If you compare a person with a computer, what interesting things will you find?
First of all, you have to admire the powerful computing power of computers. The human brain is obviously at a disadvantage.
What’s interesting is that although the computing power of the human brain is not as good as that of computers, we can easily identify the little red who is running, the little red who is studying under the desk lamp, and the little red who is sleeping with the lights off, all of them are little reds.
This is not an easy thing for computers to do.
Then, does anyone want to exclaim: This is impossible, right?
But this is indeed the case. Because of this, human beings can boast of their status as highly intelligent creatures.
Otherwise, computers would have dominated the earth long ago, and there would be nothing left for us humans.
What is the problem with ?
A very important point is that the computer cannot think like us ordinary humans. It will think of "Xiao Hong running", "Xiao Hong studying under the desk lamp", "Xiao Hong sleeping with the lights off" and "Xiao Hong". ” are four different things.
And we naturally know that these are "little reds" in different states.
The key to what we take for granted and what is difficult for computers to understand is that computers cannot generate "wisdom" and think. The "thinking" of is essentially programming, that is, a human-designed "algorithm" is given to it.
The thinking logic of is algorithmic logic, and the answers obtained are also related to the algorithm, subject to conditional restrictions. The shortcoming is that it cannot produce any correlation other than the algorithm.
Simply put, means that you input known data into it, and it can only evolve results within the algorithm.
If you have any new ideas, you can only give it a new algorithm to correlate, otherwise it will be like what my children often say: "I don't even understand what you are talking about."
For computers, After years of development, it has obvious advantages. It has massive data, advanced computing power, and complete algorithms, but it still cannot form "wisdom."
"Wisdom" is the most obvious sign that distinguishes humans from other species. So, as humans of the same species, do we often feel that we are "less intelligent than others"?
Many times, I am also thinking about how to make myself more "smart" so that I can be more controllable when facing some things in daily life, instead of relying solely on luck to survive.
makes life more controllable is the truest thought in my heart.
Can such a thing be possible? After some exploration, I thought this could be done.
Logically, this is how I understand it. first has data, and the data is combined into information. Information is filtered, summarized, and summarized to form knowledge. Finally, knowledge precipitates into wisdom through continuous practice.
You can say that others are educated and knowledgeable, but if it is worthy of using the word "wisdom", it must be someone you think is very powerful.
According to the previous summary, knowledge has four functions, namely description, explanation, prediction and control. We first understand and describe the appearance of something, then further explore and explain its causes, predict its next development, and finally give methods to control its development direction.
There is a saying that if the language cannot be touched, thoughts cannot be reached.
What this sentence says is that in it is difficult for you to imagine nothingness out of thin air. It also expresses the meaning that it is difficult to empathize with others unless you have similar experiences yourself.
So if you can’t even describe the appearance of things, there are too few known conditions, too many unknown factors, and the chain of suspicion is too long, the most direct way at this time is to choose not to do it.
This is like the two games of "chess" and "multiplayer poker":
The rules of "chess" are fixed. "Rooks" can only go straight, "horses" can only move in the Japanese square, and "pawns" can only move once. There is only one grid, which seems very complicated, but these are "controllable factors" and known conditions. As long as you have enough computing power, you can always find the optimal move.
But "multiplayer poker" does not work. The cards in each person's hand are random, and the fairness of the game itself is very poor. At this time, in order to achieve the final victory, everyone will play their own cards. Show your magical powers. For example, someone may bluff and pretend to be a good hand despite having a bad hand, or do the opposite.
In fact, the strategy of people who can play cards is in this direction: reduces the randomness of luck and increases the certainty of "controllable factors".
These are the last two awesome functions of knowledge: "prediction" and "control" .
Will you find that "chess" is essentially the ideal life we expect, while "multiplayer poker" is our real life.
So as I said just now, isn’t it a bit embarrassing to face our real life by lying down like “choosing not to do it”?
Of course, this is not my original intention. What I mean is that you must learn to face failure calmly, because there is no "universal formula". Of course, I also like to have a powerful "algorithm" that can solve all problems. The key is that there is no.
If you are very vague about something, for example, you heard from a friend that opening a milk tea shop is very profitable, but you have no entrepreneurial experience, do not understand marketing, cost control, and have limited funds on hand, there are too many unknown factors, and you need to learn Your ability is very poor. If you jump in when your head is hot at this time, "losing money" will be a high probability event.
Time and energy, coupled with the high monetary cost of opening a store now, this choice may make you donate the savings you have saved for several years in vain. The price is too high.
If you can spend these investments on a project that is "controllable" to you, then the results will be different. Of course, this is if.
Therefore, if you don’t do it at this time, it may be because it is unnecessary, or because your basic information is too little. You need to spend more time to understand this new thing and eliminate some uncontrollable factors. .
So, how do you make things more and more controllable?
The idea is, I predicted your prediction, and your behavior goes in the direction I predicted.
There is a very interesting method, let’s call it: "conditional qualification method" .
The logic of "Conditional Limitation Method" is that the algorithm only holds true within limited conditions, that is, things will appear in a regular form under limited conditions, so that we can get the results we want.
For example, salespeople in shopping malls often use this method to improve their sales closing rate.
If your eyes stay on the summer sandals rack for a long time, the salesperson will make a basic judgment based on your fashion level, age, and spending power, and then selectively "choose one".
For example, she will say: This is our new model launched in the summer. It focuses on youthful and beautiful lines. It is sold out. The most popular colors are crescent white and charming purple. I think your feet are similar to mine. There are sizes 36 here, sit down and try them out!
Of course, these sales terms will change according to different people, but the idea is to use conditional restrictions to increase the closing rate. After all, many people may just have needs, but do not have a clear choice.
At this time, he needs the push of others to make the decision he thinks is right.
The "algorithm" derived from knowledge has completed the advanced functions of prediction and control within limited conditions.
