low-level thinking originated from the term "first principle". The so-called "first principle" can be said to be both the principle of physics and the principle of philosophy and the principle of , but it ultimately is a way of thinking.
Overall, people have now begun to realize that "if there is no certain conceptual framework, individual observations will remain largely isolated, and their meanings are often mysterious or even useless." It is a compulsory homework for psychology to think about .
For example, General psychology Knowledge tells us that matter determines the spirit, and brain structure determines brain function; however, if theoretical thinking tells us that the reverse order, that is, the possibility that function precedes structure, is also extremely great, will this prompt research to enter a new direction? Dive head-on into cognitive neuroscience experiments, and ignore cognitive science philosophy has gone through three generations of theory changes, and even does not even think about possible paths of future development, which makes our research mostly repeat and verify others, and is extremely lacking in innovation. The same is true for the development of
Artificial intelligence . I only know how to use existing software platforms and programs to do " coder ", and not care about the lowest level of "0, 1" binary logic. This first principle of intelligent science will naturally make us only a small follower in the field of artificial intelligence, only doing improvements, and no innovation ability.
When Western Psychological Science was introduced to China, it has not been able to integrate well with Chinese culture and Chinese bloodlines. Therefore, the current psychological knowledge is still lacking "local" power . We may be able to draw local strength from Chinese Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism About Mentality Hymnity Philosophical thinking For example, build a set of Based on morality Confucian mindfulness system psychology theory .
Of course, what is more worthy of Chinese psychology's serious consideration is that the contemporary exhibition of Marxist philosophy in the theory of psychology is almost implicitly absent in China.
Are we too chasing without critical criticism? I hope that psychology researchers can calm down and jump out of the "Lushan local" from time to time to familiarize themselves with and grasp the underlying logic and underlying framework so as to recognize the "Lushan Comprehensive Project", and continuously make innovative psychological research results .
Zhang Jianxin ( Researcher and doctoral supervisor of the Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
#Telegraph Creation Challenge#
#Psychological Commonsense in Interpersonal Communication#
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-