Today, I completed the first continuous broadcast in my life, which can be regarded as a small live broadcast. Lianmao and Baozi shared the "Details of the Rule of Law" by Teacher Luo Xiang .
It has been a few days since I finished reading this book. After reading
, I specially wrote a long article of 6,000 words, shared my understanding of this book in detail, and tried to learn to write a manuscript.
When I shared it live again today, I suddenly felt a lot of feelings I had never seen before.
is very similar to what I wrote before.
At first, I thought I was writing well, and then I posted it excitedly.
Go and see it in a few days. Alas, I can’t bear to look at it directly.
Is this really what I wrote?
all say that good articles are modified, but it is true that I will not deceive me.
We must always believe in the power of time precipitation.
This process also gave me a deeper understanding of how to read a book. I want to use this method in my future reading.
After reading a book, try to write a deep reading manuscript for the whole book immediately.
first write it. Don’t care too much about the quality, but the scope of the content. You should try to pass the entire content of a book and string it over and form your first complete impression and understanding of the book.
Then it is to remove precipitation.
should not be too long, three to five days, one week, and half a month.
to share in-depth again.
This time, I don’t want to be comprehensive, I just want to be more profound, and see what exactly touched me in this book.
After two times, the book was almost absorbed.
If you can share it live once, the kind that is completely out of the manuscript, it will be even more profound.
This also fits the famous Feynman learning method.
This time I focused on three points.
1, the relationship between law and morality. The book
says that law is the minimum requirement of morality. This sentence is also a very famous cognition.
As one of the three ancient major subjects (theology, medicine, and law), the emergence of law was to govern problems that arise in society. It is a scalpel, specially created for social problems.
However, the birth of this knife is very harsh because it has a punishment mechanism, which must have a certain backlash factor.
In order to avoid this "backlash" of the law, the formulation of legal provisions is very restrained, which is also the reason why law is the minimum requirement of morality.
Law is not to deal with all the problems that arise in society. It can only be to maintain the basic stability of social operation. More importantly, it requires moral mechanisms to restrict and restrict.
Because the moral mechanism is too focused on self-discipline, the law is needed to maintain the most basic bottom line.
Human cognition has limitations, and it lags behind the development of society.
Whether it is law or morality, they all have their own blind spots.
This is also the origin of many famous paradoxes.
For example, the book says, " tram problem ."
A madman tied 5 people to the track of the tram, and an out-of-control tram roared in. There was a pull rod in the middle of the two. If pulled down, the tram would drive to another track, and these 5 people would be spared from death.
Unfortunately.
was tied up by a madman on another track.
At this time, will you pull down the pull rod?
Teacher Luo Xiang gave the answer in the book, The right to life is supreme, it cannot be quantified, you cannot say righteously, 5>1, it is right to save 5 people, and the sacrifice of 1 person is valuable.
But many times, people's code of conduct is exactly in line with this so-called utilitarian principle.
Whether it is law or morality, it is ultimately people's perception of the behavior of this world. It is destined to be imperfect and imperfect, and it cannot give a perfect explanation of these paradoxes.
is also these imperfections, which allows us to truly understand this society.
Regret is the norm, and imperfection is actually perfect in another sense.
Only when you understand this can you begin to truly face the world and re-recognize our familiar, strange, real and illusory world.
2, program justice.
The famous " Simpson case " is so "famous" because this case fully reflects the necessity of procedural justice and also makes you understand what the law is.
Almost most people are "convinced" Simpson is the evil man who killed his wife, and there is a lot of evidence that also proves this.
plus Simpson himself is a notorious person.
People really hope that the law can judge this evil man and give justice to that poor woman.
Unfortunately, during the trial, there were several evidences that were flawed and could not match perfectly, which also led to partial missing of the evidence link.
According to legal procedures , Simpson was finally acquitted.
This caused a sensation at the time.
However, more than 90% of Americans agree with this judgment.
Isn’t the law for justice?
Why did such an unforgivable person be acquitted?
Can this little evidence flaw completely overturn the guilty conclusion?
Yes, that's true!
Procedural justice is to avoid the arrogance of power, and to avoid more unjust, false and wrong cases. Even if you know that this case is a "confirm" misjudgment, this is the only way.
Follow the meaning of procedural justice and is far greater than the absolute justice of a case.
It protects a program, a rule, and a mechanism that is of protection to everyone.
No one can attempt to exercise absolute justice through procedural justice of the law.
Only when you understand this can you have the most basic understanding of the law.
Law is not the Shangfang Sword we imagine, killing all the treacherous people in the world.
It is a rule.
This is why many people say that if the law is not prohibited, it can be done. Is this really the case with
?
of course not. There is no prohibition on the law and there are moral constraints.
3, eternal fairness and justice
Some people say that this world is gray, there is no absolute right or absolute mistake, it is just that the angle of the site is different.
I have always been very confident before.
until I finished reading this book.
I suddenly felt that I was really ignorant and realistic.
Teacher Luo Xiang said.
Although there are all kinds of imperfections in this world, that perfect circle must exist, and it will not exist just because we do not have the ability to do it.
We cannot stop believing it just because we can’t do it.
He firmly believes that this world has eternal fairness and justice, such as the circle that cannot be touched.
We must believe in the perfect existence in this world, and we must pursue it unswervingly. I'm really touched by
.
When I was young, I was full of passion and always wanted to change the world with my sword.
When I grew up, I found that this was not the world we imagined at all. It was not perfect at all. It even made people very helpless and helpless.
Entangled, confused, confused, confused, lost.
Then he chose to reconcile with this world, accepted everything with a smile, slowly got used to everything, began to ignore it, began to be cold-blooded, and began to stop struggling.
But.
in this book.
Teacher Luo Xiang told us that we can’t do this!
We must believe in this world, accepting unreasonableness does not mean that we will give up, we must stick to the light in our hearts, work hard to do what we think is right, and try our best to influence and change the world.
Rationality is not true maturity, ideals are!
RomanRoland says.
"There is only one kind of heroism in the world, that is, after realizing the truth of life, you still love life."
They believe that this world has real beauty, and all the beauty that can be worthy of their own efforts.
This book by Teacher Luo Xiang was very profound at first glance because he talked about a lot of deeper legal understanding, but after understanding it, this book still touched me a lot.
Teacher Luo Xiang is a very rational but idealistic person. He understands the rules of operating this world, but he also believes that this world has light.
This is a book that combines legal principles and life philosophy, and it is also a book that has greatly improved my understanding.
If you haven't read it, it is recommended that you read it.
