An anti-coronavirus drug called Pfizer Paxlovid became popular after the country approved its introduction. It was not because of the drug itself, but because of the instigation of some big Vs and many people who did not know the truth followed the trend and made noise.

An anti-coronavirus drug called Pfizer Paxlovid became popular after the country approved its introduction. It was not because of the drug itself, but because of the instigation of some big Vs and the following and clamoring of many people who did not know the truth.

In a short period of time, Pfizer COVID-19 drug Paxlovid was labeled by some people as "traitor of Chinese medicine", "traitor drug", "dark operation of capital interest groups" and other political labels. What's more, a certain big V actually elevated this drug to the level of "biological warfare" and " economic warfare ". The extent of his imagination is really staggering. As if this was not enough, these big V's also insulted Dr. Zhang Wenhong, who had been fighting on the front line of epidemic prevention, as a spokesperson for Pfizer, and attacked him as "Internet celebrity doctor Pfizer Zhang." For a time, the heroic doctor in the eyes of the people was treated as if he had become a representative of evil.

As an ordinary citizen, I don’t want to blindly follow the trend. I just want to calm down and analyze it carefully to see if the views of the big V’s attacking this drug are valid? Are they politically aware and mentally strong, or do they have fragile glass hearts? Or is it for some other purpose?

Big V’s point of view 1: How can the American miracle drug that cannot save millions of souls have the confidence to sell it to China?

This question sounds very reasonable at first glance. Yes, if it is so good and effective, why do so many people die in the United States? If this question is established, then the conspiracy theory will also be established.

But facts speak louder than words, we might as well look at a set of objective data display.

1) Pfizer Paxlovid is an oral antiviral drug that received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on December 22, 2021. It is mainly used in high-risk groups to treat patients with mild to moderate new coronavirus infection and reduce the rate of severe illness;

2) As of December 2022, the cumulative number of new coronavirus cases recorded in the United States is 100 million. Among them, as of December 22, 2021, before Pfizer Paxlovid was launched, the cumulative number of new crown cases recorded in the United States has exceeded 50 million. As of February 2022, before Pfizer Paxlovid was widely used, the cumulative number of cases had reached 80 million;

3) the United States had recorded more than 1.08 million deaths from COVID-19. Among them, as of the time of launch on December 22, 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recorded 800,000 new crown-related deaths. In other words, 175% of COVID-19 deaths in the United States occurred before Pfizer Paxlovid was launched;

4) Hong Kong, China, clinically used Pfizer Paxlovid during the fifth wave of the epidemic and achieved positive results, and has accelerated the promotion of Pfizer Paxlovid.

Big V’s second opinion: Is Pfizer’s entry driven by interest groups controlled by capital? It is recommended that internet celebrity experts in the medical field be included in the national anti-corruption system!

This problem is very big and scary. Moreover, it reveals aversion to capital manipulation, hatred of corruption, and concern for the country and the people. The starting point is worthy of recognition and praise.

But I want to ask, looking at domestic and foreign countries, is there any drug that does not have capital control behind it? Which capital does not have relevant interest groups and interest chains? On this basis, when capital interest groups develop drugs, is it for charity rather than to make money? Take the nucleic acid companies during the lockdown period as an example. If they didn't make a lot of money, would they be competing to go public later?

Therefore, instead of worrying about whether the capital behind it is operating in secret, it is better to study and analyze it carefully to see whether the drugs launched by these capitals really meet the needs of the people, and whether they are really guaranteed for physical health and life safety? What's more, as Pfizer China's agent, " China Pharmaceuticals " is still a state-owned holding company?

Of course, I firmly support the suggestion that Internet celebrity experts in the medical field be included in the anti-corruption system. But at the same time, I believe that as an expert within a state-owned holding company and system, I am within the anti-corruption system.

3. Why can a foreign imported drug be included in China’s medical insurance?

Regarding this issue, it is indeed a bit dumbfounding. I think all netizens who have watched " I am not the god of medicine " understand that there are many imported drugs now entering the medical insurance. This should be a highly responsible manifestation of the country listening to the people's voice, paying attention to the people's needs, and satisfying the people's desire for healthy survival. Why is it now an excuse for attack?

As for the question of why it was included in the medical insurance so quickly, I would like to ask, is there any disease that has a wider impact than the new crown and is more concerned by the people? Although it will not be life-threatening for the vast majority of people, isn't it urgently needed for the elderly and people with underlying diseases? Is it wrong to speed up the inclusion of special services in medical insurance so that ordinary people can afford it? Do we have to ignore the life and death of the people and conduct repeated investigations for several years to prove our innocence?

In fact, it is hard not to think that it is false to attack a drug and the interest groups behind it, but it is true to use this as an excuse to attack the national epidemic prevention policy, right? , I'm afraid this is the real ulterior motive, and is it really controlled by some interest groups?

Finally, I also want to ask a question? Does it mean that as long as it is from the United States, we must oppose it and boycott it?

First of all, I personally do not like the United States. I also think that the United States is like a rogue country that bullies the weak and interferes in the internal affairs of other countries. I especially believe that it is determined to destroy me. But this does not prevent me from recognizing its status as the number one power. We must face the reality that it is still far behind it in many fields, including , biomedicine, and other fields.

As far as biomedicine is concerned, is one of the top 10 medical device companies in the world! The United States alone has 6 companies, while China has none. Is it okay not to admit the gap? Is it okay not to study? Although we have invested a huge amount of money in the development of new coronavirus drugs, before developing them, we first introduce drugs that have been proven to be effective to ensure that the harm of the new coronavirus to high-risk groups is minimized. What crime is there?

acknowledges the strength of the enemy, faces up to the existing gaps, and strives to learn from the enemy’s advanced experience, all in order to ultimately achieve overtake. Isn’t this difficult to understand? The Manchus still know that "learn the skills of the barbarians to control the barbarians". Today, some Chinese people are blindly resisting and labeling a new coronavirus drug with many political labels. Is it a sign of high political awareness, a strong heart, or a fragile glass heart? Or is there some other ulterior purpose?