|Many doctors persuaded not to get vaccinated, just to be exempted from liability, and there is no scientific basis for
I believe everyone has seen that relaxation is the general trend. In the latest manuscript of the National Society, " dynamically clear " is no longer mentioned. Vice President Sun also set the tone for the next work, namely "take small steps without stopping." Local governments have also adjusted their policies intensively. For example, Beijing announced today that from next week, we will no longer check the 48-hour nucleic acid certificate by bus and subway.
However, many people are worried about "letting go", which is because there are elderly relatives at home who have not received the vaccine . In fact, the current three-dose vaccination rate for elderly people in China is not high, which is also one of the factors that hinder the full liberalization.
My background also received a large number of messages telling me that my relatives are cancer patients or people with severe underlying diseases, and the doctors told them not to get vaccinated. I give priority to replying to these messages and tell them clearly that as long as is not in the event of an attack, I can get vaccinated. Not only can I get vaccinated, but I should also get vaccinated if I have underlying diseases.
also had a comment claiming to be a doctor's refutation, "You said that those with serious underlying diseases can still get vaccinated. Has my medical treatment been in vain?"
If there is indeed a doctor who believes that those with serious underlying diseases cannot get vaccinated, then I can only say with regret that your medical treatment has indeed been in vain.
The absolute taboo for vaccination is very rare, and it is not worth worrying about
without saying much, just gossip. The State Council Prevention and Control Group issued the "Notice on Issuing the Work Plan for Strengthening the Vaccination of the New Coronavirus in the Elderly" on November 29, which clearly introduces the "contraindications" that may be involved in vaccination. I will introduce it as follows:
There are 4 items listed here, which can actually be divided into two categories. The first category refers to those who have had severe allergic reactions. The latter three categories all refer to those with serious underlying diseases that are onset or have extremely poor condition.
is very easy to understand. If you are onset of illness and feel uncomfortable, so of course you should take some relief first. When the condition stabilizes, you can actually get vaccinated again. In addition to the two situations of
, no matter what strange statements you hear, don’t believe it.
Focus on the first category, "Severe allergic reactions occurred during vaccination, such as allergic shock and laryngeal edema." The expression in this place actually leaves a certain amount of space. A better statement should be "severe allergic reactions occurred during vaccination in the past."
So, someone may ask, how do I know if the elderly at home will have severe allergic reactions when they get vaccinated?
First of all, we need to talk about a basic concept here, that is, absolute zero risk does not exist, but if the probability is very low and the returns are very large, then it is not worth worrying.
According to data in May this year, the cumulative number of new crown vaccine was vaccinated at that time, and the incidence of allergic reactions was 33/1 million doses, which was lower than the reported level of other routine vaccinations in the country. It should be noted that the "accidental rate of allergic reactions" is counted here, not a serious allergic reaction. There were 366 cases of severe allergic reactions such as allergic shock at that time. If divided by 3.38 billion doses, the probability was so low that it could not be said.
inactivated vaccine mainly contains micrograms of viral antigen or recombinant protein, as well as other components such as aluminum hydroxide adjuvants and excipients. What ingredient causes allergies? One speculation is that the aluminum agent in it is an allergen that may stimulate a type I hypersensitivity reaction, or an inducing factor that causes an allergic reaction.
Of course, in reality, there are people who are afraid of numbers when they see numbers (a bug in the human brain in the information society, which was explained yesterday’s article) will say, do you think there are still 366 cases? I'm going to say this. In fact, many foods and substances in life can cause allergic reactions, including serious allergic reactions. If you really want to report and count as strictly as a vaccine, the number and probability will definitely be much higher than that of the vaccine, and I don't know how many times higher it is.
After reading these, you will know that the first "taboo certificate" pointed out in the State Council's prevention and control team is actually very low and is not worth worrying about. Of course, whether it is scientific and rigorous or realistic guidance, it is appropriate to list it.Even if such a low probability really occurs in reality, timely intervention is required.
Vaccination will not cause illness
Some people are also worried, will the vaccine cause certain diseases in the human body? For a long time, there were indeed these rumors on the Internet.
can actually be analyzed from the components of the vaccine. If you are vaccinated, you will not get sick. The content of various substances in the vaccine is very low and must comply with relevant regulations and cannot lead to diseases in itself.
As for the effective component in the vaccine - trace amounts of recombinant protein, it can be understood as a "dead virus" (virus corpse). If you change it, think about it. If you are infected with the new coronavirus, it is a "live virus". If you are worried about getting sick with a dead virus, then isn't the "live virus" afraid of death?
In fact, after these "dead viruses" enter the human body, their main function is to stimulate the human body to produce immune memory. Because they are no longer active, they will not produce infection symptoms like live viruses and will not cause diseases.
In short, whether from the analysis of the components of the vaccine or the monitoring situation, domestic inactivated vaccines are very safe, and the risk of vaccination is extremely low, especially for elderly people with underlying diseases. Because there is still a certain mortality rate after infection with , the benefits of vaccination will far outweigh the risks.
By the way, if you can get four shots (using nasal vaccine as a supplement, or taking Mrna vaccine as a supplement), it will have better effects than three shots to prevent severe illness and death.
Doctors don’t let you get the shot, maybe it’s for “less trouble”
Let’s go back to the last question: Since there are not so many messy taboos for vaccination, why do front-line vaccination doctors often persuade vaccinators to withdraw? The answer is actually very simple: some are really not understood, and a lot of times it is for the purpose of exemption from liability.
Because the benefits of vaccination are yours, but if there is an abnormal reaction (including real adverse reactions and coincidental symptoms), some people will make trouble. If you want to sue him, he will have a more headache.
How conservative is the doctor? My family once went to get vaccinated, but after taking the toothache the day before yesterday, I was persuaded to give up and said I would come back a few days ago. It's simply ridiculous.
So, unless the doctor is selfless and completely considers you, many things are really "It is better to have less than more things, and it is not my business if you get infected in the future."
However, if you understand the truth, you should think like this: the benefits of getting vaccinated are my own, and I should believe in science and rationality. As long as I and my relatives in my family do not have a severe allergic reaction (the probability is very low), and are in the onset of an underlying disease, you can get vaccinated.
If the doctor wants to stop him, take out the State Council documents and show him that he is willing to take risks (there is a serious abnormal reaction, and there is a legal compensation mechanism).
Of course, I hope that the country can explore better mechanisms (including mediation and compensation mechanisms, which is quite complicated). On the one hand, we should not make things difficult for doctors, and not let vaccinators have worries.
Previous articles:
·How to answer the question "The harm of the new coronavirus" positively?
·How to answer the question "Let go and die of 1 million"?
·China is preparing for a "soft landing", but it is not yet a young man who has let go of
·Fuskang's escape, what are he afraid of?
·Is there a "middle route" for epidemic prevention? Sample
·Seriously evaluate What is the level of 's poem
·"When you are taken away in kimono", the root cause lies in the "national hatred" that has nowhere to be vented
·"The sequelae of the new crown", is it really scary?
· Liang Jianzhang was banned, and technical discussions "cleared"
· Forced home disinfection, is there really a basis?
· Have all the rumors at the source of the new crown been the result?
· "Fake salt" does not exist at all
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-