H-6, Chinese military fans have always wanted to see Chinese Air Force have a real strategic bomber . In the past two years, various official media have been hinting again and again that H-20 is approaching its first flight. Chinese military fans have gone from hope to disappointment again and again, but whenever news of the H-20 is about to fly for the first time, Chinese military fans will be willing to believe it, even if they know they are disappointed.
Recently, the world-renowned military website "1945" published an article titled "H-20: China's New Stealth Bomber Could Combine New B-21". The author believes that the H-20, as a new stealth bomber in China, combines the advantages of two American strategic bombers, B-2 and B-21. The H-20 is an intercontinental strategic bomber that may change the military balance in the Asia-Pacific region after its service. The problem is that the author of the article, Christian D.Orr, still believes that the H-20 is an bomber with an 8,000-kilometer range and a 10-ton bomb load. It can be said that this is very strange.
US media: H-20 intercontinental strategic bomber, range can cover Guam and Australia, range 8,000 kilometers of bomb load 10 tons
Article author Christian D. Orr made it clear that although the specific indicators of H-20 are still unknown, the H-20 may change the military balance in the Asia-Pacific region, and the H-20 must have been inspired by the B21 Raider stealth bomber and the B2 Ghost Stealth bomber.
The wind tunnel model mentioned in the War Zone article at that time
quoted the views of the related articles of "War Zone" in August this year, believing that the metal model suspected to be the wind tunnel experimental model is very similar to the previous H20 renderings, and the appearance of H20, B2 and B21 is very similar. And it also uses very subjective remarks that China often plagiarizes or directly steals US military technology, so it seems not surprising that there are similarities between H20 and B2. It is also speculated that recently Chinese official media often hinted that the H20 will be about to make its first flight, which is determined that the official debut or official leak of the H20 may not be far away.
also stated that the H-20 will be the first stealth bomber in the world that is not the United States that will be unveiled publicly, which may bring competition for air-based strategic forces into a new era. It also believes that the H-20 is an intercontinental strategic bomber that can penetrate the air defense system . It has a range of more than 8,000 kilometers, can carry 10 tons of ammunition, and has the ability to strike Guam or Sydney...
is derogatory, The H20-related article published in 1945 is generally speculated that the H20 range is 8,000 kilometers and 10-car bomb
. Since the Chinese military-industrial department has completely different external publicity strategies from the US military-industrial complex , an advanced American weapon often spreads overwhelmingly before the eight characters are drawn, while China is often a piece of equipment that cannot be hidden (swimming in the sea or flying in the sky) or when it has already been in service (the army group). The specific indicators of the H-20 are unknown. The speculation about the performance of the H-20 is really reasonable, and the mother-in-law is reasonable.
However, in these articles recently published in 1945, it is believed that the range and bomb load of the H-20 strategic bomber are 8,000 kilometers + 10 tons. The range and bomb load of the H-20 widely adopted by this group of US media are not as good as the range and 13.6 tons of the dual-engine design B-21 stealth bomber... How poor is the ability of China's bomber design in the eyes of this group of people?
H-6J/K/N performance is 8,000 kilometers of range + 10 tons of load. Could it be that this group of European and American media believe that China's latest four-engine flying wing stealth strategic bomber is a stealth version of the H-6? It is true that China has no experience in designing a brand new bomber, but the H-20 is at least a four-round heavy bomber. Not to mention the range and bomb loading, the B-2's 12,000 kilometers + 23 tons, at least not less than 10,000 kilometers + 20 tons, right? Otherwise, one-way flight may not necessarily hit the US mainland... But this group of people think that the H-20 is not as good as the B-21, which is outrageous.
China does not lack experience in stealth aircraft production experience, and does not lack engines for strategic bombers (WS-10 without afterburner version is enough. The engine of B-2 is 8-ton thrust without afterburner version F110. In fact, the engine of B-2 is the worst among the strategic bombers now...) There is no lack of experience in R&D and production of flying wing aircraft, and does not lack experience in bomber production (the H-6 is the largest active bomber). How can this group of US media think that the H-20 has only a range of 8,000 kilometers + 10 tons of load? And this American bricks said that the H-20 is an intercontinental bomber, and is it reasonable to say that the H-20 has only a range of 8,000 kilometers?
The reason why these American bricks think that the performance of the H-20 is so poor is because an article published by China Daily in 2015 stated that the range of the H-20 is 8,000 kilometers and the load is 10 tons, so they cited this article crazily as the basis for guessing the performance of the H-20.
It is true that because the performance of Chinese weapons is highly confidential, citing relevant performance speculations cited by Chinese official media, or related interviews, is an important way for European and American media to speculate on the performance of Chinese weapons. The problem is that the , which is regarded by Europe and the United States as the mouthpiece of the Chinese government, has also published many speculations on the performance of the H-20. In 2018, the Global Times also quoted that the H-20 speculation that the US media speculated that the H-20 has a range of 12,000 kilometers and a payload of 20 tons. Why didn't they quote this report? It just cites the speculation that the 8,000-kilometer range + 10-ton load is
What's more, a series of disclosed information at this stage shows that the H-20 is likely to use a double-line flying wing and a flat and vertical vertical tail. The gap is so big, but I still think the H-20 looks like a B-2? According to the basic logic of the US's set of things that look a bit like a copy, is the next generation of the US destroyer iron copy 055?
can only be said that these American media are very smart nowadays and cannot accept the fact that the United States is surpassed by others. In order to create an invincible image of the United States, they will crazily praise the superiority of American weapons and equipment. But thinking about it, strategic bombers may be just a few areas where the United States still has obvious advantages.
A series of weapons and equipment used by the US Army cannot be compared with China. The , which was blown to the sky, is thrown when compared with Chinese goods. The combination of 055+Eagle Strike 21+Fujian Ship+Kinetic Police600+J-35 makes nuclear submarine the last underwear of the United States. J-20+ Pili 15+Air Guard Series Early Warning Aircraft + various drones make the US Air Force very anxious. It is true that China still lacks strategic reconnaissance aircraft and strategic bombers, but the Chinese Air Force's airborne adjacent space unmanned reconnaissance aircraft, airborne ballistic missiles, etc. are also beyond the reach of the United States.
So the best thing the US military has to do is strategic reconnaissance aircraft, strategic bombers and nuclear submarines. Even if the United States still has certain advantages in other aspects, its advantages are already extremely weak. If you don’t rush to wait for a while (military field), you may not be able to do it.
