the most intensely.
In the view of conspiracy theorists, does not have on the moon. First of all, in the era , although the United States' technology was leading the world, it still could not meet the conditions for lunar landing.
U.S. moon landing is questioned
The evidence is that in , a long time after the moon landing plan, , no other country has been able to land on the moon.
At that time, it was still in the preliminary stage of of the development of human space industry. Manned space flight was a very fine project and took more time to polish it.
Due to the need for the US-Soviet space battle, the United States had to stage such a farce , using the most realistic screen effect to achieve the goal of confusing the whole world, so that it can have a more say internationally.
In fact, this is easy to refute, because before the United States, Soviet Union had technology to send dogs into space .
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Especially in the environment of aerospace competition, it seems reasonable that the United States wants to to take the lead in and rashly launches the manned moon landing plan.
I have to say that the US luck is also quite good, and the manned moon landing plan is going smoothly .
And in that era, the Soviet Union had actually already had the technical conditions for manned moon landing . Why didn’t the Soviet Union become the second person to land on the moon?
The United States successfully landed the moon
After The collapse of the Soviet Union , a document revealed the truth. In fact, manned landing on the moon is a huge task, and requires hundreds of billions of dollars in funds.
At that time, the Soviet Union happened to be in the political crisis . Even if a draft of manned space flight was launched, it was not realized.
Then why did no one land on the moon for a long time later, land on the moon?
In fact, the most critical reason is the technical reason. To this day, only China, the United States, and Russia have the technology to land on the moon. Other countries are still in the stage of technological development.
China already has lunar landing technology
Secondly, the funds required to be used for lunar landing are so huge that the US subsequent lunar landing plan has to be stopped in the case of the national fiscal deficit.
believes that there are not many countries that can withdraw this funds from the national fiscal .
Finally, humans’ manned space moon landing plan is still in its initial stages, and the benefits brought by , , are far from keeping up with the previous investment.
Instead of sending these funds to individuals to the moon, it is better to consider how to develop domestic industry . Only when the country develops well can more funds be used in the exploration of aerospace industry in the future.
Manned moon landing costs huge
This is also the reason why China and Russia have no plans to implement even if they have technology.
soil conspiracy theory
After the manned landing on the moon from Apollo 11, the United States has brought back 382 kilograms of lunar soil from the moon and distributed it all over the world, showing its style of a great power.
conspiracy theorists are making a big fuss about and , saying that this is not the soil brought back from the moon, but is a special soil made of lunar meteorite .
The United States distributes these soils to countries around the world, which proves that the United States has is guilty and provides evidence to the world.
lunar soil rock retrieved by the United States
1972, Sino-US relations went towards normalization of . In order to show their sincerity, the United States gave China 1 gram of lunar soil as a gift.
I have to say that the United States is really picky. The soil weighing hundreds of kilograms is only given 1 gram.
It is also obvious that the United States does not want China to research too many things that are valuable to in the soil. Although the amount of
is not large, it is an "baby" for China. At that time, scientists divided this gram of soil into two halves, half for collection and half for research.
Everything on the moon is very precious
Relying on this 0.5 grams of lunar soil , scientists have also obtained considerable research results and have written 14 papers.
According to the research on this 1 gram of soil, the future development of aerospace industry in my country has basically been concluded. It can be said that the value generated by 1 gram of soil is far greater than its own weight .
So, will these so-called lunar soil be made of meteorite ?
Chinese scientists also studied with this question at that time. The results showed that soils actually came from the moon .
lunar soil does come from the moon
Because the element content of lunar soil is very unique, it contains a variety of metal element . The meteorites outside the sky have undergone long-term changes in the universe and rush into the earth to react with the atmosphere. The properties of the elements are completely different.
In terms of obtaining lunar soil, the probe launched by the Soviet Union in 1970 was also successfully retrieved. After comparing the soil information provided by the United States, there is no difference between the two.
Another thing is that the first meteorite from the moon on Earth was discovered in 1980, and the soil obtained by the United States was earlier.
Soil on the moon
Various reasons indicate that the United States' manned moon landing is not fake.
footprints disappeared?
Since the historical event of manned moon landing in the United States is true, has the human "a small step" disappeared on the moon?
After all, humans have successively launched so many detectors from the earth to the moon, which may have a certain impact on the "footprints".
There is actually no need to worry about this. Although moon is smaller than the earth, but its surface area is one-tenth of that of the earth , which is equivalent to the area of four Chinese territory.
The first footprint of human beings on the moon
If you want to accurately land within such a large range near an footprint , it is tantamount to looking for a needle in a haystack.
, and the region explored by each country will have a mark. As long as it is not targeted, other countries will basically not go to the areas explored by other countries.
Because it has been explored, what is the value of by ?
From a theoretical perspective, humans can save 00 years or even longer, because there is no wind on the moon eroding .
only covers footprint in the process of the moon's own evolution, but this will take a long time.
There is no wind erosion on the moon
Because the matter on the surface of the moon is constantly subjected to high temperature solar radiation , the material on the surface has become dusty. When Armstrong stepped on it, it was like stepping on the soft soil , and the mark left was still very clear.
my country's Chang'e-2 successfully completed the mission of orbiting the moon for a week, bringing back precious images of the moon's surface to my country. There are Armstrong's footprints in
, as well as many space probe landing and working descendants launched by humans.
strongly proves that the authenticity of Armstrong landing on the moon .
Chang'e-2 orbits the moon
Why there are no stars
In addition, the pictures sent back from the United States to the moon also caused widespread controversy over , because there is no stars in the photo, and only has a huge shadow of the earth.
According to principles, you should be able to obtain more clearer star photos, which has become the "strong evidence" of many people "anti-counterfeiting" to "cryptomatic" .
But the fact is exactly the opposite. It is precisely because there is no atmosphere that the image will not capture stars.
cannot see stars on the moon
Atmosphere has a scattered optical effect when people observe stars, allowing people to observe stars in the sky with their naked eyes.
The moon is directly exposed to the sun, and is the overexposed in taking pictures. Compared with stars, the sun's light is so dazzling that people cannot take good photos of the stars.
So in many movies about space, the background behind spacecraft is portrayed as dark. It is not that the director has no common sense, but that for , it simulates the normal human shooting environment of , giving the audience the most real experience.
The spacecraft is dark behind it
As the saying goes, science has no borders, all human explorations are committed to the better development of mankind. Everyone cannot wear tinted glasses to look at history and facts.
