The answer is not certain, it depends on the specific content of the signed contract between the work and the platform. Everyone should always remember that returns and efforts are proportional.
For example, the author may have compared many companies at that time, and felt that the company gave more benefits than other companies, so he decisively signed a contract with this platform, and he may not pay much attention to the copyright ownership of the work. The more profit you give, it is definitely because the platform thinks that the work has potential. If you want to invest more and make high returns, the platform's investment will cost a certain amount of money and energy. Correspondingly, the work is likely to sign a contract to obtain the full copyright of the work. In this way, although the author can get a higher return in a short time, it is not cost-effective in the long run. If the later market feedback of the book is really good, all the benefits of subsequent publications, film and television adaptations, copyright derivatives, etc. have nothing to do with the author.
We previously published a novel, and later we helped the author to recommend film and television, which was spotted by a large film and television company and adapted film and television. The income from this part was at least one million. This is some potential impact.
If you pay more attention to copyright at the beginning and have a detailed understanding of the contract signed, the work is only partially copyrighted, such as online publishing, and the rights to be handed over to the platform, then the author still owns the copyright of the work, which will not have much impact on subsequent publication or copyright derivatives.
Therefore, when the author and teacher sign the contract, they must pay more attention to these issues. Copyright ownership issues are crucial.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-