actual combat is the only criterion for testing equipment and combat concepts. No matter how weird Zhurihe in our country, it is still a daily exercise. Compared with the US military, which is better than finding people to fight all over the world? In fact, to a certain extent, my country's left-handed right-handed exercises are more effective. In fact, after the Americans’ tactical reforms, apart from the experience of several large-scale local wars, they mainly rely on domestic exercises and training. As for the experience accumulated in fighting Afghanistan, that is, some light infantry experience, it is of little significance to large-scale wars.
Modern warfare is different from previous wars. Modern warfare relies on modern weapons and scientific information. These are the power of modern warfare! The war is no longer the era of millet and rifle. The more large-scale wars, the more informationization is needed, and the more highly accurate modern weapons are needed. Some poor and backward countries cannot win the modern power even if they fight year after year. As for wars in countries of the same national strength, it depends on whose preparations are more normalized and who pays more attention to army building and military training.
China has not participated in wars or large-scale military conflicts in the past 40 years. Although my country has upgraded its equipment many times during this period, training and exercises have never slackened every year, but it lacks actual combat experience. It cannot be said that there is no chance of winning for the fighting army, but it must go through a difficult process of adaptation. Modern warfare is not only about the quality of soldiers, skills and tactics, and actual combat experience, but more importantly, the country's comprehensive strength, such as military scientific and technological capabilities, equipment modernization, and logistics support.
The US Marine Corps complained that the security war and counter-guerrilla warfare between Afghanistan and Iraq have been fought for a long time, and their old amphibious landing skills have declined, and they want to withdraw from Afghanistan to restore their professional skills. This is mainly because it is difficult to fight between big powers, and it is difficult to accumulate experience in adapting to this kind of regular war. This can be regarded as a lesson for the United States. If the experience of World War I is used to formulate World War II tactics, it will be dead. , Not to mention now. According to Apers, a retired American military expert who experienced the Korean War, the Chinese military is quite powerful and will not disappear after 40 years of fighting. Once our army enters a real war, these post-80s and post-90s soldiers will become qualified fighters.
And almost all the wars that the United States has participated in since World War II have been bullying, and it has to gather a vote of allies before and after, so slinging on small dishes like Iraq, , Grenada, and can really increase the fight against us. Experience? The result is obvious. From the perspective of confrontation between major powers, the United States has almost no relevant actual combat experience except for the "forgotten war." In this way, once we meet in the future, it may not be known who will die.
Although our country has not participated in actual combat in the past 40 years, after all, the comprehensive national strength and the level of military science and technology are here. In the face of , the Middle East and , countries that have been fighting for many years can be easily defeated. Is quite difficult. Although they are strong, the People's Liberation Army is not vegetarian and will not fear any opponents. There are many countries fighting every year, and there are many in the Middle East and Africa, but that is, the militiamen are shooting with ak dance steps, and even aiming is an extravagant hope. What is the point of more actual combat for such an army? (Text/mountain peak)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-