Three years ago, Wuhan resolutely closed down the city, and the whole country was filled with the voice of "Come on Wuhan!" But now this situation is invisible.
Three years later, another large-scale lockdown, and what we hear is no longer "XX, come on!" but resentment, anxiety, helplessness and even anger.
The news of "breaking the card", "demolting the fence", and "blocking" spread across the country, indicating that our epidemic prevention policies and epidemic prevention methods have greatly differentiated in the public's cognitive level of the entire society. And this disagreement seems to be intensifying. If it is not well guided and effectively resolved, the outbreak of this contradiction will be far greater than the epidemic itself.
Whether it is "sealing" or "silence", or what has appeared now, it is nothing wrong with it. Instead, these measures are very important to block and contain the virus. Communication plays a decisive role. But the cost is too high, and it will only get bigger and bigger.
The reason why Wuhan's lockdown was highly praised is largely because people subconsciously believe that the epidemic is necessary and can be "quick and quick" and need to mobilize the whole country to fight against the annihilation battle. Therefore, when Wuhan achieved a decisive victory in the fight against the epidemic, people couldn't help but celebrate.
But in the next three years, when the Wuhan model became the classic and mainstream of the fight against the epidemic, everything began to change. Faced with the repeated epidemic, the idea of "doing all your strength" is becoming increasingly unrealistic, but in the past three years we have not been prepared for a protracted war, but are busy with "blocking, blocking, blocking." Screening and constantly repeating and "adding code layer by layer".
However, due to the increasing scale of one-size-fits-all large-scale blockade, the spread of the virus has not been substantially curbed. In some places, a little relaxation will lead to virus transmission.
In fact, everyone knows that "quietness" is the best way to block the spread of the virus, but it is also the most costly method. At present, the country has the determination and strength to bear this price. "Life is first." ” "People-oriented" has always been the core principle that runs through the entire epidemic prevention process. For the health of the people, the Party and the country are willing to pay any price.
But if the price of "quieting" is implemented on everyone, the feelings will completely change over time. In this way, some public opinion will be ignored and "pay". How to balance the scale of "movement" and "quietness" and how to pay attention to the demands of some people who "can't afford to calm" become the key to the problem. The essence of this problem is how to correctly and wisely deal with "overall interests and local interests" and "individual interests and The imbalance and inadequacy between national interests.
allows those who should move and those who should move resolutely move, and those who should move resolutely quiet. This should be the direction of future epidemic prevention and control. This seems simple, but it is very difficult to operate. The key is to have very accurate and scientific standards for judging "movement" and "quietness".
In fact, the 20 articles issued by the state have clearly stipulated the standards of "movement" and "quietness". It is not surprising that local governments maintain the epidemic prevention attitude of "strictness is not as good as lenient".
