[Editor's note] This article is authorized by the author Mu Zhino. "Qin'an Strategy" is exclusively and original published on the Toutiao platform. It is reprinted from the public account "Zhihu Zheye Ji". There are many exciting contents, welcome to pay attention.
Jeffrey Sachs, chairman of the Lancet COVID-19 Committee, said: The new coronavirus does not have any natural source. To be more precise, it was produced in an accident in a US biotechnology laboratory.
Regarding this point of view, we can only listen. If we are not sure, we can only act, not say.
He made this statement at a meeting of the think tank GATE Center in Spain and hinted that he is involved in the confidential think tank because he chairs the new crown committee of the prestigious medical journal "The Lancet ".
Jeffrey Sachs and Neil Harrison (Columbia University) wrote an article in "The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences" in May The article suggested that the new coronavirus was created in a laboratory. The paper, written by Sacks and Harrison, argued that U.S. universities and federal agencies should be more transparent about the matter, while pointing to the fact that there was insufficient evidence.
The academic noted that while "we are not sure" whether this is the case, there is "substantial evidence" pointing to this and "this should be investigated." Sachs complained, however, that the claim "has not been investigated in the United States or elsewhere."
Sachs and Harrison suggested that virus databases, biological sequences, virus sequences, and email correspondence and notebooks from labs could be used to help understand the origins of the pandemic. However, nothing in these materials has been subject to the "unrestricted, objective, scientific and transparent scrutiny" they claim. As an indicator that the new coronavirus originated in the laboratory, the authors raised the fact that the eight amino acid sequence of a key part of the virus's spike protein is similar to the amino acid sequence found in human respiratory tract cells.
Sachs is not actually the first person to claim that deadly viruses do not occur naturally.
The most famous one is Nobel Prize winner and French virologist Luc Montagnier (Luc Montagnier), who publicly opposes mass vaccination. He pointed out based on the facts: Vaccination with the new coronavirus vaccine not only cannot prevent new coronavirus pneumonia (Covid-19), but will increase the number of virus infections, aggravate disease symptoms, increase mortality, thereby worsening the new coronavirus epidemic. Montagna has long concluded that the new coronavirus is artificially created.
Before his death on February 8, 2022, Professor Luc Montagnier put an end to the assertion that Covid-19 evolved naturally by showing that Covid-19 is extremely equivalent to HIV. The image below (omitted) shows the 275 nucleotide region of Covid-19, with 200 nucleotides from HIV/SIV (simian immune virus). Remember, there are 61 codons and specify 20 amino acids.
British media published in March this year ( "BREAKING: Official Biochemical and Statistical Evidence 100% confirms Moderna created Covid-19", The Expose, March 3, 2022. ) "BREAKING: Official Biochemical and Statistical Evidence 100% confirms Moderna created Covid-19" The article "100% Confirms that Modona Company Created the New Coronavirus" supports the paper published by Luc Montagna many times that the new coronavirus was artificially created in the laboratory, and the AIDS protein HIV is embedded in the virus.
I said that all the above things are not to judge the traceability of the virus, but to provide everyone with a different perspective. Moreover, these arguments and reports are not China’s model of deducing Fort Detrick , but professionals from abroad. Research can at least be used as circumstantial evidence. It is not a "conspiracy theory" as Liang Wendao said.
In fact, we at WJB have also made efforts. The referendum at Fort Detrick was intended to promote it. Unfortunately, it did not take off due to the suppression of Western public opinion.
What I want to say to everyone is:
Even the most authoritative medical institutions don’t know where this virus came from.
Even Biden ’s 90-day intelligence survey has not produced results. None of us can say what the new coronavirus is.
This also means one thing:
Some things need not be said, and some work must be done.
Because of two different origins: nature and laboratory, and two different endings: intentional and accidental, the responses required are completely different, and the bottom-line thinking required is different.
In this regard, I would like to say three points.
- There are many things that ordinary people know too little about, and it is inconvenient to know them. What should be known to you will be known to you.
- There are also some things that each country cannot control on its own, especially hostile ones. environment
- The reason why we don’t mention it much is because we have concerns, because there are many things that we don’t have a real answer for, and we will never have a real answer. It is useless to mention it, and the strength is not as good as
In fact, I’m sorry to say that if.
We currently cannot reach the level of virus biotechnology in the United States and can only catch up.
It's a good thing. We are quite powerful now. Even if the West wants to do something, it still needs to find some reason. It was not necessary when it slaughtered Indians or even made up the Mayans to go to Mars. Those who look for reasons are still afraid.
I think this is the case now. There is no need to discuss conspiracy theories with righteous indignation. What is important is to think about a few bottom-line issues.
First , if it is a laboratory product as studied by Jeffrey Sachs, what does it mean?
This may mean that man-made viruses are different from nature, and there will be no natural laws like the past "three years of pandemic". What we may be facing is a huge human crisis, and mankind will be faced with it again and again in the next few decades. Repeated infections and worsening health lead to the death of a large number of people. This requires Chinese scientists to jointly tackle key problems and find ways to restrain themselves scientifically. This is the only way out, and it may also be a stroke of change in the destiny of mankind. After all, we do not need medical treatments like , Pfizer, or Moderna. Interest groups profit from this.
means that all our development strategies require a second plan.
Second , what is the difference between accidental leakage in the laboratory and intentional leakage?
Don’t think that accidental leaks are impossible. In fact, laboratory viruses have leaked in several major countries on the planet, but everyone doesn’t know about it. It’s not just the United States, it’s the same for us, but nothing happened. The consequences of the accidental leakage of
may be better, which shows that the United States does not have strong control over viruses. However, if it is intentional, then the response we have to do is not what it is now, but a biological war and a genocide war.
I hope that the AQ department will investigate every epidemic situation in the country. There is no harm in it. There will be more in the future.
Third , how does the United States view this crisis?
Looking at the mess in the entire United States at present, what I see is more of a backlash like the Russia-Ukraine war. If no one is immune, then there will be It is possible to continue cooperation, but the cost is very high.
Most of the more than 15 million people who have died so far are the elderly and those with underlying diseases. The proportion of ethnic minorities in the United States is also very high, which has put huge pressure on the U.S. finances. It has no choice but to release water. In order to save the economy, it has to choose to ignore the virus. Forced propaganda that the pandemic is over.
Monkeypox is more worthy of vigilance than the new crown , because it means that the current decision-making of the United States insists that the epidemic is beneficial to its national interests, otherwise it will not always do what others do.
When the top wealthy people can take antibody serum, take Pfizer paxlovid for $529 a course, and have complete medical insurance, the damage of the new coronavirus is actually greatly reduced, but how many such people are there?
In fact, whatever the United States does, we will most likely not be wrong if we do the opposite.
Fourth , how should we treat this pandemic
I think we may not have a final conclusion yet, because it is really difficult to figure out.
If you look back at the scientific research in 2020, 2021 or even this year, including what top people said, you will find that:
is basically being slapped in the face again and again.
Whether it’s a vaccine, a trend, whatever.
Of course, I won’t go into details here. One thing we need to be clear about is that this country is making every effort to protect everyone in this nation. Although there are many things that are not done perfectly, this heart is sincere and valuable. of.
Many things, looking back, are not so romantic, but in fact they are tragic.
Okay, that’s all. There are many issues with . There is no need to ask or argue too much, but there is no need to make a conclusion now about . What ordinary people need to do is to be fully prepared mentally and physically and materially. , the spirit is strong enough, so that they will not collapse after being detained for 50 days like in Shanghai.
As for the national dimension, solidly improving our scientific and technological level is the only key to solving the current problem, because no matter how perfect the organizational system and economic policy is, it will be on the verge of collapse under this endless impact. one day.
